I joined at the SRS consulting Engineers Inc. on 1st October 2015 as a Scientist. The position was advertised as an Aquatic Biologist (yearly: min. $32000 max. $40000, Job bank on 2015-08-18) and I applied for this position but the company hired me as a scientist, higher position, but the salary range was $21000 - $26000/year, which was different than advertised one. Since the position was different and salary was low from the advertised position, I noticed to the Managing Principal (Phil Fung) in my first day of joining regarding this matter. I also told him, for working as a scientist I would need a well-equipped lab as well as a good compensation for me. However, after several months, Managing Principal (Phil Fung) offered me a position …show more content…
Researcher has 100% right to protect his/her ideas and expertise, but it was impossible in this company. In November 1st 2016, Company increased my salary $55833/year. Although the company increased the salary but he didn’t pay according to the increasing. I got another job at the University of Toronto in October/2016 (salary: 44000/year). He told me that he will minus from U of T salary and will pay remaining ($55833 – $44000 = $11833/year), even though I was working 35hr/week at the company. I covered these hours sometime whole day, sometime after 5 pm and Saturday, Sunday and some holidays. I was agreed to receive this mentioned salary but my question was remain, why the salary need to be minus from my another job? All on a sudden, he told that he decreased my salary. As I know, according to the “Employment Standard Act 2000 (ESA)”, employer can’t decrease employee’s salary without agreement with the employee. However, even according to his calculation ($11833/year, $986.08/month) after deduction of U of T salary, he didn’t pay me correct amount. He paid nothing for January 2017; owe for Jan $986.08. Paid for Feb 384.73; owe for Feb $601.35. Paid for March $741.01; owe for March $245.07. He paid nothing for April; owe for April 986.08. Total owe for salary: 2818.58. This amount according to his calculation (after minus of U of T job). He shouldn’t do it if he obey ESA. Owe for vacation pay 6526.66 (as Phil Fung mentioned in the
Employee’s remuneration must be reported on the annual return for each employee who worked in Nunavut even if their remuneration was not subject to the payroll
I am employed by Department of Defense Education Activity (DODEA). Headquarters, Department of Defense Education Activity (DODEA) pay setting actions are conform to, or in the absence of explicit criteria will be consistent with, the principles of law, regulations, collective bargaining agreement provisions and interpretations, and precedent decisions established by appropriate authorities, such as the General Accounting Office and Office of Personnel Management. The pay for DODEA educators and administrators in the Teaching Position (TP) pay plan is based on the pay for similar positions in urban school districts in the United States of 100,000 or more population. An educator 's pay is based upon the educational level of the employee
Deductions from your payroll can either be voluntary or mandatory. Understanding the difference for these deductions will explain the reasons why your paycheck doesn't match your salary.
Ensure that the computation of salaries will be accurate and will not affect or interrupt other related processes in the system
Firstly, the president and other management team members may get a higher overall salary by putting next year’s revenue to this year and transferring current year expenses to next year. The division’s management team’s salary and bonus may be based on the earnings of the division. By increasing revenue and decreasing expenses, they will be able to fake a higher operating income and thus receive higher compensation.
What are the current job specifications for the store manager job? Based on the information you have (or could have), how would you assess the validity of these specifications? What approaches would you use?
On 6/7/17 at approx 2000 hrs, Brian Irwin mentioned to Bobby Garcia that Jeremy Nelson offered him more money and he stated that he was offered 17.55 an hour. I, then told him “that’s good Brian glad they did” Brian then mentioned that he was supposed to get more money but that it was denied by Jeremy Vesely. Brian also stated that during the last conversation he had with Jeremy Nelson and Jeremy Vesely [via phone] he was supposed to get more than 18 because that’s what he was told by Jeremy Nelson. I then told him that if he has an issue with what he was offered he needs to take up to Jeremy Nelson and let him know how he feels. Just wanted to let you know before there’s another misunderstanding about this
the wage base was increased to $127,200, which is a 7% increase from the amount
• However, the employee would pay an addition $10,454 more than the original plan, hindering the employer-employee relationship
Under the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997, S 6-5(1), assessable salary incorporates common income and statutory income (S 6-10). Assessable salary is comprised of two incomes, which are; (1) Amounts which are "pay" inside of the standard importance of that word; and (2) Amounts which aren't usually considered as salary, however which Tax Law says will be burdened as though the sum is pay (statutory income). Section 6-10 states that a man's assessable pay additionally incorporates different sums (that are not common salary) but rather which are "incorporated in your assessable income by procurements about assessable pay." In the Tax Law, this is called "statutory wage." Pay is sorted into three wide criteria: (1) Income from individual administrations and work (compensation). (2) Income from business (exclusive business). (3) Income from property.
I was the first individual who performed secretarial duties for a paycheck at NewSong; the management was finally at a place where they could hire a second therapist and an individual to perform secretarial duties. Because I was the first individual who had these duties at NewSong there were not many, if any, listed duties I was given to perform, my supervisor and myself learned as we went, and changed my daily requirements as needed. I would operate the position I filled the same way NewSong currently operates both structurally and the human relations aspects. The position is fluid depending on what the lead therapist needs done daily, still some tasks stay the same day by day, such as billing and keeping new client forms updated. Something I would change is letting the worker know what is required of him or her the day before the task should be completed. I
I believe that overtime pay situation for this period was an attempt via restructured compensation format with 'Tru-Up' concept and needed hourly rate i.e., $22.41/Hr. (regular); $33.615/Hr. (Overtime), (both derived from the reduced base i.e., drastically reduced prevailing compensation/salary ($64100.00) to $39,118.20 (Base), $7500.00 (COLA) and $17482.00 ('Tru-Up')) .This approach/attempt has resulted in me in NOT receiving 'Overtime pay' in an extra/true manner for ALL the overtime hours that I have worked (beyond 40 Hrs. /week.).It was a situation that compensated me with SAME TOTAL GROSS PAY in one form or the other (Regular and 'Overtime' Or 'Tru-Up' (in subsequent/fluctuating paycheck(s))), regardless of working 40 Hrs.
The salary structure is inconsistent with people carrying out identical jobs having pay differences of up to £3,000 pa. This may cause friction within the team. Even when the company promotes an incentive bonus scheme for the production staff, the targets have not been met. And so the bonuses have never been paid. We do not know from the information given whether the targets are unrealistic or the workers do not see the scheme as being worthwhile. The production workers seem to be on a different path to the company’s.
I am writing in reference to my recent salary adjustment. My concern is that I have been overlooked in relation to dissolved positions being combined with my position and years of experience not counted. Since 2004 I have experienced salary compression due to the Hay Study. In addition to salary compression my position has been immensely affected by the dissolving of positions; combining of duties into my position, and addition of new grants, committees and departments. The workload and roles continues to grow, however, my salary remains compressed.
As it relates to a the job of a Property Manager at First Service Residential, there is a combination of inputs that determine where a worker will fall in regards to the pay range. An example would be having a four-year university degree or an equivalent combination of education and experience would most likely result in an employee being placed toward the top of the model. One of the requirements is having a CAM license. A CAM license is a Community Association Manager license that is required for those who want to manage homeowners and condominium associations of more than 10 units or have an annual budget in excess of $100,000. Some other requirements include: three years of experience as an on-site manager running the building operations, such as staff and service contracts, resident maintenance and resident improvements. A prospective property manager should have strong interpersonal skills and possess basic knowledge of different customer service principles and practices. Lastly, one must have or acquire the ability to read, analyze, and understand technical procedures. Not everyone has knowledge of Microsoft Office Applications, which is becoming more and more important as we move closer and closer to the future.