The Pros And Cons Of Nasa

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) is one of the leading organizations in space technology and research. In the past 60 years, NASA has sent numerous satellites, telescopes and crew modules into space. Despite drawbacks in launch failures and lack of funding, NASA continues to focus on its mission in space exploration and technological advancement. One of NASA’s projects is to explore deep space, in which entails a manned missions to Mars, exploration of the asteroid belt, and beyond. With these goals in mind, NASA has engineered new rocketry and even created a program to better allocate costs of such conquests. With these new advancements, NASA has created a new age of how space travel is carried out.

NASA(National Aeronautic and Space Administration) Is america’s space program but we also have another private company called SpaceX which is owned by Elon Musk. The average Nasa space shuttle launch ran about 1.2 billion dollars. Yet, a rocket launch from SpaceX’s largest rocket costs about 90 million dollars While this is still a considerable amount of money it is still a fraction of what the space shuttle would use. Even Nasa new rocket that they are developing will cost a projected 500 million dollars per launch. Another thing that makes SpaceX’s rockets so cheap is that they have recently became reusable as of June 25,2015. Nasa has been surrounded in controversy since the first moon landing. People believe it was faked by the government

In the past 50 years, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has sent out many planned space exploration missions which have lead to numerous advantages in society and culture. NASA’s technologies benefit American lives with the innumerable important breakthroughs by creating new markets that have spurred the economy and changed countless lives in many ways. NASA is a federal agency and receives its fundings from the annual federal budget passed by the United States Congress. However, there are conflicting opinions that consider whether or not funding for NASA is a waste of government spending.

NASA design and send unmanned probes in space because they are cheaper to make, they don’t need to carry food, water or oxygen and they can live in any atmosphere. Although it is very difficult to repair probes due to the long distance from the Earth and there is no human on Mars to repair probes. If probes die in space, NASA don’t have to worry about it bringing back but if human dies NASA have to bring them back to Earth which is really

NASA has taken many giant leaps in spaceflight since Neil Armstrong first stepped on the moon: The International Space Station was built, multiple rovers were sent to Mars, a spacecraft has landed on an asteroid, and we even have pictures of Pluto for the first time. NASA has accomplished some incredible projects that have inspired many and benefited the entire world with the research it has found. Unfortunately, it has recently encountered some setbacks that make it nearly impossible for the administration to continue in these ambitions. Due to cost, interests, and efficiency, it is time for the private sector to take control of the future of spaceflight.

Listeners, if you would name the most renowned and fascinating achievement that NASA has ever committed, I presume you would answer the Apollo moon landing, which is during the Apollo era, however, did you know that the Apollo program is actually the peak of NASA spending at approximately 4.5% of the federal budget, spending estimately 32.5 billion dollars it is the most expensive era in NASA history. Yet later in 2010 the spending of NASA dropped down from 4.5% to 0.5%. Clearly America’s interest in developing exploration in space is declining.

Putting the argument of UFO existence aside, it should come as no surprise that NASA lies to the public. Their excuse is to protect secret projects from competing countries many many believe the intense classification has a deeper purpose.

Human space exploration certainly has its advantages over robots in several ways. The first of such is that humans are capable of on-the-spot decisions and critical thinking. Humans are able to adapt and respond to unforeseen circumstances while robots simply cannot. Such a thing is evident in the robotic Viking mission to Mars. Detailed by the article "The Future of Space Exploration -Manned or Robotic Missions," the Viking landers on Mars were equipped with tools to sample the Martian soil and a small chemistry lab to detect whether or not the soil contained life.

“NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world 's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget” stated, famous scientist, Bill Nye. For years, NASA has been working on new technology to get the humankind into the great beyond. There has been a great debate if NASA and other space programs are even worth putting a great deal funding into anymore. Trillions of dollars have been funneled into NASA and other space programs by the government. There are many people who argue that this funding is not necessary and should be put in other places like to fund for jobs or put into finding a cure for cancer. Space exploration has many benefits and should continued to be funded. Some benefits are that space exploration quenches humans thirst for knowledge, creates many advances in technology, and strengthens our economy.

During long term space flight the human body must fight through some very tough situations. Humans have evolved and were built to live in the environment we live in now and that means humans are built to live with earth’s gravitational pull. Along with this, earth’s atmosphere is a layer of protection that humans evolved with. During human space flight, both of these factors are taken out of the equation and humans begin to be faced with zero gravity and are forced to be without the protection of the earth’s atmosphere. The effects that astronauts endure include bone density loss, muscle loss, sensory motor issues, cardiovascular issues, radiation issues, and even psychological issues (Roberts, 2013).

What has NASA really even done for us? We have sent off satellites and been to the moon. That an amazing accomplishment, but how did that benefit me? Well the benefits aren’t as clear as most other research endeavors. NASA doesn’t directly contribute to society, the products and methods they use bleed over into everyday functions. This is because they need high specific tools and methods to accomplish task that are otherwise impossible. Through funding they are able to dig into different areas in order to develop these tools to help with space travel. Ask anyone in business, creating a new product is extremely expensive and could result in failures. While this holds true for NASA research as well the likely hood is reduced due to having some of the most highly educated people doing the research. This allows the planning phase of most ideas be worked through in a more rigorous fashion in order to flush out any potential issues. A big issue I see right now is the fact that while there is funding there isn’t enough to make a difference. I know that isn’t a profound statement, but think about it. NASA is receiving just enough funding to maintain the current status quo. This means we are already funding the majority of the money needed, if we were able to section off more money they would be able to actively pursue other endeavors, and would thus generate more idea and products for us

NASA’s problems with funding that caused the failure of the Landsat commercialization continued into the future, causing an increase in dependence on foreign and commercial launch vehicles. NASA continued the downward trend of its funding, into the 1990s, even after seeing a brief jump during the Bush administration. (Kring) From 1962, NASA had provided the framework for commercial companies to enter into the world of spaceflight, when Kennedy signed into law the Communications Satellite Act of 1962. (Communications Satellite Act of 1962) This act provided the framework for private companies to design, manufacture, and operate their own satellites, while still only offering their launch services on the Saturn V, THOR, Atlas, and Antares rockets.

Space: the final frontier. The opening words to the TV series Star Trek seemed to carry the hopes and dreams of a generation. After all, their generation had done what seemed impossible – land men on the moon and bring them back to earth safely. Anything seemed possible – even sending men to mars. Today, our space program is just a shell of what it once had been. No longer do we have the means to send man to the moon – in fact, we don’t even have the means to send man into orbit anymore. In 2011, President Obama approved a proposal to cut the budget of NASA, effectively shutting down the Space Shuttle Program. This trend is anything but new – the percentage of money we spend on NASA has been decreasing year after year. In 2013, NASA’s budget was $16.8 billion, a paltry 0.49% of our total federal budget (and less than the citizens of the U.S. spend on pizza per year). This is a sharp decrease from even a decade before, when NASA spending accounted for 0.68% of the budget, and incredibly distant from NASA’s all time high percentage of our budget – 4.41%, in 1966. Many argue that the cut in funding is justifiable; after all, the nation is over $18 trillion in debt, and any way to reduce the deficit is helpful, especially for non-vital programs. However, I believe that NASA should receive more federal funding to continue expanding and funding research and space exploration programs, as the benefits of the space program outweigh the amount spent.

Has NASA really benefited any of us when $3 billion of taxpayer money? The annual of budget of NASA is $18.724 billion and that being used on golf-club testing and studies on how humans will react to meeting aliens. While these unnecessary projects are being held, millions of people are dying of diseases. That money could be used on books for classrooms, medicine for the sick, and food for the hungry. Space can hold many answers for many different problems, but if the money being used to send robots up to space can be used to help with the cure of diseases then why are not scientists being more intelligent with their spending? Why is the President giving NASA such a huge budget when it is being used on useless projects? Space can wait. NASA is using millions, even billions of dollars on visiting space to go into caves to explore. Yet, the discoveries that scientists are making have yet to help us. There are people starving in this world with no money and NASA is worried about sending a robot into outer space. Money and government leniency is an issue in America and no one seems to be

In reality, is NASA’s budget really all that much? It comprises merely 0.5 per cent of the United States of America’s annual federal budget of around 3.5 trillion dollars. (7) It is almost nothing when compared to the 737 billion dollars per year spent on Defense. (6) Wouldn’t that part of the national budget be better to chip away at?