America stands for something that no other country has secured as much as we. We do not negotiate with terrorists. The terrorists first asked for the freedom of suspected muslims from a government prison in exchange for Jim’s freedom. I believe that it was moral for the government to have not complied from Syria for the trade off. This will show that America is weak and gullible and will set us back decades. In this certain case, the cons overpower the pros. The government knew that the cost was very important, but they must put national security then personal issues. War is caused by human beings, and it is up to us to save humanity amid of this horrible tragedy. Even if I have to give my life to open the eyes of the world, I must confront …show more content…
Jim definitely appreciated the gift of being human since he loved interactions with strangers. He always used his intellect and intuition to see things before they happened. Jim always had faith in his government system through the end. He also leaded a group of prisoners to not turn on each other. Jim always had a solid conscience and always knew what to do. If he ever made a mistake, he always go back to correct. He forgives everyone who did him wrong. He even loved God above all, including his other peers. Religion and faith goes hand in hand since it gives people spiritual strength. It keeps people from dying instantly and gives them hope. Jim always believed that it does not matter what religion he worships, just as long as he doesn't lose that feeling. Religion is like a language, it does not matter if you say I love you in spanish, french, japanese, because the only thing that mattered is the feeling. Even though many people worshipped different religions, it does not matter since it is all the
The American Civil War started in 1861 and ended in 1865. The two sides of the war are the Union (North) and Confederacy (South). The South wanted to keep slavery to maintain their economy and they worried that the North would end slavery. The South then seceded, starting the conflict. Around 620,000 people died in the war. Both sides of the war had advantages and disadvantages in the Civil War. Population in the South was small because it was based around farming communities, putting them at a disadvantage because they had fewer people to make up their army. On the other hand, they had great generals and a lot of morale. Meanwhile, the North’s large
Railroads are not nearly as popular in the United States as they are in European countries. Prior to the American Civil War, railroads were a fairly new, and untried, invention. Compared to carriages and the other modes of transportation at the time, the railroad was far superior. Due to this superiority, they were used to transport soldiers, food, and supplies. A systemic railroad began to spread all across the nation, and both sides of the war used them to their advantage.
A Civil War is a battle between the same citizens in a country. The American Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865 to determine the independence for the Confederacy or the survival of the Union. By the time Abraham Lincoln was elected president in 1861, in the mist of 34 states, the constant disagreement caused seven Southern slave states to their independence from the United States and formed the Confederate States of America. The Confederacy, generally known as the South, grew to include eleven states. The states that remained devoted to the US were known as the Union or the North. The number one question that is never completely understood about the Civil War is what caused the war. There were multiple events that led to the groundbreaking, bloody, and political war.
Abraham Lincoln once stated “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Abraham Lincoln is a hero for the citizens of America because his determination and courage to ending slavery even if it meant war caused peace in this nation. Slavery was the vital cause of the American Civil War. The north and the south both had their differences on how to run the country. People in the North believed in unity and that slavery should not exist because “all men are created equally.” On the other hand, the South believed in continuing slavery. People tried to talk it out and come to a middle ground after both sides compromising, however that didn’t work and caused war. Ideological differences were a vital role to making the American Civil War an inevitable event.
Freedmen’s Bureau that helped distribute food, supplies, and land to the freed slaves, this remained a positive throughout the reconstruction. Furthermore positives added to the redevelopment of the south including Lincoln’s Ten-Percent Plan and the 13th and 15th amendment, which remained perserved. Lincoln’s plan agreed to allow each secessionist state to rejoin only after a new constitution was reestablished on their behalf. The majority of the Civil War reconstruction was a failure but there were few positives that kept hope alive for former slaves.
There has been much debate as to whether the Civil War could have been avoided or not. The Evansville Daily Journal argues that the Civil War was inevitable, but Alexander Stephens disagrees and proposes that the war could have been avoided. Stephen’s argument is superior to the Evansville Daily Journal one because it objectively talks about the recent changes in the United States, explains the different views between the North and South, and tries to convince people that a war is not necessary.
The United States began as a united country and the concept of America had revolved around unity and freedoms. However, when the north and the south began to view slavery differently, the United States changed forever. The north wanted African American slaves to be released as free men while the south wanted the keep slavery to work in the fields. The north wasn’t completely against slavery due to the fact that the north would get the cotton from the south which was picked by slaves which were used in factories. However, in the Blue Over Gray: Sources of Success and failure in the Civil War, George M. Fredrickson the author is expressing his thoughts on the advantages the north had such as greater population and resources. “The north’s advantages in manpower resources and industrial capacity were clearly overwhelming.”. In James M. McPherson’s article, Why the North Won explains the north's victory from a military perspective, he explains the north reason for victory and the souths reason for the loss. After the war, the articles in Hollitz express their thought on advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of the civil war to end slavery.
During the American Civil War, the Union was successful because of their numerous factories, population, and transportation. The Confederate was unsuccessful because of their economic failures. They started out strong and failed during the war during The Civil War. They could really only make cotton. The Union came up with a plan called the Anaconda Plan to shut down the Confederate economically and it worked. This plan was an idea to make the Confederate crumble economically. They used their navy to surround there harbors and the Mississippi to stop any imports or exports to the Confederate. The Union had more factories than the Confederate allowing them to be able to produce goods way faster. This also allowed them to make guns, clothing, and railroads. The union had more people fighting in the war giving them more troops to fight in battles, and all of the troops had supplies thanks to their numerous factories. The Unionerners had better transportation than the Confederate giving them the ability to travel through the country faster. This also allowed them to transport goods faster. The Union and the Confederate both had their strengths and weaknesses but at the end of the war the Union showed that they were stronger than the Confederate.
The lasting impact of the amendments enacted after the Civil War is that they have provided rules regarding voting and discrimination. In Exhibit G: Rice v. Cateyano, Harold Rice was denied his right to vote in the OHA trustee election because he did not have the requisite ancestry to be a “Hawaiian” under state law; however, this ruling was overturned by the Supreme Court, since it violates the 15th Amendment. This shows that the 15th Amendment impacted the country after the Civil War because it states that all U.S. citizens, no matter their race, can vote, which is still important to remember today. In Exhibit E: Yick Wo v. Hopkins, San Francisco’s Board of Advisors refused to give a mandatory laundry permit to any Chinese owners; Yick Wo
“A house divided against itself cannot stand.”1 These words, spoken by Abraham Lincoln, foreshadowed the war that became the bloodiest in all of the United State's history. The Civil War was a brutal conflict between the North and South; brother against brother. With slavery as the root cause, Southern states had seceded from the Union and were fighting for their independence. They became the Confederate States of America (CSA) and were a force to be reckoned with. The Union, however, put up a fierce struggle to preserve the country. If the Civil War was to be a war of attrition, the North had the upper hand because of its large population, industrialization, raw materials, railroad mileage, and navy. But if the war was short lived, the
The civil war, fought from 1861-1865, was started after seven southern slave states declared their secession and formed the Confederate states. The Union had many advantages that, ultimately, led them to victory. The had many political, economic, and military benefits that aided them in their victory.
For generations, the saying has always been “winning is not everything.” For most cases, yes, winning is not what it is all about. There are, however, occasions when winning is a necessity. The American Civil War was a “brother against brother” fight over the issue of slavery in the South. Although allowed in the country farther back than the establishment of the nation, slavery was a part of the citizens of the United States’ lifestyle. Many Northerners felt that slavery was an abomination. The country had to come to an agreement on this issue. The only agreement they felt would resolve everything was going to war with one another. One might feel that the real winner was the Northern part of the country, the Union, and the real losers were
Jim was brought up as a Methodist. He became quickly fascinated with the pulpit oratory. Vera Price, a childhood playmate remembers, ”He’d always be the preacher, standing up making sermons”(Axthelm 54). Even at the young age of seven Vera, recalls Jim’s speeches encouraging strict discipline. She remembers occasions when Jim was playing with other children and “he’d hit them with a stick and make them cry. He had a power that most boys don’t have”(Axthelm 54). As Jim matured into a young adult this internal power he possessed was not fully matured. In high school Jim was in the popular crowd, but never the leader of the pack. “Only in retrospect does anyone claim to have spotted seeds of the horror to come.’ I had a hunch something bad was going to happen to him,’ says a middle-aged man in Lynn. He was smart as a whip. But he had some strange ideas. He never fit in with the town. He was different”(Axthelm 54).
1865 was a year filled with hardships for the United States. Changes to the constitution were made, businesses formed, and leadership changed. This was also a year of controversy, dealing with racism. The United States’ strength was tested and proved to be strong with the end of the Civil War on April ninth. 1865 was an important year because of the Civil War, economic changes, and politics.
The Roman Republic was a system of procedures formed by tradition; there was no written constitution or legally binding legislation. Precedent and consensus set procedure creating the parameters for acceptable behaviour. However, it was near the end of the 2nd century BC, where the system began to deteriorate and fall, ultimately causing the civil war in 49 BC. The boundaries of acceptable behaviour were stretched by politicians such as Caesar and Pompey and as a result new perilous precedents were set. Violence along with the use of an army became a political tool in the domestic, political sphere. The civil war laid on the foundations that constitutional methods proved ineffective in the face of an inadequate aristocratic government and therefore Caesar and the senate lead by Pompey used violence and rebellion against each other in an attempt to stabilise the administrative system of government and essentially control Rome. Caesar himself ignited the civil war as a result of the unstable Roman Republic, major events such as rebellion and revolts, senate and the political sphere and the breakdown of the triumvirate, which fuelled the motive for civil war. The corrupted Roman system alongside with personal issues and disagreements became the catalyst for the civil war of 49 BC and consequently set the parameters for the new dictatorial Roman world.