The Outsourced Work Case Study The case study was very interesting it was based on ethics of the contract agreement entered into by RMC and 17 project labor agreement. The purpose of this case was to see where liabilities fell when certain parties were not abiding by the original agreement that was entered into by RMC and 17 local building trade unions. In the case such questions surrounding these liability factors. After reading the case study Is BE (Bolton Engineering) bound by the terms of the project labor agreement, which it did not directly sign, including the duty to submit this labor dispute final and binding arbitration for resolution? BE is bound by the terms of project labor agreement only when they are working onsite …show more content…
It is the job of the union to protect these workers and ensure that they do not overlook the licensed and union workers for cheap labor that is nonunion and most likely not licensed. Work preservation clauses are not only legitimate but are generally legal. As it is the union’s job to protect their members job so they do so by entering into an agreement bringing work back to a
In 1947 it was revised to help better protect employees as well as employers. The revision stated that employees and managers must bargain “in good faith” with each other, and illegalized wild cat strikes, (refusing to work under a valid contract). These rights help employees as well as employers to be treated fairly. Forcing employees and employers to work together as a team can increase their understanding of where each side is coming from, as well as making it easier to compromise. The act also prevented businesses from becoming “closed shops,” (places where only union members were hired.) and prevented members from forcing others to join a union. Employees were also given the option to hold elections to certify and decertify unions. Employers were given the freedom to voice any concerns they had over unions so long as they did not interfere with the organization of unions. The revised act also gives the president the power to call off strikes in the event that it becomes a national emergency. A board may be hired to examine the situation of the strike so that the president may better understand why the situation has not been resolved. The president can then put an injunction on the strike; if a decision is not reached, the injunction can be extended.
The company after realizing that there was union organization in progress increased employee workload while reducing the workweek (called a stretch out). This is an implied financial threat by management that they controlled the workers, their income and their ability to have a job and their time off from the job. As long as employees showed sympathy to the union that management would make it hard on them. This is another potential violation of the ULP
If the subcontractor to whom a struck company has contracted work is unionized, its employees legally can refuse to perform the work. Such refusals are allowed under the
Numerous issues can arise when a unionized workplace is formed. One of the major issues is flexibility, because union members are allowed to work a certain amount of period only.
The issue is whether the appelles, Avanell Looney and Rita Alexander, had acted for or on behalf of J&R Construction at the time of signing the contract.
They were not willing to make any concessions. They wanted them to continue with the long hours as mandated by them. If the workers didn’t agree to these terms they would be fired. Employers knew that people needed jobs and were not concerned about filling vacant positions. In today’s age, if you’re working that many hours we believe that we should get paid for what we worked. They felt they same way, but because of the union they didn’t receive those rights.
Right, to-Work Laws initially showed up in a few states after Congress established the 1935 National Labor Relations Act, otherwise called the Wagner Act, and most are still active today in about twenty-two states today. The rights associated with these laws displayed the differences of the ideology amongst business and representative. They ensure the individual laborer 's opportunity to decline to join or to help bolster a union, including one picked by the employee to represent as their bartering agent. Consequently, from the point of view invigorating the Wagner Act, they were meant to create frictions leading to the disruption of any labor agreements. More particularly, ideal right-to-work laws are pointed against union security
They are various employer tactics that interfere with employee’s “freedom of choice in being represented by their chosen advocates”. Unions may not try to influence management to discipline employees who did not join the union or refuse to represent employees because they are not union members. Some differences include that unions may not demand or require that an employer take action against an employer for any reason. A failure to pay union dues is an exception to this rule. Unions are also not allowed to force individuals to pay excessive initiation fees for union membership. In management, employers and unions may negotiate contract clauses requiring union membership as a condition of continued employment, also known as a union shop agreement. Also, employers may not refuse to bargain with an union over issues of pay, hours or other terms and conditions of employment. Furthermore, unions may not influence employees in the exercise of Section 7 rights. Meanwhile, in management an employer may not interfere with an employee engaging in any activity protected by Section 7. (Fossum,
I would agree with you regarding why Weston City take utilizes an outsourcing system, and it does seem to working for their city. Not to mention, outsourcing has become the norm for many organizations, and the public-sector has become committed to outsourcing, which allows the private-sector to grow because the majority of the jobs are outsourced to the private sector. So the indication of contracting public services to private companies to cut cost makes sense. If someone is willing to fix streets or put out fires for less money, that should be a plus for a government’s bottom line. Many state and local governments have identified hundreds of millions of dollars in savings by hiring outside contractors or a neighboring city’s services to
Ethical theory will be outlined in relation to the example case with discussion on how the case poses an ethical dilemma in the workplace. Additionally ethical theory will be considered in light of the case with
The advantages I see from my company using domestic sourcing is we get shipments fast. When you have a patient with a broken frame, you want that frame as fast as possible. Many times if the lab has the frame the will have it the next day. Domestic sourcing is cheaper. Never really have a delay for the sourcing we use. Also, there are so many domestic sources to chose from, if I do not like one source I can easily switch to another. Some disadvantages I see from the company I use for domestic sourcing is boxes are smashed. Some patients have received broken glasses. We have received smashed boxes and broken frames. Quality of handle is not that great. It also seems customer service is lacking. I called one source and asked them about shipping
There are several factors and aspects to consider when determining the benefits and disadvantages of using an outside vendor for essential services. In my current position, outside vendors are used in business management and support services, food services, and transportation. One of the benefits of utilizing an outside vendor for one or more of the essential services of the school district is that it allows the organization to focus on its core purpose of educating students. Additionally, an outside vendor could potentially hire qualified personnel for hard-to-fill positions as well as find substitutes for staff who are absent. An outside vendor is responsible for providing all of the training and certification requirements for its employees.
In analyzing the second reason listed for why outsourcing is used; ‘inability to attract the highest caliber of employees to job functions that may be peripheral to the organization’s core discipline’, companies employ a different kind of outsourcing tactic. This reason leads to offshore outsourcing solutions. If a company cannot attract high caliber domestic employees to job functions secondary to their main function then they seek help where labor may be less expensive and more efficient.
LEGO Group was formed by a carpenter Ole Kirk Christiansen in 1932 in Billund, Denmark. The Word, LEGO was meant to attract kids of various age groups, it is derived from Danish phrase, “leg godt” meaning: “Play well”. Initially LEGO was produced as a wooden brick, with their motto, “Only the best is the best.” The LEGO Brick was produced in 1958 composed of interlocking tubes that offered unlimited building opportunities. The purpose of The LEGO Brick was to inspire creative and controlled problem solving, while adhering to common curiosity using your everyday imagination (Sandgaard Jensen). It was awarded “Toy of the century” by Fortune Magazine, as well as British Association of Toy Retailers. LEGOs was sold in more than 130 countries. A couple major products include: Pre-school products LEGO DUPLO, Play Themes LEGO city line, BIONICLE, and many more Licensed Products built up around movies or books also including a LEGO Education Board game. Market sizes category US, Australia, United Kingdom, New
In the eyes of the government, the company could do no wrong” (Browning, 1993). As in many ethical challenges in business, the lack of oversight or lack of enforcement of policies contribute to the dilemma. “Union Carbide is able to continue operating the Bhopal Plant -- despite its deterioration -- due to the state of Madhya Pradesh and the Indian government not enforcing safety and environmental laws and regulations” (Murphy-Medley, 2001). There was almost a collusive relationship between Union Carbide and the Indian authorities. (Browning, 2003). “The flouting of industrial safety provisions {was} winked at, accidents, even fatalities, are improperly investigated and an unholy alliance allowed to develop between the high government functionaries and the… management at the cost of plant safety” (Browning, 2003).