The Pros And Cons Of Robotic Assisted Surgery

Ben-Or, S., Nifong, W., & Chitwood, W. (2013). Robotic Surgical Training. The Cancer Journal, 19(2), 120-123.

In today’s time of demand and supply of healthcare needs, organizations must discover or improve services that can meet the needs of patients’ whole at the same time generating revenue as well as achieving high standards for quality of care. One way organizations have done this is by investing in robotic systems to carry out a range of surgeries. In the following presentation I will discuss the topics of: Investing in the MAKO RIO Robotic System, The Utilization of the RIO Robotic System, Stakeholders

Al). This includes the increase in dexterity, the restore of proper hand-eye coordination, and improvement of visualization (Meyers et al.). In Cameron Scott’s article from the Healthline News, “Is da Vinci Robotic Surgery a Revolution or a Ripoff?,” he states that robotic devices including the da Vinci surgical device succeeds well in urology and the removal of prostate. Prostate removal is extremely difficult for open surgery practice, however the da Vinci made is easier with about 90 percent of these kinds of surgeries are now done robotically (Scott). Some evidence even suggest that with robotics used in prostatectomy, there is less blood loss, faster recovery, and fewer internal scarring (Scott.). There are many other examples from hospitals and manufactures that support the uses of robotic surgery and its benefits. However, even though these new technologies of robotic devices are supposedly be helping patients and making surgeries less invasive, they are still many concerns of how they should be properly regulated.

Technology has been advancing with the years, and it has changed how people live, communicate, travel, and learn. In particular, healthcare has changed due to the continuous technological advancements. Robotic advancements specifically have been transforming the health care industry. It is becoming noticeable that robotics are now being used for a variety of purposes in healthcare including drug making, moving supplies, administering drugs to patients, and monitoring patient vitals. A progressing form of robotics in healthcare is robotic surgery. One of the top functioning robotic surgery devices is the da Vinci Surgical System. Since 2000, surgical device has completed over 20,000 surgeries, which has set up the movement of using

As technology improves, surgical robots are rapidly gaining support among both doctors and patients across America. Today more than 900 hospitals have the da Vinci robot which is double the number in 2007. (Freyer, 2010) Da Vinci robots were first approved by the FDA in 2000 for prostate removal, but now da Vinci robots are used for a variety of other surgical procedures (Freyer, 2010). Robot assisted surgery offers advantages such as smaller incisions, reduced blood loss, less pain and faster healing time (Vijay, 2010), as well as making surgery less demanding for the surgeon. Robotic surgery involves many obvious advantages but the impact of cost, access, and quality must

Beginning from trephination which according to historians was the oldest operation performed even in prehistoric times to minimally invasive operations with use of technology that have now become the norm in modern era, the field of surgery has evolved by leaps and bounds. Various aspects of technology assisted surgery have been dealt with in this paper along with the different types of technologies in use like computer assisted and robotic surgeries. Traditional and modern methods have been compared and their pros and cons have been discussed in detail along with the application of technology in various surgical branches.

The 21st century can rightfully be considered as the era of technology when the new inventions and discoveries will most likely affect all the segments of human life. At this point, some of the breakthrough inventions of our times have been in the medical field. Robotic surgery has become an almost common practice in the advanced medical world and new uses for robotic assisted surgery are everyday set in place. However, such developments also attract different interests and implications.

This robot would be put inside a person's body and the surgery would be performed through a remote control, used by a surgeon down on Earth. Being able to develop such technology would allow surgeries to not only be able to be conducted in space, but also in remote areas on Earth.

With the ever-expanding medical field, I believe the next breakthrough will be advancements in robotic assisted surgeries. While it exists today, and helps in certain routine medical procedure, there is a huge potential in this field of biomedical engineering. The current procedures entail the use of a robotic mechanism that copies the movements of a doctor on a microscale that allows for less invasive surgery. With an almost tripling amount of procedures being performed since 2007, the potential of the surgical system is indeed beneficial. With the implementations of the current system on a larger scale, the medical field will expand exponentially. As the procedures become more common, the cost will decrease as competition in the market

This paper explores the possibilities and innovations that make up the new field of surgical robotics. While there have been several advancements in technology for inside the operating room, non-so far have been so technologically advanced and useful as the Da Vinci surgical system. The Da Vinci is the only one of its kind on the market today, as in now being seen in more hospitals and surgery centers than ever before. Most surgeons are excited to be able to learn on such a new type of system, and with time and practice, also feel that the Da Vinci is extremely beneficial to their practicing of surgical medicine, for reasons that effect both the surgeon and the patient. Patient outcomes have been gradually increasing as the ways in which the Da Vinci system continues to be used.

The controversy on the mind of the hero’s or celebrities of robotic surgery, are within the medical professional community. The surgeons, universities and hospitals are that discussing. as well as attempts to prove, with no avail, that the addition of a robot to minimally-invasive surgeries (minimally-invasive surgery is surgical techniques limit the size of incisions needed and thus lessens wound healing time, associated pain and risk of infection), has improved their performance and results in the operating room. Though the medical community has become accustomed to this technology being included in the options a patient can select when a surgical procedure is necessary, most

Robotics would prove to be even more effective in more complex surgeries because the more complex a surgery, the more careful surgeons have to be. For the most complex surgeries, surgeons generally rely on hand drills to drill into the cranium, which adds hours to the initial two-hour mark. This length of time comes from the fact that sensitive structures must be avoided while gradually removing the bone before entering the brain. However, these structures are also avoided, and even more so, when the robotics are doing the drilling. This is a major standpoint of the development because it shows how the robotic drill can be just as gentle as a human while working 50 times faster. The robots are able to sense where the sensitive structures are based on how they are programmed. The surgeons and doctors are responsible for programming and so they would do as follows, for the procedure, a patient would be given a CT scan so that the nerves, major veins and arteries would be identified. Once their location is identified it would then be specified by a surgeon, who would program the machine. This programming would allow surgeons to establish a path as well as safety barriers. However, the fact that the surgeon has to program the machine, aforementioned brings in error. To counteract human error during

Robotic surgery is increasingly being implemented to overcome drawbacks associated with the use of conventional techniques such as laparoscopy, especially in complex procedures. However, despite holding significant promise, robotic surgery is associated with some clear disadvantages and robust evidence base supporting robotic assistance remains lacking[1].

Technology is transforming the medical field with the design of robotic devices and multifaceted imaging. Even though these developments have made operations much less invasive, robotic systems have their own disadvantages that prevent them from replacing surgeons all together. Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS) is a broad notion encompassing a lot of common procedures that existed prior to the introduction of robots. It refers to general procedures that keep away from long cuts by entering the body through small, usually about 1cm, entry incisions, through which surgeons use long-handled instruments to operate on tissue inside the body. Such operations are directed by viewing equipment and, therefore, do not automatically need the use of a robot. Yet, it is not incorrect to say that computer-assisted and robotic surgeries are categories that fall under minimally invasive surgery (Robotic Surgery, n.d.).

The beginning use of surgical robots within medical setting benefits the surgeon as well as the patient; it gives the da Vinci Surgical System a bright future within today’s society.