Barbara Ehrenreich is responding to the outsourcing of local news, writing to describe what is taking place in different areas. On the other hand, Fareed Zakaria is writing “The Rise of the Rest” to help people imagine that the world isn’t really falling apart. Just because there are other countries only growing bigger. This is when Ehrenreich is saying that jobs are being taken away and is helping people understand that Zakaria’s facts could be arguable. To begin with, Barbara Ehrenreich, the writer of “Your Local News - Dateline Delhi” is about this lady explaining her personal insights about outsourcing. She was focusing on a frame that showed historical trends in outsourcing, showing a series of turning points in the US about jobs being pushed out of the country and into others. She explained how, yes, maybe other countries are getting larger to, but also that doesn’t have to mean that the US is getting smaller. Ehrenreich stated “No, I don’t resent the Indians for moving in on the kind of work that I do...next time they should just get the idea of cost savings and go for the CEO’s job.” (609-610) Maybe what she meant by this was since jobs are spreading world wide, she doesn’t mind if others try out for it, but she believes that they shouldn’t just go out for the first spot that is open, they should try something that is more paying and maybe even more important. Fareed Zakaria, wants to help readers be interested in the knowledge of the world. He starts to
Barbara Ehrenreich uses very specific techniques (“moves”) to convey her message to her readers: for instance, the approach she uses in the first part of her essay is an ‘objective approach’ which relied upon citations from published works. She drew upon statistical data and information and used extensive quotations extracted from experts who have written on the subject. The other important device used in her essay (the other side of the same coin, so to speak) is the ‘subjective approach’ that she undertook to convey her message of “white-collar downward mobility.” Examples of the objective approach is found in this passage taken from the published work of the Bureau of Labor Statistics: “In Late 2003, when I started this project, unemployment
International relations is a topic that is constantly changing and can be very fragile. In the article, “Your Local News- Dateline Delhi” Barbara Ehrenreich, a respected journalist, shares her personal insights into the outsourcing of American jobs to foreign lands. Ehrenreich’s cynical attitude, use of dry humor, and rhetorical questions makes this daunting subject easier to take in. Fareed Zakaria, a well-known author, explains the globalized world and where outsourcing fits, in an excerpt from his book, The Post-American World. Zakaria looks back in history to show the reader how the world came to this “globalizing moment”, then he hypothesizes the future of the global economy by piecing together all of the elements. Ehrenreich shows
In addition to the present alternative organizations began to source their services to countries like Asian nation and China wherever staggering population makes the provision of low cost labor rather more convenient and as a result entire firms were outsourced to those places because of that it absolutely was the native labor that intimate with the malignancy of being axed from their firms. all told the economic chaos that followed within the backcloth of such depressing conditions it absolutely was the native labor that developed the best hostility for outsourcing as they squarely blame it for his or her impoverishment.
‘Is your job next?’ headline blared, followed by the disturbing preview of the article inside: “A new round of globalization is sending upscale jobs offshore. They include chip design engineering, basic research— even financial analysis. Can America lose these jobs and still prosper (R. Hira, 2008, p-1)?” The reaction of this news was swift and divided. Definitely large corporations that will be outsourcing will make huge profits in the long run but “what about the American citizens?”
As the world has gotten “smaller” in terms of trade, outsourcing has become a hot topic in much political and economic debate in the United States.
Ehrenreich states in the book that a “person with every advantage that ethnicity and education, health and motivation can” and will be able to survive in America (10). In America, there are certain advantages one has to get by and survive, yet not everyone gets to take that advantage.
One of the many rhetorical techniques Ehrenreich uses is syntactic repetition as a way of instilling emotions in a readers in order to make them feel sorry for the conditions low wage workers endure and then help in some capacity. In very first sentence of the article Ehrenreich lists; “At the beginning of June 1998 I leave behind everything that normally soothes the ego and sustain the body - home, career, companion, reputation, ATM card - for a plunge into the low-wage workforce” (Ehrenreich 243). In this quote Ehrenreich just lists facts of what she leaves behind but it makes a reader
While outsourcing may be beneficial to some of the companies partaking in it, the general consensus is that it ultimately proves to be harmful to the American workforce. The act of outsourcing and shifting many company call centers and technical support teams, or “low skill service jobs,” to foreign countries reduces jobs for those that could truly benefit from them within our own country. The unemployment rate has dramatically increased, and continues to rise, compared to what it has been in years past; yet there are numerous companies which still insist on handing over these “low skill service jobs” to people in other countries such as India. The most obvious and logical reason for outsourcing is reducing costs; people are working for
Barbara Ehrenreich’s essay, “Longevity Crisis? Kill Grandma,” is a very effective piece in its clever usage of humor and truth. A sarcastic beginning aims to highlight the issues which the author deems important and relevant to the aforementioned ‘longevity crisis,’ and simultaneously places responsibility on a variety of different companies. A transition to a more straightforward tone partway through solidifies the author’s point of view by critiquing the governing bodies themselves. Ehrenreich suggests that an outright pro-death policy might be better phrased as “a way of encouraging turnover … rather than death” (par. 10). She continues to argue that since the government is already effectively killing the older generations, the adoption
The debate over outsourcing in the U.S. is controversial among citizens and economists alike. There are many economists who believe that outsourcing is the next, most logical step in a free market economy (Mankiw & Swage, 2006). These economists believe that the market shifts according to supply and demand. An inherent feature of a free market economy is the free competition of goods and services where the goods and/or services go where the demand is the greatest. According to this view, there is a high demand for labor at a reduced cost and there is an almost endless supply of cheap labor overseas. An example of this would be that a call center attendant would be paid anywhere between twenty and twenty-five thousand dollars a year in compensation whereas the same worker in China would be paid approximately five thousand dollars in compensation per year (Mankiw & Swage, 2006). As anyone can see, there is a large difference between U.S. compensation and overseas compensation. These
They don’t have to worry about somebody in “Chinida” taking their job, because nobody can take away what they are giving away. They are the ones who keep outsourcing and not focusing on losing good workers, or even the effect it is having on the economy. It will always look like a good plan if it keeps putting money into their bank accounts, and gives the company a good image. Ehrenreich has similar thoughts “ I just hope the next time some managers get the idea of cost saving through outsourcing they go for the CEO’s job”(609). Her focus is that outsourcing wouldn’t be such a popular thing if the CEO’s jobs got taken away. They would finally know the struggle of everybody else who has been suffering through outsourcing of their jobs. Zakaria makes a good point when he writes “The next round of rising powers might not be so eager to ‘fit in’ “(616). He is hoping the next round of leaders would stop focusing on what everybody else is doing and quit trying to copy their ways and veer away to a different path. Both authors are saying the leaders of today’s focus is on trying to be just like the rest of world and to do what is best for them individually and not the rest of us. The solution for the both of them is to get rid of some outsourcing not all together, because if that were to happen the Globalizing economy would drop
In America today, we do not necessarily think about the countries around the world but what if one day your boss told you that you were being transferred to a foreign country you knew nothing about? A million thoughts would race through a person’s mind, and the first reaction would be fury, and they would not want to go not knowing what the future may hold for them in this part of the world. In the movie “Outsourced” Todd is just getting over a breakup and has been told by his boss that he is needed in India. While watching the movie, the viewer can automatically see the high and low context within the countries along with the individualism and collectivism that the two countries differ. The viewer will also quickly see many scenes of relationship
As August Comte stated “Society is a complex system whose parts work together to promote solidarity and stability.” August argues that society has a need for every social structure it currently has, which involves the low-income, middle-income, and high-income societies. The poor are there because society has a need for them, therefore if they were to move up there would be no one to do their purpose
He often mentions about the effect of outsourcing jobs form The United States to foreign countries. He analyzes the effects from both sides perspective. While reallocating jobs from America to foreign countries improves that country’s economy and GDP, it consequently also increases the demand for American goods in that nation. In his view this is a positive development which will refine itself continuously and continue to grow to a point when the world economies become lateral that
In “Will Your Job Be Exported?”, Alan S. Blinder argues the quality and security of jobs in the future, service sectors in America will be determined by how offshorable they are. Blinder starts out the story with a quote by Edmund Burke, “You can never plan the future by the past”. Although he stated we are doing exactly that when it comes to getting the American workforce ready for jobs of the future. Blinder states “demand for labor appears to have shifted toward the college-educated and away from high school graduates and dropouts” (p. 8). According to Lou Dobbs, “Well under one percent of US service jobs have been outsourced.” Eventually offshoring for service sectors will exceed offshoring for manufacturing-sectors for 3 reasons. First simply because there is a greater amount of service jobs than manufacturing jobs in the US and other countries that are well off. Second, service sector offshoring continues to accelerate due to technological advances thus increasing the range of services offshore. And lastly, (e.g. Chinese and Indian) workers with the capability to perform service jobs continue to increase rapidly.