preview

The Most Dangerous Game Compare And Contrast

Decent Essays

One significant difference between “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell and the film version is the way the traps are used. For example, the outcome of the Malay Man-Trap is different in the story than it is in the movie . In the story, Sanger Rainsford finds a dead tree and rests it on a smaller living tree. Rainsford’s goal is for the tree to fall on General Zaroff, but Zaroff senses the trap and jumps back, the tree blowing a hit at his shoulder rather than his head. Although this is not what Rainsford was hoping, it is good that it hit Zaroff because Rainsford has more time to run and hide while Zaroff fixes his wound. However, in the movie, Zaroff sees the trap and shoots it with an arrow, the tree falling at his feet. …show more content…

This shows that Zaroff is not giving up on trying to find Rainsford and Eve. Another trap that is different is the Burmese Tiger Pit. In the story, Rainsford digs a hole in the ground that is so deep it reaches his shoulders and plants sharp stakes in the bottom. Then, he covers the hole with a rough woven carpet of weeds and hides behind a tree. Zaroff does not fall into the hole, but one of his best dogs does. In contrast, Rainsford and Eve find an existing hole and cover it with leaves and grass in the film. General Zaroff sees the hole and simply hops over it. Zaroff is also a hunter, so he knows all the traps there are and easily sees the hole with no trouble. Zaroff also does not have a dog with him to fall in the hole like in the story. There is also a difference with the construction of the Uganda Knife Trick. The story describes how Rainsford creates the knife trick as: “He caught hold of a springy young sapling and to it he fastened his hunting knife with the blade pointing down the trail; with a bit of wild grapevine he tied back the sapling” on page eighty-two, that is completely different from the

Get Access