The Principles Of The Mental Health Act 2014

Bonney and Stickley (2008) note the theme of power is often raised by service users. If, as predicted by the DOH in 2003, services are to become increasingly individual focused, the system needs to place power with service users. There is increasing amounts of service user literature that places an emphasis on individuals defining their own journey of recovery (Unit 21, pg 66) rather than having it imposed on them by workers. Peter Beresford (Audio 4) notes that currently there are inequalities in mental health services with limited service user power but considerable professional power. Bonney and Stickley mention Martyn (2002, cited in Bonney and Stickley 2008) who proposes professionals should be present by service user invitation only. A less radical aim is that of a gradual transfer of responsibility in power from services to individuals during recovery. It is important such involvement confers genuine power to individuals, rather than being tokenistic (Jacobson 2004, cited in Bonney and Stickley 2008).

The NSW Mental Health Act 2007 lays down the foundation in the proper provision and facilitation of care and treatment to persons with mental health disorders and promote their recovery while protecting the rights of these persons. One of the provisions of the Act uplifting this objective is in the involvement of family and nominated carers of patients. As defined by the Act, designated carers may represent from the person’s guardians; the parent

It remains clear that professionals within the primary care sector are not receiving adequate training in mental health care. They do not have sufficient knowledge of mental health and many do not possess the general skills required day to day when working with mental health service users (DoH, 2012, pg5, online). This is supported by Good Medical Practice (2006),(General Medical Council, GMC) which sets out the principle guidance for GPs offers no mention of individuals with mental health issues, suggesting that this document is based solely on the general population and does not taking into account the differing needs of those with mental health issues. A programme that was introduced in Wales in 2011 provides Mental Health First Aid Training to a large group of service providers including primary care. It teaches them to provide initial help to someone experiencing mental health problems, deal with a crisis situation or the first signs of someone developing

Socially valued roles and support should mean groups or communities are equipped to cope with mental health issues.

The Mental Health Services Act is a monumental proposition that has helped many people for more than a decade. In California alone, close to 1.2 million adults and around 422,000 children live with a serious mental illness (State 2010). Without the proper treatment, suicide is the leading cause of death for a person battling an untreated mental illness (State 2010). With over thirteen billion dollars raised so far, MHSA has been the root of funding for mental health in California (Williams 2015). MHSA is still a work in progress. The act is nowhere near perfect, as a recent audit has shown, but it is certainly a step in the right direction.

At what point is an individual considered mentally unwell and in need of treatment and importantly who has the authority to determine their mental wellbeing? The Mental Health Act 2014 indicates the criteria for compulsory treatment is directed by a context whereby an individual is considered to be at risk of serious harm to themselves or others (Mental Health Act 2014, p. 16). This legal framework in which the Act is situated establishes a precedent for interrelated institutions to ascribe to. Notably, the Act stipulates compulsory treatment should only be considered when

A national strategy for promoting mental wellbeing and mental health is No Health Without Mental Health.

Furthermore, tremendous advances have been made in the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses in the recent decades. Nowadays, someone with a mental illness is treated with respect, just like every other person, because, in fact, everyone is equal. Society’s goals today are to treat and support the mentally ill individuals enough so they can live in

The author will also discuss the principles of the Mental Capacity Act (2005) and the Mental Health Act (1983) and how it protect an adult who is vulnerable and lacks capacity. Likewise, the author will discuss ranges of nursing interventions, person-centred care, and ethical dilemmas.

In this essay I will be discussing the reasons why mental health should be invested in and the misconceptions surrounding the topic.

Policies have an important role in regulating and shaping the values in a society. The issues related to mental health are not only considered as personal but also affecting the relationships with significant others. The stigma and discrimination faced by people with mental health can be traced to the lack of legislation and protection of rights (Rodriguez del Barrio et al., 2014). The policy makers in mental health have a challenging task to protect the rights of individuals as well as the public (Swigger & Heinmiller, 2014). Therefore, it is essential to analyse the current mental health policies. In Canada, provinces adopt their own Mental Health Acts (MHA) to implement mental health services. As of January 15, 2016, there are 13 mental health acts in Canada (Gray, Hastings, Love, & O’Reilly, 2016). The key elements, despite the differences in laws, are “(1) involuntary admission criteria, (2) the right to refuse treatment, and (3) who has the authority to authorize treatment” (Browne, 2010). The current act in Ontario is Mental Health Act, 1990.

Access to mental health care is not as good as than other forms of medical services. Some Americans have reduced access to mental health care amenities because they are living in a countryside setting. Others cannot get to treatment for the reason of shortage of transportation or vast work and household tasks. In some areas, when a

A definitive answer for this issue is to keep up a working open psychological well-being treatment framework so that rationally sick persons don't wind up in detainment facilities and prisons. To this end, open authorities need to:

Every year people are diagnosed with a mental health illness and need special care and support. Roughly 40% of adults in the UK who suffer from a learning disability also have a mental health condition. Depending on an individual’s particular condition and their mental capacity, will determine the most practical care solution. 63,000 people were detained under the Mental Health Act in 2015/16 in England. – an increase of 47% over the past decade. Some patients can be treated in hospitals or

Furthermore, the MHA states that a person who as a result of mental health disorders can be sectioned if they pose a risk either to themselves or the community. This involves admission to the hospital for mental health treatment which might be against their will. Before a person is sectioned, an assessment would be carried out to explore the person’s mental state (Department of health 2015 and Rethink mental illness 2014). Pandarakalam (2015) takes the stance that, MHA protects vulnerable adults and the community. It enables them to gain back control over their lives and deterioration is prevented as a result of compulsory admission. Nevertheless, sectioning of patients can lead to suicidal attempts, feeling more depressed and being stigmatised. But to determine if an individual lacks