The three components that you must consider when you evaluate the morality of an act is by the objective act, the subjective motive, and the situation of the circumstance. For each of these acts, we also follow the moral laws which are external, universal, and immutable. Moral values go against the moral laws because they focus in on internal and relative meanings. God wants us to follow the moral laws because that is the true action while moral values make you decide between good and bad. The objective act is the easiest of the three acts of morality because it means not to do any evil. Most people do not want to cause evil on other people, yet some people find it enjoyable to do bad things just for the fun of it. When you commit this act you are always certain that you are doing and you know of it. If the person had no intentions except for doing evil, then it is an objective act. An example of the objective act would be to take a lollipop away from a baby and to throw it away afterwards. Because the act of taking one's lollipop away and throwing it away serves for no purpose than you making the baby upset, it is an objective act because you did something wrong just to do harm. The second component that you must consider when you evaluate the morality of an act is by the subjunctive motive. The subjunctive motive, or the motive and intention, is doing an act which involves doing good but you would only do it if you got some kind of a reward at the end of the day. In
Personal values, beliefs, and principles are important for individuals to know about themselves. However, when asked the question, “what are your personal values, beliefs, and principles?” The first response is often a laundry list of characteristics with the assumption that those three words are synonymous. From my experience when posed this question the laundry list became long and in retrospect, I began to wonder what the differences were between each of these terms. As a teacher, employee, mother, and Christian knowing these differences and how to answer the question is an important component of determining how I make decisions when faced with ethical dilemmas. Hence, began the investigation of how the terms relate, their meaning and what my answer is to this question. Since my laundry list was quite long for this essay, I will share and explain the top two elements for each category, how they relate to one another and how the knowledge influences tough decisions.
Looking at the 16 “Pillars of Moral Strength”, I believe that they are not only intertwined, but is also reveal in some way or the other in my everyday life. Nevertheless, the four that are chose would be Honesty, compassion, kindness, and Respect.
“Maturity is achieved when a person postpones immediate pleasures for long-term values,” according to Joshua Liebman. Values can be just about anything that you can imagine. My 3 values are respect, loyalty, and honesty. I believe that my three values are what describe me and will help me when I’m older with the decisions that I make.
The development of personal values occurs over a lifetime of living and experiences. What are personal values? What sources shape and influence those values? What criteria and decision making may be used to reshape our personal values? What impact do personal values have in the workplace and on workplace performance? This paper will address these issues from a personal perspective.
Morality has been a subject of many philosophical discussions that has prompted varied responses from different philosophers. One of the most famous approaches to morality is that of Immanuel Kant in his writing Groundwork of Metaphysics of Morals. Kant in this work argues that the reason for doing a particular action or the drive to do good things is a fundamental basis of defining moral quality in a person. To him, an action could be considered morally right only if the motivation behind doing that action was out of ‘goodwill’. When he defines these moral rules, he characterizes them in the form of imperatives – the hypothetical imperative and categorical imperative. While hypothetical imperatives deal with motivations and actions that
Haidt makes the claim that there are 5 basic moral values that all humankind shares. The 5 values are care over harm, fairness and justice, respect for authority, group loyalty, and lastly purity. What differs between people is the importance of these values. People with similar values come together and form groups and tribes. It is in these groups that mankind is able to accomplish great things. The problems come into play when the groups reach a decision that confronts their morals. According to Haidt this is part of the issue with the political system. There are two tribes the conservatives and the liberals that have conflicts about their morals. These conflicts make it so that they are not able to work together. Haidt states however that
Being ethical as an individual defines who you are and what you stand for as a human being. As a professional nurse, being ethical defines how you treat and behave towards your colleagues and the patients. Nursing`s philosophies and worldviews influences an individual’s personal, cultural and spiritual values they possess as a professional. When these philosophies conflict with personal or cultural or spiritual values, then ethical dilemmas arise. Ethical dilemmas puts a nurse in a limbo as it is very hard to choose between what is right in the best interest of the patient.
Moral principles are the rules that govern which actions are right and which are wrong. A moral can be for all of society or an individual’s beliefs. Sometimes a moral can be gleaned from a story or experience. There are many common moral beliefs in American society. I would like to just name a few such as, be honest, do not cheat, treat others as you would want to be treated, do not judge, tell the truth, be respectful to yourself, have humility, be generous, serve mankind be loyal, keep your self control, respect others, be loyal, have courage, be trustworthy, be forgiving, have integrity, keep your promises, and be of tolerant differences.
Throughout the semester we’ve discussed several key themes of morality and ethics for instance, how morality is perceived objectively, individually, and culturally. Along with the various theories of morality such as kantianism, utilitarianism, and Rawls theory of justice to name a few. Through our study and discussion of these theories it’s required us to question our own morality and consider our own ethical standpoint. The treatment of animals and socio-economic status are topics we’ve very thoroughly discussed in class, many people are discriminated against and even murdered solely because of their gender, ethnicity, sexuality, and/or economic status. In addition numerous animals are unnecessarily and senselessly tortured and killed, it
The values I hold most importantly in my life would be the ability to be resilient, resourceful, approachable, discrete, and reverent. Putting all these values into action are what has helped me to carry on with my life and stand as how I stand today.
After completing the Personal Values Questionnaire, I selected five items that represent my personal values. My personal core values are connectedness, fairness, family, communication, and teamwork. These are the values that affect my decisions making and influence my behavior while working with students and other professionals in higher education. My values are definitely align with my personal beliefs.
Many of the physicians based their decisions by the duty oriented theory. The physicians found it their duty to provide a treatment and care plan that will suite every child. They were meticulous in their research so they know exactly what the end result of a specific treatment will be. Had the physicians changed abruptly on the care plan, the control groups and results would not be accurate and thus not giving proper aid and treatment that eventually could be the ultimate treatment for ALD. It would be improper for the physicians to be inconsistent and irrational in their decision making despite of their own diet research not being accurate enough to treat ALD.
In the beginning of this English course, there were seven objectives that the students enrolled in the course needed to complete in order to earn credit for the class. These objectives include meeting a twenty page requirement, applying modes of expression to our papers, demonstrate developed academic reading and interpretation skills, participate in groups with fellow classmates, expand a personal values for ethical behavior in a classroom setting, enhance the student’s writing abilities, and develop the ability to complete research (Rougeau-Vanderford). I, as a student in this course, was able to meet all of these seven objectives throughout the school year using various papers, workshops, and journals assigned to us for the teacher to
The development of morals is an often studied topic in psychology. However, there is a debate over whether morality is learned, or something humans are born with. A number of experiments have shown that the latter may be a large part of the truth. Infants seem to have basic concepts of empathy, helping others, and punishment before they can speak or participate in society. However, humans continue to develop their morals throughout their lives. These findings simply support the idea that there is an evolved base moral core that is present in all humans from birth.
This paper is about five important moral values. Personally, I believe that every child should have these moral values because these moral values were vital to me when I was growing up. Basically, I would pass these moral values on to my child, because they are so imperative to have. As the children go through elementary school, middle school, and high school, they will need these essential moral values.