The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Gun control has been a long debate to determine if it’s better to have stricter access to firearms. America is one of the few countries that has gun rights embedded in their constitution. But what makes the US exceptional is that it has the right to keep and bear arms, other countries do not provide the right to have access to them, but rather, the government is allowed to regulate its use. The right to bear arms has also been the cause of growing violence and crime, at least according to anti-gun lobbyists. Citizens should be aware the dangers and harm that guns present to society. Controlling the sale of firearms can greatly decrease the number of violent crimes.

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Courts have universally agreed, however, that the right provided by the Second Amendment is not absolute and that many kinds of gun legislation designed to protect public safety remain valid ("Gun Safety & Public Health," 2013). The ongoing debate between the gun rights versus gun control has caught more attention as number of cases involving gun violence increased significantly. In one study, it stated that major mental illnesses are associated with increased risk of violent act. In recent years, there were several news headlines on

Gun control is broken down and analyzed. The topic is generally discussed, talking about the concept of gun control laws and differences in these laws by state. The argument in favor of the topic is assessed from multiple different angles, and facts and sources are used to explain the general opinion of those that support gun control. Next, the other side is considered, with persuasive evidence and logic to prove the viewpoint that gun control is negative and harmful to the country. Aspects of the debate, such as conceal-carry permits and gun-free zones are discussed, and examples of crime stopped by citizens that possess a firearm are used to reinforce the main idea. Lastly, the article ends by considering other actions that could be

Gun Control is one of the most debatable topic in the United States for the past several decades. America has witnessed assignation to mass shootings. Every time violence and guns are a factor of traumatic events the ongoing topic of gun control reemerges. The question that is asked is if our nation should enforce stricter gun laws. Would these new gun laws contribute to the decrease of gun crime in our nation? American citizens stand divided on this issue; both sides taking a strong position as what they strongly believe what should be done about guns.

There are many Americans who are opposed and many who are for the control of firearms. Robert Farago is an author and publisher of thetruthaboutguns.com, in his article, “Gun control is not the answer: Opposing view”, he states that gun control laws won’t stop criminals from committing mass shooting or other crimes. Farago gives an example of how president Obama created more gun control laws but he goes on to saying that with or without laws, criminals are still going to shoot or rob innocent people. He also gives reasons on how a law cannot prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands. The main idea of this article is to persuade and inform American citizens that with or without gun control laws, crimes will keep occurring. Farago has a strong belief that gun control acts will not

Firearms are the cause of death for more than 31,000 people per year, making it the 2nd leading cause of death for people ages 15-24 (National Center for Injury Control and Prevention). As the debate over gun control continues to spread throughout the nation like the plague, everyone is trying to choose a side. Some argue that their Second Amendment Rights are being infringed on, however, when looked at in detail that is not the case. Many others argue the regulation of guns is not beneficial because criminals are okay with doing illegal things, therefore they will obtain guns anyway. There is much, however, to disprove that. These weapons are the reason why the United States has such a high rate of violence even with such high wealth. Criminals should not have the access they currently have to such destructive weapons. Gun control must be put in place in order to decrease much of the violence and death by firarem that the United States has.

For many years the controversial topic of gun control has sparked countless passionate debates. The arguments posed in these debates vary widely concerning the possible solutions to solving the problem of violent crime due to the possession of firearms. This paper introduces three different views concerning gun control. The first illustrates the freedom to own firearms. The second view advocates the complete restriction of firearms owned by citizens, and the last one presents a modified freedom of possessing firearms. Each faction seeks to have its position supported by national legislation.

Gun Control has been a long debated, and hot topic among the American population for many decades. The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution states that, “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”. Both sides of this debate have very logical arguments for increasing gun control or lessening gun control. These arguments tend to spike shortly after active shooter events, eventually having some type of legislature passed to prevent these atrocious acts from happening. But ultimately active shooter events continue to plague the United States, and much of the world.

Currently gun control has been amidst one of the most thought of debates not only in recent times, but also in prior occasions. The mass shootings occurring more-often lately have fueled the altercation pertaining to one subject, gun control. Gun control may have many different meanings, or descriptions varying from person to person. One may think that gun control is banning guns all together, banning a certain category of weapons, or banning certain items like high capacity magazines, and flash suppressors. All of these would be forms of gun control, but the true meaning of gun control, as stated by an online article What Gun Control Could Look Like, “Gun control would allow citizens in the United States to still purchase firearms, but there would be reasonable regulations on firearms” (Greenblat). This statement introduces the idea that gun control would not be banning guns, but banning items that are unnecessary for civilians to have possession of. Banning all guns cannot happen because it would be infringing upon the second amendment, the right to bear arms. The second amendment cannot be changed or challenged, but perimeters may be set to keep guns and people’s capabilities with them limited. A firearm in the hands of a criminal or someone with bad intentions is not good, but it can be prevented. Gun control needs to happen, or mass shootings and high rates of violence will continue to occur in society.

In this paper regarding gun control I will be using multiple sources to help support my argument. I will be the rhetor, with the help of other reputable sources and authors. The purpose of this paper is to show why gun control is something that is very much needed in America. There needs to be gun control, however, it does not mean people need to lose their right to own a gun. The audience of this article is republican politicians in the United States Government that are in charge of creating gun control regulations. This is the main audience because these are the people who can make changes to laws and policies to create safer gun distribution. In this paper I will show how gun control, without taking away the right to own a gun, can be achieved. This will be done by using facts, statistics, and by comparing American gun polices to gun policies of other countries.

There has been much controversy over gun control. The posing question is: will gun control help our country and should it be allowed? Some people believe that more laws and restrictions on the purchase of guns would help our country stay safer. Others claim that gun ownership is a constitutional right and that restricting access to guns violates this right. The debate about gun control should not be taken lightly, for the lives of the American public are at stake. Gun control is not the answer. Our nation needs to closely look at what motivates individuals to use guns for killing, and find methods to solve the underlying problem. This will ultimately keep the people of the United States safe.

Gun control is a very highly debated topic in today’s day and age. With all the recent mass shootings, supporters call for more gun control and even for the government to ban "assault weapons". Supporters of a ban say that assault weapons are classified as weapons with one or more military features such as a high capacity clip or a folding stock (Lott 1). Opponents argue that this will take defense weapons out of the hands of law abiding but it will do little for stopping criminals. Mental health also plays a large role in the debate as almost 60% of mass shootings are conducted by someone who has history of being mentally ill (Lott 1). In this paper I will go further into the gun debate topic to try and further your knowledge on assault weapons.

“The growing sense among many Americans that no one was safe from unpredictable gun violence fueled the debate over gun control,” (Baughman, par. 4). Gun control is a term referring to the set of law or policies that regulate the usage of firearms by civilians. In the early history of the United States, Congress passed a bill, known as the Second Amendment, which protects one of America's most controversial freedoms: the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Benson, par. 3). When it was signed it into law times were dangerous, and the “right to bear arms was initially related to the need to arm militias (citizens organized for military service) that could protect states from attack by foreign powers” or tyranny (Benson, par. 5). Today, the United States has the highest number per capita as well as a total number of guns in the world. Some citizens feel as if weapons are too easy to attain, and, due to the poorly structured weapon system, more shootings have occurred. However, people who oppose gun control argue that guns are not the problem, but the people who have them are. The topic of gun control is hotly debated because it includes the issues of violence and as well as issues of personal defense. Gun control must be more strictly composed through more thorough criminal background checks and analytical interviews of people buying guns, thus preventing those with criminal records or with malicious intent from purchasing a weapon.

Gun control has become an ever growing topic that has taken both opinionated and debated standpoints throughout various places such as courtrooms, widespread media influence and even discussions at a dinner table. Gun control can be defined as; laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms. The underlying question is what is the ultimate effect of gun control? Does it reduce the amount of crimes that occur? Or does the increase in regulation and creation of stricter laws when it comes to firearms; create a rise in crime all together? Debating which is considered politically correct is a controversy that can be argued time after time.

Because they don’t know what else to do, many people believe eliminating guns would solve the problem of 30,000 Americans dying due to shootings. However, these gun control advocates do not look at all the statistics. Firearms are also tools of self-defense, not only tools of murder. Stories of self-defense are far less common than the gun crime stories that generally make the headlines. However, according to criminologist Dr. Gary Kleck, there are “2.5 million cases of guns used for self defense annually, compared to 0.5 million gun crimes” (qtd. in Loesch 219). This means that firearms were used five times more to defend against crimes than to commit crimes. Another researched report done by the United States Centers for Disease Control and