The Rachel Jeantel Case

Her trial, which started 10 months after the murders, was lead by what towns’ people called the “dream team” of lawyers. The jury had 12 men on it that believed that she was not guilty because after they showed her the skull of her father in court, she fainted, and because she was a girl. They thought that no girl was capable of committing such a crime.

Medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US, right behind heart disease and cancer. More than 200,000 people die annually as a result of diagnostic mistakes and negligence by healthcare professionals (Washingtonpost, 2016). In the healthcare industry, even the smallest mistakes and oversight could lead to severe consequences for both the patient and professionals. A healthcare professional would be held liable for any discrepancies that causes harm. The following case will analyze the ethical issue and negligence that lead to the death of an elderly woman.

There were many mistakes that was done in the Jonbenet case. They did a poor job into protecting the crime scene. The first responder even asked john and the neighbor to look all over the house for anything unusual. That is something you are not supposed to do, them looking around the house led to the body of Jonbenet and destroyed evidence. Former Boulder police chief, Mark Beckner, said that first off the police officers should have shut down the crime scene immediately and taken statements from JonBenet's parents. Since the crime occurred on Christmas Day, Beckner said that there were less people available to get to the scene. It took a long time after the murder, before police managed to conduct interviews with the Ramsey's, who had by

A reflective analysis on a case presented via a video tape of a simulated patient with a minor injury.

Melissa Barthelemy moved to the Long Island area in 2007 in order to start her own life. Over the two years that Melissa lived there, she was a prostitute and put ads for her service on Craigslist. She stayed close with her younger sister, Amanda, who still lived in Buffalo with their parents. Late on July 11, 2009, Melissa sent a text-message to her sister to confirm Amanda’s visit to see her in a couple days. During the day of July 12, 2009, a local bank had a recording of Melissa depositing one thousand dollars into her account, believed to be from a “date” she had the previous night. Before she left, she withdrew one hundred dollars. The last time that Melissa was seen alive was the afternoon of July 12, 2009 sitting outside her apartment

jury ruled her not guilty, but I do not see how with all the evidence that they had. With the

I would go for a targeted communication strategy to each of the different stakeholders. The first one will be to Jessica’s parents to re-explain the true nature of these unfortunate circumstances. I would explain to them the entire process and where we went wrong and apologize. I would also convey that the unfortunate circumstances were not specifically targeted at them but it was a bad lapse in the entire process and while we can help at this particular time with your daughter, we will reevaluate the entire process to ensure that nothing like that ever happens again. I would also inform them that from now on, to reflect the changing demographics in the area the hospital covers, the hospital will be offering language classes to all their staff to better communicate with people from different social and cultural

her privates. This evidence was brought to trial on May 20th along with two dozen more depositions

Rachel Jeantel would probably be found guilty because of her attitude towards the questions she is being asked. She looked as if she didn’t want to be there and as if she didn’t even care about the situation at all. When the man asked her questions about the case, when she answered him, she didn’t give them the right amount of information and she didn’t pronounce her words as she should have. She didn’t make any sense at all and I know the jury said something about that also. George Zimmerman should be found guilty, but according to the information that Ms. Jeantel gave out, the jury thought the opposite. To me, the jury knows that George was wrong for what he did to that innocent bystander, but Rachel didn’t give out the information that

The case of Nancy Troy and her family is undoubtedly complex and will necessitate a clinician with the ability to evaluate and address multiple dimensions of Nancy Troy and her family 's lives. It will be critical for a social worker to assess the family structure, the impact of violence, trauma, mental illness, and substance abuse, and finally, cultural considerations in order to address all the needs and areas of improvement presented by the Troy family.

In order for a trial to be brought, the police and prosecutors might be able to prove that the elements of the particular offence are present. In this criminal case both Actus reus, Mens rea as well causation was clearly shown through the behavior of Katherine Knight.

She had been sending people to jail for murder and DUI left and right, but not Ethan. He only gets probation and counseling. The sentence did not do justice to the pain and suffering that the families affected had to go

-Working with Mary, I feel that one barrier that she is facing in regards to her expressing/accepting her sexual orientation and gender identity is fear of being rejected and shamed by her family. Evidence suggests that for LGBTQ young adults, a heightened level of

I believe that all of the circumstances were not fully explained to Erma. As for Erma she was a single mother of two that was arrested. Erma at the time did not know what she was being arrested for. Erma put her faith into who her court-appointed lawyer was. What she later found out the lawyer who represented her gave her no time at all. The other disappointing part was in the video when they asked her appointed lawyer about Stewart’s case, he said he had no knowledge of representing her as his client. Even though his name was on her plea agreement. Though what her court-appointed lawyer did not explain was that he didn’t explain all of the repercussion of taking the guilty pleas. Though in the end this cases was very unethical, and the worst

Saving Rachel is a scary, funny, roller coaster ride through hell, with twists, and turns that will slap your face and suck you in! This will open your eyes of wisdom and knowledge in dealing with your emotions.