Throughout this class I did not know what to expect or what I could gain from it, after the groups we have had I walked out of class each day more informed than when I came in. I absolutely feel that I have changed my entire outlook on the media bias and stereotypes. I felt that before this class I was unaware of how negative these stereotypes and portrayals really were. Almost if I was being selfish for being unaware, because I felt some of these stereotypes or media bias did not affect me. Now that I reflect on what I was thinking at the time, I know better, I especially know that as a woman and person of color, the media and stereotypes equally target us, maybe women more. In this paper, I will reflect on three past groups such as …show more content…
Another shocking issue that changed my thinking was Native American mascots, such as controversial team the Washington Redskins. Previously I never thought Native American mascots meant any harm or that they were negative. I believe I felt this way because my high school mascot was the Cowboys, and our rival school was the Indians, It never seemed to be a problem to me or my school. I am thankful for this class and our discussions because I know now to think for both sides of the argument and see that there was always a problem with it. King quotes Danielle N’Dhighes reaction to Native American mascots, “Using Native Americans as mascots is racist and should be stopped immediately. After all we don’t see teams like the Washington Blackskins.. or the San Francisco Slant Eyes. Almost everyone would agree that such things would be racist and denigrating. Why then do we allow Redskins and Chief Wahoo?” (73). I also asked myself Why? I believe this further brings to the argument that Americans forget that Native Americans actually exist and are an ethnicity. The last issue I learned from the Native Americans group was the major lack of diversity in the media specifically Native American actors. I was unaware of how serious this was, there are no major actors who identify as Native American. When being casted, producers do not seek Native Americans they rather seek for either a white actor or someone of a different ethnicity.
Over the past couple of decades the usage of offensive stereotypes have played a big role in popular films, TV shows, music videos, and comedy routines today. In fact one can only argue that these offensive stereotypes have increased considerably and will only continue to grow. There are many reasons as to why these stereotypes have only increased and have led to the creators of these films making millions and millions of dollars. The main reason behind this is making fun of race, color, poverty, and other cultures and using straightforward offensive words to do so is humorous to a large part of the US population. Although most of us would feel insulted if these
There has been many controversy with teams using Native American name for mascots and has become a major issue in today’s society. Many have viewed the Washington Redskins as honor for Native Americans, others see it racist, insensitive, and demeaning. Woods (2016) claims that “the complaint is that the use of stereotypical team names, mascots, and logos perpetuates an ideology that dehumanizes and demeans the cultures of Native Americans” (p. 298). Since the issue arise, many scholars, journalists and leaders have joined the battle to ensure that each team will eliminate the nicknames since it is considered abusive or hostile. It may take time but the trend is growing. More than 1,400 professional, collegiate,
Many areas of the world have been affected because they were accused of having a racist mascot or team name. In the United States many teams have respect for Native Americans. Counterpoint: Native American-Themed Sports Teams Represent the History and Traditions of the Areas They Represent, and Changing Names Does a Disservice to the
The dispute over whether Native American mascots should be used as a team symbol dates back to the 1970’s (Price 2). There are those who are passionately against Native American mascots. These advocators insist that Native American mascots are degrading to
“To remember who you are, you will need to forget what society has tried to teach you to be...culture matters. Be proud.” These words from an unknown Native American about one major subject: Native American culture. The beliefs of Native culture have been with Native people for as long as they have lived. They believe in sacred acts that have supported and healed Natives and better their heritage. Then Whites began to make American Indian mascots to “honor” Natives. They have had a purpose to honor Natives, but have recently shown a bias towards Natives. Over the past 30 years, there has been a national argument between non-natives and Natives as to whether school and professional sports teams should use Native American imagery as their mascots,
Former chair of the Los Angeles Native American Commission, Jack Shakley, in his argument, “Indian Mascots-You’re Out!” disputes whether Native American mascots should be allowed to be the face of American sports teams. Shakley’s purpose is to convey the idea that is insensitive to have Native Americans as mascots. Jack Shakley uses a passionate tone to show readers that not only is using a Native American mascot racist, but it is wrong and should be changed to a less offensive mascot. Shakley starts off using pathos to the readers by telling a story from his childhood. In the article, Shakley demonstrates the ability to use strong pathos and logos arguments to support his claims that we should get rid of Native American mascots and steam names.
Since the mid-1900s, the questionable legacy of Native American names used as sports mascots has sparked debate across the United States. "After 81 years, the Washington Redskins name continues to hold the memories and meaning of where we come from, who we are, and who we want to be in the years to come," Washington’s NFL owner, Dan Snyder, declared when faced with condemnations of the controversial name. While many uphold Snyder’s statement, others are offended, and are determined to eliminate all team mascots with Native American symbolism. However, the Washington Redskins are not alone in the debate against Native American logos and mascots. Any sports team should be allowed to represent themselves by using Native American words.
“As the nation’s oldest, largest, and most representative American Indian and Alaska Native advocacy organization, NCAI has long held a clear position against derogatory and harmful stereotypes of Native people—including sports mascots—in media and popular culture” (“Ending the Era of Harmful ’Indian’ Mascots” 1). Native Americans have been used as mascots and names for several high school, college, and professional teams such as the Washington Redskins with their Native American mascot. The term “Redskins” or any other term about Native Americans should not be used for any sports teams at any level, because it implies a snide nature, that it damages how people perceive their culture, and how Native American children perceive themselves.
In the big picture, Current Events magazine, Oregonlive.com, and Dan Snyder’s video all contribute to defending the continued use of Native-like mascots. With the approval of a group of Native Americans; Chiefs, Redskins, Braves, and more, can not only thrive, but be kept as logos to represent universities, teams and community members. Natives feel honored rather than disrespected hearing their tribe names throughout the US. These mascots hold lots of victories throughout their states and schools, let these symbols live
A very sensitive subject and tough question that has been asked since the early 1900's is, should controversial sports mascots be replaced with mascots that are not offensive. It is a topic that continues even today as people protest against what they believe is stereotypical sport mascots. In the article, Controversial Sports Mascots Be Replaced, the authors of each article discusses how certain groups of people, specifically Native Americans, believe certain mascots are offensive and should from sport team names. The author attempts to create sympathy within the reader by sharing a story from is youth that tells how his mom was displeased with a hat he wore home that had a Chief wahoo on it. He told how his mom "jerked his hat off and threw it in the trash" because "she had been fighting against Indian stereotypes all her life."
For years Native Americans have been ridiculed, abused, oppressed, and much more. They’re typically the butt of everyone's jokes and have been for some time. Many try to argue that Native American mascots should be looked at as a symbol of respect and that they’re honoring their rich culture, some flat out say it’s senseless humor and that they shouldn’t be offended by it. But what many people fail to realize is that costumes, mascots, imitations, and jokes are all dehumanizing and extremely offensive. Sports teams with Native American mascots contribute heavily to the dehumanizing of Native Americans by associating them with savagery and war.
The American Indian Sports mascots is a prime example of dysconscious racism. As a result, Native Americans have to endure mental and physical suffering daily. The first step to eradicating the offensive sports mascots is to mobilize the opposed of the racist mascots and ensure the voices are heard on mainstream media. The public will start to see how appalling it would be to keep American Indian Sports mascots, correspondingly gaining the attention of team owners, which will result in a more favorable chance of removing the
The issue of whether or not it is morally right to use Native Americans as mascots has been prevalent for several decades. Some argue that it is an honor to use their images as symbols of a school or team’s ideals, while others say Natives are a people, not a mascot. I hold the position that unless a tribe explicitly states they are not against their image being used, the depiction of Natives as mascots is wrong, especially for largely white areas and/or schools. The idea that the race who marginalized, relocated, and murdered another race that was native to this country and then, in some cases only a century later, proclaim that they “are an Indian” and are proud to call themselves such is unsettling. A century may seem like a large amount
The range spans from the most obvious source of Native American groups all the way to the American Psychological Association. At the root, the argument against the use of Native American mascots is that is exacerbates racism towards native peoples. Essentially, with the extreme reach of influence that sports have in the United States, these mascots and team names are an extensive representation for the majority of the public that do not partake in research on this issue. As one could imagine, this leads to harsh generalizations as well as inaccurate representations of Native Americans as a whole. However on the contrasting side of the argument, teams, fans, and community members state that the use of these mascots should be revered as an honor and not the alternative. Mascot supporters generally claim the importance of the Native American illusion that it raises awareness for Native Americans but do not understand the perpetual damage that these team names actually cause. It is important to understand that the prevalence of these team names leads to an overall theory of the public that there is nothing wrong with accepting the fact that these generalizations are okay with every party involved. Whereas, the vast majority of Native Americans – those of which are actually being portrayed by these mascots – people do not agree with the usage to any
During the process of producing a television series, the demand for the producers to introduce their characters with only their highlighted traits make it impossible for viewers to gain a deep understanding of the community that the characters represent. One of the stereotypic traits that is usually seen on movies and television shows is societal difference that each race is placed into. Michael Omi in his article In Living Color: Race and American Culture stated that “in contemporary television and film, there is a tendency to present and equate racial minority groups and individuals with specific social problems” (546). There are many films and television shows found today that ground racial minorities into a specific social problems that are related to the color of their skin. It can be inferred from the current popular culture that this stereotype still persists.