The Second Amendment Essay

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” - Second Amendment. Throughout history, this sentence of twenty seven words has caused an intense debate. The polemic is that some people claim that a gun control policy is unconstitutional, while others disagree and even say it is necessary in order to reduce crime. Now, what does gun control mean? If it means to analyze who is responsible enough to own a gun by a “Universal Background Check”; that sounds right to everyone. But in the article “What Are Obama’s Gun Control Proposals? An Easy Guide” published in the National Journal by Matt Vasilogambros. The author states that the “gun-control

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people to assemble peacefully, and to petition the Government for e redress of grievances.

The First Amendment is the first section of the Bill of Rights and is often considered the most important part of the U.S Constitution because it guarantees the citizens of United States the essential personal freedoms of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly and the freedom to petition the Government. Thanks to the rights granted by the First Amendment, Americans are able to live in a country where they can freely express themselves, speak their mind, pray without interference, protest in peace and where their opinions are taken into consideration, which is something not many other nationalities have the fortune of saying. The Founding Fathers were the framers of the Constitution of the U.S., and the responsible for the

We have had several of the worst mass shootings in our nation's history in quick succession over the past few years. Certain legal restrictions and acts from our government could have prevented numerous deaths. Common sense background checks and limitations to cartridge size and assault weapons would surely have saved many lives at the Las Vegas Massacre, but certain men and women claim that these restrictions violate their second amendment right. They claim that guns aren't the problem. That guns don't kill people, people kill people. So limiting access to devastating guns is just avoiding the problem. The Second Amendment right presumably violated by common sense gun control is “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (Second Amendment). The Second Amendment states that for the need of a well regulated militia to protect the security of the free state and the right for the people to keep and bear arms. Militias have been inactive for decades so in a sense the intent of the amendment is no longer relevant. Based on the 2nd Amendment, the Constitution is not still a valuable and viable document in modern America because it stands in the way of thorough background checks, training courses, and its vague wording and absolute intent make it inefficient to maintain peace and order and should be amended “To the People of the United

The First Amendments is a blessing that the United States is fortunate enough to have. First and foremost, First Amendment protects the right to freedom of religion and expression, without any government interference ("First Amendment" n.p.). The freedom of expression includes the right to free speech, press, assembly, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances ("First Amendment" n.p.). Redress of grievances guarantees people the right to ask the government to provide relief for a wrong through courts or other governmental action ("First Amendment" n.p.). People are allowed to practice their own religions and do not have to conform to one religion, all because of the First Amendment. People's rights are protected with no government interference.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is part of our countries Bill of Rights. The first amendment is perhaps the most important part of the U.S. Constitution because the amendment guarantees citizens freedom of religion, speech, writing and publishing, peaceful assembly, and the freedom to raise grievances with the Government. In addition, amendment requires that there be a separation maintained between church and state.

“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” In our political climate today, there is an ongoing debate on the meaning of the second amendment. In particular, much controversy centers upon whether we should make gun control laws more strict like the laws in DC, or if we should make laws to encourage and embrace American citizens to own firearms and carry them in public, similar to laws in Vermont. In fact, some citizens wonder why we even have the second amendment in the first place.

The 1st Amendment forbids Congress from enacting laws that would regulate speech or press before publication or punish after publication. At various times many states passed laws in contradiction to the freedoms guaranteed in the 1st Amendment. However broadcast has always been considered a special exemption to free speech laws for two reasons. 1) the most important reasons is the scarcity of spectrum and the 2) is the persuasiveness of the medium. Because radio and TV come into the house, and may be heard or seen by unsupervised children, the government feels a special responsibility to protect the American people. As Herbert Hoover said to, "doublegaurd them."

The Second Amendment is one of the most controversial amendments in today’s society. There are commonly two sides that fight with each other over the definition of this amendment. The pro-gun, or what is commonly referred to as “gun nuts”, have the firm belief that the American people have the right to not only carry a gun, but to carry any type of gun that they want, while anti-gun groups want to get rid of the right to carry a gun all together unless that person is a soldier or police officer.

The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America is one of the most controversial. The Second Amendment says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." There have been many arguments over the amendment's meaning and interpretation. There are those who interpret the amendment to mean it provides for people as a whole monitored by the military, while the other view is that it provides individual rights to the people. The controversy brought on by the Second Amendment is it does not clearly define whom "the people" are. Ambiguity has left room for action by legislators and the courts to pass laws and make interpretations

This amendment is saying that the press (in general courts have defined the press so as to include all publishers) can write the truth in the newspaper even if it makes the government look bad. The first amendment, which is included in the bill of rights (the first 10 amendments) was ratified on September 25, 1789 and adopted on December 15, 1791. Anti-federalists demanded that they got the bill of rights so that they could ensure that the government didn’t have too much power over them. The bill of rights was written mostly by James Madison. The press were being pressured to write only and exactly what the president or other person wanted them to write. “If law is unjust a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so” -Thomas Jefferson. The freedom of the press doesn’t directly apply to everyone because not all people are considered part of the press, but it still in a way applies to most people and is very important. In 1735 John Peter Zenger, a publisher for the New York Weekly Journal, got sent to court for criticizing New York's governor. His paper claimed the governor accepted bribes, removed a judge and tried to fix an election. All of this was the truth. At the time it was illegal to criticize the king, governors represented the king. Zenger argued that

Sir Edward Coke stated, “The house of everyone is to him as his Castle and Fortress as well for defense against injury and violence, as for his repose.” (qtd. in "Pre- Founding”) This quote demonstrates the importance of one being secure in one’s home and belongings. No matter what home is, it is the “castle” and is used it to protect one from anything that could be a potential harm. This inalienable right, regarding searches and seizures, is one of the rights fought for during the Revolutionary War.

In our country of United States people are arguing over the issue of to keep guns or to ban guns. Everyone has their own opinions and think differently about things. I believe that we should be allowed to own guns for many reasons. In the constitution of the United States it states that a well regulated militia, being the best security of a free state, the right of people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. In the second amendment, it says that everyone can own a gun, so I think we should be able to own them. People mainly use guns for protection, and recreational use.

The second amendment is a very controversial topic in modern society. The Second Amendment is a right that was given to the American people in 1787, which allows individuals to own guns. It states in the constitution, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This quote states that all Americans have the right to own their own firearm. In the past years the second amendment has been juggled around because of the many mass shootings that have taken place recently. Many people on the right argue applying gun control or getting rid of the second amendment all together is only going to make the problem worse, others on the left argue that removing the second amendment or applying gun control is the answer to the problems. However, is removing it or applying gun control really the answer to the problem of mass shootings.

If taken literally one, can simply state the 2nd amendment in the bill of rights as their answer. There literally is no better way to protect something valuable to you than to get a weapon and fight for it, that’s what America has been doing since its conception. However, in modern society, we can’t just do that, there are rules in place to prevent that, but those are exactly what allow us to establish and preserve the freedom of the American population in its entirety. Although people inevitably complain about the laws established by the government, they rarely take action. Now why is that? It’s simple, the government was established on the principle that the people would collective decide to obey those laws as long as the government would serve to protect their rights. This is based off the social contract of John Locke, the people are willing to give up some of their peripheral rights(more accurately some privileges) to have all their necessary rights protected. This principle is what lead the Framers to establish a “government of the people, by the people, [and] for the people.” In addition, the Bill of Rights, or amendments to the constitution, were added, providing tangible proof of the rights of the people protected by the government. These methods have stood the test of time in not only establishing freedom within our nation, but also preserving them throughout our history even in times of war.