Title – To what extent will the groundwater replenishment scheme contribute to the sustainability of fresh water in Perth?
Problem Statement
The groundwater replenishment scheme is a development which treated waste
This inquiry is aimed to define what the Groundwater replenishment scheme is, and examine the trials the replenishment scheme has under taken, also if the water that has been processed through the replenishment scheme, is up to Perth’s drinking standards? and additionally the contribution effects it has on Perth’s climate change.
The inquiry will be guided by recently published articles that are relevant and full of valuable information, to strengthen and support the findings of the project. The research questions will be
…show more content…
The findings of the replenishment scheme, could be educational for young students.
The guiding questions for this inquiry are;
• What is the purpose of the Groundwater replenishment scheme?
• What are the impacts of the Replenishment scheme?
• How many trails has the Groundwater replenishment scheme undertaken?
• How is water quantity monitored?
• How does the groundwater replenishment scheme impact on Perth’s climate change?
• Would building more dams a secure solution?
Methodology
The first step was to research a problematic statement that was interesting, and would carry useful information, not only for the project investigator but for the wider community in Perth, WA. As the population of Perth is continually growing and experiencing dry climate change, the results and actions that are being taken into the water management in Perth. The inquiry was capitalized with the desire to know more about how the Groundwater Replenishment scheme operates and the quantity of trails it went through. The next step was creating a concept map and writing down all the information that was already known and questions that would carry out this inquiry, the concept map was developing with new added information. The project was established into key questions to attain wider research. Based on
Yet, humans have limited control on natural events, so this only reinforces the importance of managing water wisely. Recently California’s government has begun to focus more on sustaining and restoring the water supply. Dale Kasler (2016) articulates in his article some of the steps they have decided to make to solve this serious issue. The government has made the following investments: “$415 million for watershed restoration and other environmental aid for Lake Tahoe; up to $335 million for two proposed reservoirs in California, including the Sites reservoir north of Sacramento; $880 million for flood-control projects on the American and Sacramento rivers in Sacramento; and $780 million for flood-control projects in West Sacramento” (para. 10). This could be the first step to restoring the water to California. But these
Nestle the water bottling company pumps out water from a well located in Aberfoyle, which is 3.2 kilometres from Guelph’s southern boundary. Nestle produced around 762 million litres of water, that is approximately 2.1 million litres a day, on average. A 2015 report says that was only 58% of the amount they were permitted to take in the latest five-year provincial license. Guelph city Hall, says there are “limits to the available groundwater to satisfy Guelph’s future water supply needs.” Guelph city Hall says at the rate Nestle is pumping out the aquifer it can affect and trouble the city’s future water
This study sought to answer three research questions. Although the questions have been presented in previous chapters, they are worth presenting again.
To supplement the City’s upstate water supplies, the DEP will also rehabilitate the Queens Groundwater System, a system of 68 wells and aquifers in southeastern Queens. The groundwater system is expected to provide more than 33 million gallons of water a day to 100,000 residents in the locality. The DEP plans to install water treatment systems for the system to ensure that the wells produce high-quality water that meets or exceeds all water quality standards (“Water for the Future | Queens Groundwater Rehabilitation”).
Australia generates 5% non renewable water that can not be used again. 7% is spent in institutional uses for schools, daycares and other educational or institutions. 5% is used in recreational uses for activities such as camping, sports and other relevant to the subject. 7% is
Humanity has been interrelated with ecosystems, and at present, it is essential to reflect social sciences to environmental issues. Adaptive water management cannot be reached without understanding the needs of the affected people, and therefore supportable compromise between the community and institutions is vital. Over a long period of time, the MDB has experienced dramatic changes to its ecosystems, including the landscape and water cycle. Australia has attempted to revive the ecosystem of the MDB, and has joined international agreements. Thus the Commonwealth and the State governments also endeavoured to fulfil a constitutional mandate to perform the country’s obligations under those agreements. As a result, the Water Act and the Basin Plan have been enacted to optimise the economic, social and environmental outcomes from water use in the MDB. These regulatory schemes emphasised critical human water needs and imposed limits on use of water by the SDLs. However it was not easy to satisfy everyone’s demand where “values, needs, and aspirations of people differ from community to community, region to region and State to State”. Integrative water management can only be achieved through transparent communication and effective interactions of different authorities, experts, interest groups, and the public. However the Water Act and the Basin Plan mainly focused on the scientific experts and organisations, and considered individuals in the MDB communities less relevant, and therefore the Act and the Plan could not avoid criticism. In addition, it seems that there are more challenges than benefits of the water management system in the Water Act and the Basin Plan. It seems correct to state that both ecosystems and human social systems are complex. However through continuous implementations, the combination of ecology and sociology will be able to achieve sustainable
The main question of this investigation is separated into three key areas that will be included in this report. Three guiding questions are created to answer the main question. The following guiding questions are;
The Wentworth group points put that “these groundwater allocations are in aquifer systems that are considered to be highly connected to surface water.”( statement on the 2011 draft Murray darling basin plan,page13).Large change in the extraction of groundwater is unreasonable and has negative effects on the surface water resource since groundwater system is linked closely to surface water. The revised plan does not take the relationship between groundwater and surface water into consideration and it assumes that they are two separate systems. This results in an inaccurate increase in SDL of groundwater resource.
The project is a double success where pumping groundwater will remove the salinity risk and provide a source from which drinking water can be produced. This will also supplement the town water and reduce the pressure and dependency on piped water. Once successful, the project being a pilot programme, would see the installation of an expanded and longer term plant. Similar projects would also be rolled out to other saline towns in WA.
Once used up, groundwater is gone from that location forever and people are drawing water at an unsustainable rate. Groundwater is used mainly for agricultural purposes so it does not come as a surprise that the aquifers below large agricultural areas are being depleted at a quicker rate than those not near large crop fields. It is estimated “that the size of the global groundwater footprint is currently about 3.5 times the actual area of aquifers and that about 1.7 billion people live in areas where groundwater resources and/or groundwater-dependent ecosystems are under threat” (Gleeson, Wada, Bierkens, M., & van Beek, P.H. (2012). The need to constantly produce massive amounts of grain and other foods is taxing aquifers beyond their capacity, endangering the jobs and lives of billions of people. Although scientists do not know the specifics of how much water remains
Humans demand the need for the worlds freshwater supplies to be cultivated as the global population upsurges. With water being one of the most important natural resources, once flowing freely in abundance, it is beginning to become a highly valued commodity due to overuse, droughts, irrigation and damming and reduced water quality. Water management is the administration of water resourced under thorough policies and regulations that ensure a sustainable supply of water for present and future generations. Australia has the lowest rainfall of all the inhabited continents as well as the least river water, the smallest area of permanent wetlands and freshwater lakes. Coupled with the highest levels of water consumption in the world, it is
Environmental pressures, increasingly aggravated by climate change, are creating problems in the quantity and quality of water, which result in water stress situations. Social pressures, arising from changes in population dynamics and users preferences and expectations, are affecting water demand and consumption patterns. The growth of urban areas as a result of rural migration, abandonment of city centres to suburban regions and demographic changes are some of the dynamics that are radically modifying water demand projections (SWITCH, 2006).
It is widely known that water covers up to 70% of our planet’s surface. However, we have never been able to have enough fresh water to meet our demands. Up until now, 1.1 billion people worldwide still lack the access to usable water sources and a total of 2.7 billion find water scarce for at least one month of the year. (WWF) Even in a centralized industry area, the main water supply system sometimes not able to meet the demand.
It is widely known that water covers up to 70% of our planet’s surface. However, we have never been able to have enough fresh water to meet our demands. Up until now, 1.1 billion people worldwide still lack the access to usable water sources and a total of 2.7 billion find water scarce for at least one month of the year. (WWF) Even in a centralized industry area, the main water supply system sometimes not able to meet the demand.
American’s are oblivious and are using this precious water without a second thought to complete everyday tasks like water their yards and gardens. Since the clean water that is used to complete these tasks is very cheap, most people do not see the need to find alternative ways to water their lawns or gardens. Due to this, to dieter the misuse of freshwater, raising the price of freshwater has been talked about as a solution to this problem, in hopes that some of this water is conserved. “Higher water prices can, for instance, spur the adoption of measures such as the systematic reuse of used water (so-called gray water) for nonpotable applications” (Rogers par.18). With all of the water around us, it’s easy to see why people may think that there is an abundant supply of water. However, only three percent of the earths water is fresh and available for the population to use. With approximately seven billion people in the world, and around three-hundred million people in the United States, it is easy to see how the nation is going through this freshwater faster than it can be replenished. Informing the nation about this crisis is part of the solution to preserving the available freshwater. Another solution to the problem is also the use of greywater in replace of freshwater.