Unreciprocated Compassion One of the most important ideas Jesus stressed during his short ministry was the idea of compassion regardless of whether it is reciprocated or not. Unlike many teachers and religious authorities of the time, Jesus advocated compassion over holiness, or laws. This is evident from his quotes within the Lost Gospel Q, and it reveals that compassion was the heart behind his message and ministry. My passage from the Lost Gospel Q about showing compassion to one’s enemy without expecting anything in return is important to the overall understanding of the Lost Gospel Q because it illustrates the repetitive idea of unreciprocated compassion in Jesus’ message that set Him apart from other teachers. The Lost Gospel Q is shrouded in mystery, and the identity of the author as well as the transcripts of the original copy are still unknown to this day. It is believed that the Lost Gospel Q was “written in the 50’s of the first century, only a …show more content…
This unknown source of overlapping material between Matthew and Luke was named “The Lost Gospel Q” after the German word ‘Quelle’, or source (Borg, Marcus). The Lost Gospel Q is a ‘sayings gospel’ in the sense that it is primarily a compilation of Jesus’ sayings, rather than a narrative account of his birth, baptism and crucifixion like the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke (Borg, Marcus). The Q can be split up into 3 different categories including wisdom teaching, conflict or judgement sayings, and teachings about Jesus himself
The Gospel of Luke was also written around eighty CE, written somewhere outside of Palestine (Tatum, 1999, p.34). The author may have been Luke the Gentile Christian, writing to another Gentile, Theophilus. Like Matthew, Luke is strongly believed to be written after Mark, with references from him, “Q” and “L” if following the Two (Four)-Document Hypothesis. The authors of Luke and Matthew are believed to be written during the same time without the knowledge of knowing. As mentioned before, Luke is about fifty percent longer than Mark is, making it important source since it contains more information about the historic life of Jesus. There is also a second part to Luke which is the book Acts, but is separate in Bible. Both include the beginnings
“The Church has always and everywhere maintained, and continues to maintain, the apostolic origin of the four Gospels. The apostles preached, as Christ had charged them to do, and then, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they and others of the apostolic age handed on to us in writing the same message they had preached, the
Q is short for “quelle” and means “source.” The concept behind Q is to reconstruct the original sayings of Jesus. Many quotes of Jesus found in the Bible may very well have been embellished or forged. So it is of interest to some to endeavor to find the original or lost sayings of Jesus. This can be achieved by searching through the Gospels, comparing and contrasting their contents until a common thread is found, which might better reveal Jesus' true words. Thus, the quelle, or source, of Jesus' sayings is found. “The Lost Gospel Q: The Original Sayings of Jesus”, written by Marcus Borg, is an effort by the author to deliver the purest messages and statements from Jesus to the readers. To achieve this objective, Borg presents the literature in a completely unadulterated fashion. These sayings have been removed from any context or purpose and are presented to the reader in a manner that provokes thought and reflection. Each of the Q sayings of Jesus are presented alone on a page, with an occasional footnote providing some explanations or interesting background information relating to the saying. A cross reference is also provided at the back of the book, making it easy to cross reference the Q with the parallel scriptures in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. This
1. When the Gospel of Thomas was discovered in December of 1945 at Nag Hammadi, Egypt, many people questioned if this book belonged with the other four gospels. Thomas (Hebrew) or Didymus (Greek) also nicknamed as “Doubting Thomas,” described as a man who would not believe until he saw it with his own two eyes. He ceaselessly questioned and was misanthropic about Jesus while the other eleven disciples believed from the beginning. Thomas’s book was full of Jesus’s sayings whereas the other four books contains Jesus’s sayings as well, but in a story format that starts from the beginning of when Jesus was born to the day he resurrects from the dead. Thomas wrote down Jesus’s 114 sayings when he was his disciple. Elaine Pagels’s Beyond
Example 2: God wants us to have a heart of compassion for others. Compassion involves feeling, but it involves so much more. If we only feel, then we are sympathetic. If our sympathy motivates us to act, then it becomes compassion. True compassion feels and it acts. Notice that compassion begins with feeling. Without feeling, there is no compassion. Feeling is not enough, but it is a place to begin. If we do not weep for those who are hurting, how can we minister to them? We must be about the Savior’s preoccupation with people. I believe that if we serve hurting people, encourage those in despair, help those in need, and hurt with those in pain, we will have not only enriched their lives but have done exactly what God would want us to do. People don’t go where the action is; people go where the love is. I have worked in the geriatric nursing field my entire adult life and the most important impact on the lives that I touch is my ability to be compassionate. I find that when a spouse or children
Similarly, the topic of the Synoptic Gospel and its problems relate to the questions surrounding this core issue. With the Synoptic Gospel, similarities are found across all three gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Stories were accounted for and verbal identical versions were found too, so the speculative questions that revolved around this matter, were how can this phenomenon be explained? Who copied from whom? Or was there an older document that acted as a source? The same type of questions can also be said for the Documentary Hypothesis as the same themes are running through this
Compassion has little to no boundries. In almost every great story there is a specific character or a group of characters that help the protagonist because they feel bad for them. Compassion is the most important aspect of a functioning society; therefore, Elie Wiesel’s Night, 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, and the generosity of spirit shown by the average citizen after the recent shooting in Las Vegas are all perfect examples.
God has endless compassion for each of us. Often we allow this compassion to pass by unnoticed, holding back from completely trusting and opening our hearts to God’s love. In so doing, we become like a dry desert awaiting the rain. Though this desert might seem tough and lifeless on the surface, the rain eventually provides nourishment which transforms the desert into a habitat of flowers, beauty, and life. We are like the dry desert awaiting the rains of compassion from our Lord. I say, wait no longer. God constantly floods us with compassion; we must open the gates of our hearts and allow this compassion to flow in. This essay synthesizes ideas and text from Father Gregory Boyle, Dr. Sanchez’s lectures, and my own life, providing a comprehensive
Brueggemann writes that Jesus’ compassion is not a simple emotional reaction, but it is a public criticism of society. Jesus challenged the imperial consciousness and demanded more from society through his teachings and parables. Compassion knows that hurt and injustice are not acceptable for a society and should not be viewed as social norms. However, ancient empires weren't built by compassionate rulers, they were set up and built on inequality and the maltreatment of certain people. As a contrast, Jesus and the alternative consciousness embodied grace and empathy as a basis for society, which Brueggemann believes to be a strength that allowed him to bring radical transformation during and after his time. The power to grieve the death of
The movie “John Q” by Denzel Washington is about a man whose nine-year is in desperate need for heart transplant, when he discovers that his medical insurance won’t cover and there is no alternative way to pay for the surgery or even to get his name on the organ lists. John Q. Archibald takes the hospital emergency room in hostage to save his child. John Q may be viewed either a bad or a good character, in this argument the question is was John Q was morally right to take the hospital hostage to save his son? If yes than how? People are always trying to do the right thing, such as handing in assignments, getting to work on time, donating. This may make you look like a good person, by there is always a motive behind why you do something, if it’s to just please people and have a good profile, Did John Q care about being a good person or the consequences or was he just trying to save his son? This will be identified through philosopher’s theories of ethics and if in this situation is what the character did morally right and how.
In this teaching, Jesus was saying that we treat one another with love and compassion as he have loved us as much as laying his life for our sake, in order for us to join him in the kingdom of God. He said that we should speak well even to those who curse and despitefully use us and abuse us because, our reward for such time is in heaven and it is God who will revenge about these things for us. He said that we should love our enemy also not only our friends because God loves us the same way and God does not discriminate from anyone, despite their falls.
2 Timothy 2:1-4, “You therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus. And the things that you have heard from me among many witnesses, commit these to faithful men who will be able to teach others also. You therefore must endure hardship as a good soldier of Jesus Christ. No one engaged in warfare entangles himself with the affairs of this life, that he may please him who enlisted him as a soldier. “
A lot about the gospels remains unknown to scholars. But the similarities help understand what texts were available to who. The “two-source hypothesis” already depicts and early Christianity where some gospels, such as the Gospel of Mark and the ‘Q’ scroll were easily accessible to enough people that the other synoptic gospels could be based on them. There may be many similarities in the gospels that help pin together the life and death of Jesus, but many of the differences prevent a crystal clear
In the Matthew’s account of the Gospel as well as in the Luke’s there are several duplicates of the same text, while in the Gospel of Mark the same text appears only once, one of this examples is found in Mark, in the parable of the measure, (Mk. 4:25[NRSV]). The same declaration, almost word for word appears twice in separate occasions in Matthew verses 13:12 and in 25:29 and in Luke 8:18 as well as in 19:26. The same dynamic appears twenty two times in Matthew where as according to scholars who support the outside sources theory, the doublets mentioned above allegedly prove that the writers of Matthew and Luke both took liberty in benefiting from the Markan account as well as the “Q”, “M” and that of the “L” sources.
The Gospel of John differs in many key areas to the Synoptics,and I will address some differing lines of thought.