The Pros And Cons Of The Ultrasound

Before women had rights to decide whether they could keep their baby, some states didn’t allow abortion, therefore requiring women to give birth to their child. In today’s current issues, abortion is still a controversial subject with millions of people supporting it or not supporting it. Every woman has the right to make changes to her own physical body, and those rights should not be taken away, according to the constitution. In the very famous case in 1973, “Roe v. Wade”, the United States Supreme Court legalized abortion throughout the first trimester of pregnancy. In the article, “Roe’s Pro-Life Legacy”, it is explained how after this movement, the right to abortion, lives have changed and led to lower abortion rates (Sheilds 2013.)

One of the first moral issues addressed by both sides of the abortion debate concerns a pregnant woman’s so-called natural “right” to make “reproductive choices.” (“The Rights of Pregnant Women”) Anti-abortion advocacy groups claim that “the only way to actually protect the mother’s rights will be by enforcing laws that secure her child’s right to life,” (“Argument 2”) whereas pro-abortion groups contend that these laws “create a dangerous precedent for wide-ranging government intrusion into the lives of all women.” (“The Rights”) With two fundamentally contrasting viewpoints at odds with each other, it is apparent that one of the core issues concurrent with abortion is a woman’s rights versus the rights of her unborn fetus.

Abortion has taken the lives of more than 50 million babies since 1973 (“About Abortion”). The issue of abortion is one of the most common controversial issues in American politics and culture. In modern society, many women that have an unintended pregnancy and they result to abortion without researching other options. Abortion is not a substitute for birth control and this issue should be taken seriously. The individual woman needs to understand that by agreeing to have an abortion she is agreeing to kill an innocent fetus. Abortion rips the unborn child from his or hers right to life. Society needs to let women see through the eyes of the fetus and find alternative ways to raise the baby. Abortion should be

Ever since the case of Roe v. Wade in 1973, abortion has been one of the most contentious issues in our society. In some cases people think abortion is murder, in others, it’s reasonable for some cases. Then there are people who use it just to take advantage of it. The legal stance of abortion is a hot topic in today’s society.

Most recently the “no taxpayer funding for abortion act”, has abortion advocates reeling (Maguire, A-14). Even though, abortion has been legal in every state in the United States since the monumental Supreme Court decision, “Roe v Wade”, on January 22, 1973, there are fewer physicians willing to perform abortions today than in 2008 (Kraft, 09). At the heart of the ethical dilemma for many in the medical profession is the viability of the fetus (USA TODAY). And just to make this whole dilemma more confusing, according to the United States Government, “The child in utero, at any stage of development in the womb”, is protected by the Unborn Victims Violence Act of 2004 (Unborn Victims of Violence Act, A-1). Medical professionals have the

This utilizes two similar court cases, Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, and Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), in order to provide support for the second premise. In these cases, the Supreme Court approved the Federal Abortion Ban, which “outlaws certain second-trimester abortions and has no exceptions for cases when a woman’s health is in danger” (Abortion, p. 2). NARAL (2013) explains that these cases reason that “other procedures are available to women who would have undergone the banned procedure” (Abortion, p. 2), which can imply that the women are basically on their own to find a safe alternative to a traditional abortion if they may need one. To conclude this premise, NARAL (2013) states that because of the cases, women can be forced to continue carrying the child, even if it will be at the expense of either the mother or child’s health or life (Abortion, p. 2). The two cases used in this premise also provide sufficient evidence for this section of the

The right of a women to control her reproductive decision is highly debated in the US because of the idea that abortions, to some people, are considered murder. A woman’s ability to make reproductive choices is a fundamental right protected by the

Department of Reproductive Health and Research said,”What we see is that the law does not influence a woman’s decision to have an abortion.If there’s an unplanned pregnancy, it does not matter if the law is restrictive or liberal”.Equally important is the things that can occur to unwanted children that come to this

Catherine Mill argues that obstetric ultrasound has some impacts upon the embodied experience of pregnancy. For her, Ultrasound does not simply represent an already existing body, but actually constitutes the foetus as an embodied, social being. The basic question whether abortion is morally right or wrong enters into another domain through an analysis of biopolitics of reproduction. The routine use of ultrasound in obstetrics has its impact on the intuitions about the moral status of the foetus. ultrasound plays a significant role in the circulation and realization of norms in reproduction by establishing and shaping embodiment and thereby constitute social and ethical relationships. Ultrasound imaging allows the bodily life of the foetus

“Excessive restrictions stigmatize women seeking abortions and discriminate against those who lack the knowledge and understanding of legal grounds for abortion and vulnerable groups, such as poor and rural women and girls” (Finer). Abortion is commonly known as a murderous crime in which a mother chooses to terminate her child, but I do not view abortion that way. Abortion is when a mother determines that she is not capable to raise a child at the moment. I believe that tougher abortion laws should not be passed because it should be a women’s basic right to her own body, also, many women do not have the financial resources it takes to raise a child, and either way women will still seek illegal ways to get an abortion with risky outcomes

The first technique I will suggest to use is Ultrasound. Because it is one of the safest to use and it does not use any radiation that would affect her from having children in the future. Furthermore, the evidence to support this idea of using an Ultrasound is because it only uses high frequency sound waves to create an image that will then be shown on video screen. Ultrasound also uses a device called transducer that contributes sound waves and grasp the echoes as they bounce off the organs. This echoes will then be improved by a computer into black and white images. This procedure can show masses of tumours growing in the liver, which can be tested for cancer.

Ultrasound has been used in obstetrics for over fifty years and is generally regarded as being very safe for both mother and fetus. However, there is also some limited research to suggest that ultrasound – especially when combined with certain influencing factors – may in fact carry potential to harm the fetus. The character of these potential risks range from relatively harmless effects to those that could result in more serious negative outcomes. When considering the available data, the potential for these adverse effects seems very low, but the rapid advancement of ultrasound technology and protocol in recent decades makes it difficult to be sure of the true consequences. Although ultrasound is generally considered to be safe, there is not currently enough evidence to prove definitively that modern obstetric ultrasound does not carry potential risks to the fetus, and so this technology should be used prudently with efforts taken to minimize its potential risks.

Recent legal movements and rules are being placed within the practice of maternal mothers with focus on the protection of the fetus as a separate entity from the woman. These legalities are said to question the rights of the pregnant woman about her own medical care and decisions. The new protective actions for the fetus will enforce criminal charges on women who behave in a way that is associated with fetal harm or adverse perinatal outcomes. The ethical dilemmas with maternal decision making are being approached because it “constrains the pregnant woman’s decision making by punishing them which erode a woman’s basic rights to privacy and body integrity.” (ACOG, 2011) The technological advances of current imaging, testing, and treating of

We have been practicing veterinary medicine since 1900 BCE but have made more progress in the last hundred years because of modern technology. Without modern technology, more and more animals would die each year. Two major tools that have made practicing vet science less dangerous are ultrasounds and laparoscopic procedures.

First, ultrasound works like real-time imaging. It allows for patients to see first hand how their injury looks. Ultrasound is the first imagining technology that allows for live feedback. As Doctor Kruse, a Doctor at Primary Care Sports Medicine at the University of California Irvine, said, “Being able to move the tendon and move the joint and move the muscle helps. When we're looking at a ligament in the elbow and there's evidence of a possible tear, the comparative piece of being able to look at the other healthy elbow. And that's real time you can't do that with an MRI you can't do that with an x-ray”. Real-time imaging is a breakthrough in the field of orthopedic medicine. For doctors this is a great because now doctors have the ability