The Purpose Of An Incident Response Plan

The incident response policy is very useful as it offers guidance on how to handle the situation when data has been breached. Through the policy security experts can restore the situation to normal and ensure that business runs again as usual without incurring to much losses due to time wastage. The policy gives clear guidance of the tasks and activities that should be carried out by the employees and the managers including procedures, reporting and feedback mechanism (Butler, 2015).

There are three main factors that need to be addressed when examining physical and technical security. These are prevention, detection of threats, and finally the recovery of systems. Prevention’s goal is to stop breaches and thieves before they even have a chance to make a move. Prevention is one of the main goals of all cybersecurity. This prevention will be the first line of defence. Detection ensures that if the protections are breached that the cause and effect will be identified. These detections also help in changing the company’s security policies. Finally, is recovery is the way that the breaches are addressed. All systems affected will be restored in some fashion and further changes will be made to policy and documentations. If there is any physical damage, it will be fixed.

The National Response Framework also known as NRF was built off of the National Incident Management System. The NRF plan was finalized and in action in January of 2005, right after Hurricane Katrina. NRF is an organization that is used prepare and respond to emergencies and terrorist attacks, they also help respond to disasters that happen all over the world, they help make sure that people get what they need in emergencies and they make sure that any medical care that is need in time of a disaster is provided.

The entire company will benefit from the incident response plan. However, those who are directly involved in the incident process will find this document to be the most helpful. This incident response plan will be a primary resource to the Chief Information Security Officer, all those who are a part of the Incident Response Team, and anyone else deemed necessary to complete the many facets of this plan. In order to lead a successful recovery process, it is the responsibility of all those involved to fully understand the importance of confidentiality, integrity, and availability of Zara’s assets, especially this document. While the preparation components to this plan should be established prior to an incident, the plan will not fully come into effect until the Chief Information Security Officer declares a disaster has occurred. The steps

The investigation after an incident allows the organization to identify the attacker, tools used in the attack, the vulnerability that was exploited, and the damage caused by the attack. This post-mortem

Both the national response framework and National Incident Management system are plans set in place to provide a response to domestic incidents and both are overseen by the Federal Emergency Agency. While they are both similar they do have distinguishing characteristics (Haddow, G., Bullock, J, & Coppola, D. 2014). The National Response Framework incorporates a formal plan that involves both local, state, federal, and non-government agencies that works seamlessly together to provide a response that if followed properly can be proven to have a successful ending to an emergency situation. The most important concept behind the National Response Framework is that Federal Government does not supersede local government and combines the government

An Incident Response Plan is documented to provide a well-defined, organized approach for handling any potential threat to computers and data, as well as taking appropriate action when the source of the intrusion or incident at a third party is traced back to the organization. The Plan identifies and describes the roles and responsibilities of the Incident Response Team. The Incident Response Team is responsible for putting the plan into action.

The “Critical infrastructure, or CI, is a subcategory of infrastructure that includes those assets, systems, and networks, whether physical or virtual, which are so vital that their failure or destruction would have a debilitating impact on security, governance, public health and safety, public confidence, commerce, or other societal factors” (Bullock, Haddow, Coppola, 2016). According to the 2013 US National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) there are 16 of these sectors and throughout this paper we will discuss a cyber attack on the water supply sector. The best way to discuss the above will be through the evaluation of the impact that a cyber-attack could have on our water supply, and the probable third and fourth order effects from

First, Incident Response (IR) plan “is a detailed set of processes and procedures that anticipate, detect, and mitigate the effects of an unexpected event that might compromise information resources and assets.” (Whitman, 2013, p. 85). Consequently, Incident response planning (IRP) is the planning for an incident, which occurs when an attack affects information systems causing disruptions. On the other hand, Disaster Recovery (DR) plan “entails the preparation for and recovery from a disaster, whether natural or human-made.” (Whitman, 2013, p. 97). For instance, events categorized as disasters include fire, flood, storm or earthquake. Thus, the differences between an Incident Response (IR) plan and a Disaster Recovery (DR)

As an official I use a S.W.O.T analyses of our event, and communicate with the public and the media for a clear and transparent agenda that is safe and organized for the public.

The incident response team should be alert on any clues as they begin gathering evidence from different sources. If the incident is from a Federal organization there is specific guidance on how the incident should be handled. For example, Federal agencies must by law have an incident response plan so most likely there should be a plan. Evidence should be gathered following protocol as directed in the plan. If the law firm is not a Federal agency, an incident response plan should be sought and the steps should be followed. Else, the steps should follow closely the Searching and Seizing Computers and Obtaining Electronic Evidence in Criminal Investigations guidance.

In order to diminish both security and privacy risks to organizations, measures need to be taken to combat risks throughout the various stages of the threat’s life cycle. Specific processes must be implemented to identify threats, procedures to follow when the attack occurs, and finally methods to recover from the attack (Houlding, 2011).

received from one financial institution to another. Lastly the Safeguards Rule states that financial institutions must design, implement and maintain a security plan to ensure the confidentiality and integrity of the consumer’s personal information. Of course there are always things that consumers can do to keep their information safe as well. Things from password protection, encryption, antivirus software and going to safe websites online are all useful tools to keep you from risk. However to keep minds at ease banks have developed Incident Response Teams. The team is actually “more of a detection control since its goal is to protect the reputation of the organization” (Elson and Leclerc). Its roles are to handle all security incidents and

An Incident Action Plan [IAP] is defined as “an oral or written plan containing general objectives reflecting the overall strategy for managing an incident” (Maniscalco & Christen, 2011). Additionally it is a crucial part of the Incident Command System [ICS].

The security incident management policy of Blyth’s Books is quite comprehensive in the aspect of the detection and reporting of information security events. Detection and reporting of a security incident is vital for an organisation’s survival. If an organisation’s stakeholders and employees cannot detect when an incident has occurred or have detected one but cannot report owing to the fact that how and whom to report to is unknown, the remainder of the incident management procedure which is aimed at getting the organisation back on its feet information security wise cannot be put into process. No one can handle or respond to an incident they have no knowledge of. The security incident management policy of Blyth’s Books was pretty comprehensive in outlining what security incidents are and how they could be identified by those covered in the scope of the policy. A review of Norwegian organisations and institutions performed in 2005 where strategies for data security incidents were analysed demonstrated that statistics