Tele-transportation
Parfit is known for his hypotheticals involving a potential future technology, tele-transportation. This technology is essentially a machine that allows objects and people to teleport to other locations. In Parfits scenarios, humanity has reached a point in its technological history that humans now must travel to Mars in a timely matter. To avoid months aboard a space shuttle on a trip from Earth to Mars, a tele-transporter is utilized. Parfits tele-transporter scans the body and mental states, saves and transports the data to another location, destroys the original body, and recreates the body and mental states from new materials. In both scenarios there are cautions passengers who are nervous that they will soon be wiped
…show more content…
There are those who feel as both scenarios mean certain death of the self. These views are a result of feelings, such as the uneasiness of being recreated with different materials than those biologically and naturally created without human intervention. Others argue that there cannot be a continuation of consciousness when being transported, and therefore, there cannot be a continuation of the self. These two arguments are attacking from different sides of the self-debate. Those worried about the specific materials used to recreate the biological body are focusing sentimentally on the human body carrying their consciousness. The human body is continuously regeneration cells, and therefore has a complete set of new cells, or materials, every seven years . Therefore, there should not be any ill felling when regarding to an instantaneous exchanging of cells. On the other side, those worried about the continuous of consciousness, rightfully see that the contents of consciousness are the necessary aspects of the self. Stephen King answers this point in his short story, The Juant. When forcing passengers to sleep, an unconscious state, before scanning the body and mental state, passengers will be transported while in a less conscious, or unconscious state. This should be seen as falling asleep in a car parked in the driveway and waking up when you reach the destination. However, there is a weaker case that allows the …show more content…
He illiterates this claim by a thought experiment involving torture. In this hypothetical Williams tells individuals that they will be tortured at noon the following day. Naturally everyone feels uneasy about this. In order to easy this feeling, Williams tells those waiting to be tortured that before noon the individual’s entire memory will be erased. Williams argues that if memory is necessary for personal identity, this news should put any feelings of uneasiness to rest. When asked, the individual still reports feeling uneasy about the torture. Williams repeats this process altering the scenario from amnesia to exchanging the memories of the individual who will be torured for those of another. Again when prompted the individual still feels uneasy about the torture. Williams claims that this is proof of the body being just as necessary as the memories. However, this is not a fair analysis of the situation. When the individual is told of their torture as a matter of fact, it is a natural reaction to feel uneasy. This is similar to feeling anxious about a public speaking event that unexpectedly gets canceled right before taking the stage. There will remain a sense of anxiety until the event causing that feeling is gone. Likewise, the feeling of unrest will remain present until the moment of memory loss. This therefore fails as an example to increase the importance of the body in regards to
He next argues that the requirement of memories is not a pertinent way to establish humanity. He states that very young children or those who have experienced memory loss would not be considered human under that definition because they have no memories (Noonan, 2012, p. 470). This argument is weak because those with memory loss did form memories, even if they have since lost them. New research also suggests that young children might actually be
In the “Second Night” of Perry’s Dialogue, Miller argues that memories are what determines personal identity. He began with the idea that if he were to take a person to the stretch of the river and then later come across a different stretch of the river, it could be classified as the same river. He believes that the judgement of personal identity are referred to the parts(stretches of the river) and how they are judged to be connect in certain ways. He then argued that all you need in order to survive after death is to imagine a later person who is in heaven with all the memories that had happened in your present/past. These memories can only be considered real if they were experienced by the same person who had the memories. On page 30, Weirob
In the book “The Assault,” by Harry Mulisch, the author demonstrates how the main character, Anton, becomes free of the influence of his memories by showing that Anton's approach to memory changes over the novel course of the novel – from protective denial to acknowledgment. However, what remains static is a constant self awareness that Anton shows in-regards to his attempts to repress these memories. During the beginning of the novel (post-tragedy) Anton is a shell of his memories of the night where is family was killed. This is shown through how many details of his character, from major life aspects such as his wife or his job, to insignificant things such as what sorts of media he likes, can all be traced back to his allegedly forgotten memories. The
Bernard Williams replicates Locke's theory about personal identity through his very own body switching experiment. The experiment is about two bodies that are labeled person A and person B. In Williams argument the brains between person A and B are switched. Therefore, person A has person B's brain and vice versa.10 Before the switch takes place, there are two treatments that will take place. One person can get $100,000 while the other inevitably gets
“Memories I sometimes wish I could wash away, even though I am aware that they are an important part of what my life is; whom I am now” (Beah 19). Remembering things reminds him of who he is.
Paradoxes within this invisible rational framework begin to emerge, however. Because human senses are inherently limited and fallible and "memories are by their nature fragmented, isolated, and arbitrary," they are highly suspect in providing reliable evidence of rational structure to the progression of thoughts and experiences of any individual or group (53). Order can and will be made from the fragments available in a given situation; it is an extension of the most intense form of human will. "The world will be made whole For to wish a hand on one's hair is all but to feel it. So whatever we may lose, the very craving gives it back again" (153) Memory thus houses a great paradox: the ability to create a sense of completeness and the ability to provoke the most profound sense of loss. It is the paradox woven into the nature of memory which moves time forward. "The force behind the movement of time is a mourning that will not be comforted" (192). Based in part on her memories, Ruth begins to consider the idea that in committing suicide, her mother wanted to evoke a less absolute, constantly negotiated existence, "whole and fragment", within her daughters' minds (163).
“ Without memory, our existence would be barren and opaque, like a prison cell into which no light penetrates; like a tomb which reject the living.” Humanity can not without memory, if one person do not have memory, then the person is not complete person or the person lose the hope already. For author “hope without memory is like memory without hope” the memory and hope could not lack each one, if memory of anyone
What happens when our ability to process information is impaired and we are reduced to mere facts? Humanity is a fragile thing, as it can be summarized by the ability to hold compassion and exhibit sympathy. Jorge Luis Borges’ “Funes the Memorious” questions the idea of how the brain may process information. As a narrative, it is written for a memorial to Funes, who was a young man that tragically passed away. The narrator felt obligated to write something about him because of his strength and resilience. After he fell off his horse in an accident, Funes’ memory changed in a way that deemed him differently by society. He remembered everything in vivid detail, to the extent that he was unable to comprehend and interpret simple words. With only
Memories are works of fiction, selective representations of experiences actual or imagined. They provide a framework for creating meaning in one's own life as well as in the lives of others. In Toni Morrison's novel Beloved, memory is a dangerous and debilitating faculty of human consciousness. Sethe endures the tyranny of the self imposed prison of memory. She expresses an insatiable obsession with her memories, with the past. Sethe is compelled to explore and explain an overwhelming sense of yearning, longing, thirst for something beyond herself, her daughter, her Beloved. Though Beloved becomes a physical manifestation of these memories, her will is essentially defined by and tied to the
Loftus and Palmer support the reconstructive memory hypothesis. They believe that information gathered at the time of an icident is
Memories are information that the brain stores throughout people’s lives. The memories of a person is what shapes their lives and leaves an impression on other people’s lives as well. Without these memories, their lives would have been meaningless. In W. H. Auden’s “The Unknown Citizen,” it is evident that memories are important to really knowing a person. In the text, a eulogy is given by a government official for a citizen whose life is unknown. The official goes throughout the eulogy expressing how much the deceased was a “saint” by stating different facts from different government organizations about his life (line 4). Auden uses a sarcastic eulogy given by a government official to argue that people’s lives should allot to more than just facts and statistics about their lives.
He states the paradox between the idea that media are essential for the human memory and the idea that there isn’t anything purer than act of simple remembrance, something that media can potentially corrupt.
"Beam me up Scotty." You may know what movie this is from. Star Trek right? But teleportation isn't all of the Star Trek fun you think it is. Teleportation does not exist yet, but when (or if) it ever does, it can actually be pretty scary. What is teleportation? How will it work? What are the theories about it? How can it be harmful? To find out, you have some reading to do.
When the mind is transitioning to our body, the mind doesn’t complete the transition, making us fall into a deep lucid dream. A lucid dream is a vivid dream that looks real but in reality it’s just an illusion of what we see. Our state of mind, remains in a dark shattered expanse which looks like the universe. There is absolutely no energy for the mind to fully complete the transition. When the human body dies in the so called “life”, the mind disappears and a whole new cycle begins. This is called I am bored Right Now (Hi 789).
This process provides a framework to value anti-normative, embodied memories to unsettle the dominance of normative interpretations of Williams’s texts resulting from canonization.