The United States

After gaining their independence from Great Britain in 1776, the American colonies were struggling to establish a new stable nation. Many plans such as the Articles of Confederation “ which reflected Americans’ recent experience with England, kept the national government weak and dependence on the states (68), were proposed to unify the country as a whole. However, the Articles of Confederation poses many challenges because it gives too much power to the states. As the results, “the states had a difficult time standing up to foreign powers (69), this led to the introduction of the Constitution. In contrast to the Articles of

The Era of Good Feelings was time of increased nationalism and prosperity for the nation; however, debates over several important issues created a crack the outward appearance of harmony during President Monroe’s two terms. This is a fitting statement for the time period, especially considering issues such as, Mc’Culloch v. Maryland, Land Law of 1820, The Missouri Compromise, and the Gallatin Papers. Each of these supports various side of the argument, be it creating prosperity for the government, difficulties of equality, or both. This time period created both prosperity through power of government and issues between state and federal levels.

No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.

On the floor of the Senate on January19-27, 1830, Senator Daniel Webster of Massachusetts argued that the states should be considered as one nation (Webster, 178). In response, Senator Robert Hayne of South Carolina argued that the states should be able to interpose and or nullify the federal government and its laws when they thought necessary to protect their citizens’ rights. (Hayne, 166). Overall, Senator Webster’s argument was better because he pointed out that although join the federal government may seem risky, it overall goal is to ensure a stronger nation for the people.

In the Federalist number 10, Madison argued and analyzed the importance of the Constitution that can support the establishment of a government capable of controlling the violence and damage caused by factions. The essay proposes that the state administrations have not accomplished in resolving factions, but the situation is so challenging

In his articles in the Federalist Paper, John Jay observed and described the important role of the national government. He had an image of America growing stronger due to the tightly united government, thus he argued in favor of uniting all the states under one union to serve the people. However, as the U.S. has thrived strongly and surpassed the Founders’ expectation, John Jay’s presumptions no longer apply sufficiently. There are flaws in his arguments. It is true that America is better off by having one government, yet it only works if the government is unified. Unfortunately, contemporary American politics do not reflect this idea. It is no longer the case where the government

Cultures using hyphenated forms of “American,” such as Mexican-American, African-American, Asian-American, Native-American and many more is a step in the right direction for culture acceptance. With this positive move in the world, there could be a change in how cultures view themselves, leading to how others view them. The multicultural society has to take into account for this change because without their acceptance it would just be hate. Bharati Mukherjee in her essay “American Dreamer,” asserts, “WE MUST BE ALERT TO THE DANGERS OF AN ‘US’ vs. ‘THEM’ MENTALITY.” Although Mukherjee has a great point here, I have to disagree. I don’t feel that we have to be aware of the ‘US’ versus ‘THEM’ mentality with the change in cultural acceptance.

Throughout the history of this nation, the Constitution, from the formation to the execution thereof, has set forth the precedent for the demonstration of excessive federal power that is clearly illustrated by history and modern America. Sufficient documentation to back up this premise includes primary documents such as James Madison’s Federalist No. 10, the Constitution of the United States, and other historical pieces. Ample consideration should be given to the paramount decisions of America’s elected officials in critical moments as well in the very construction of the American system of government that favors federalism.

The Tenth Amendment granted all power to the states, unless specifically delegated to the federal government by the constitution. In addition, the Supremacy Clause may be found in Article Six, Clause Two of the constitution, and states that the federal government will be the “supreme law of the land”. This means that if the state and the national governing bodies came into conflict, the federal government would ultimately rule over the state. These two additions to our Constitution exist to limit the tension between the State and United States government, all while ensuring that powers are shared in a fair nature.

.“Ships that come and go- I wonder where they’ve been and where they’re going when they leave. I wonder what they carry with them and what they bring. The other day when I went to the market, I saw stalks of sugarcane- one of the vendors said that it came from Barbados. Barbados is an island like Jamaica- maybe Thomas will take me there one day…”

In document 1, the picture shows different countries represented by little people. In this picture they are all in a school yard, which represents the U.S. , and they are all out of control. You see the filipinos represented by the monkey looking child, you can also see china and other countries. What this picture wants to show is that the countries are acting like little children in the way that they cannot govern themselves while the U.S. is the woman taking care of them. The United States believed that these countries need help in government so they wanted to step in and “help”.

The Southern States of America was made up of the following, Georgia with Atlanta as the Capital of the new union, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Mississippi, South Carolina, Louisiana, Tennessee and Kentucky. Although, Kentucky wasn’t a sure bet at this point, there was still a lot of work to do in that state.

Confederacies exist as a group of autonomous individual states, regions, or member components who form a national body, or centralized government, to represent their independent interests at a more regional and international level. The existence of the national government is derived from the consent of each governed autonomous state or region. The entities that submit to this central ruling authority are able to withdraw from the compact that binds them together. The national authority created is only bestowed with the powers, authority, and privileges which the independent components in the confederacy allow. If any member component feels its interests are no longer being served or the compact has interfered with its autonomy, then that entity of the confederacy can sever its ties with the national body. This can occur because the state, region, or member component has the supreme ultimate authority over its own affairs. As further examination and analysis will demonstrate there is no inherent authority invested into the national government as is the case of a federalist system.

The basic explanation of what this compromise was, is basically a package of 5 different bills that the United states Congress passed in 1850. That is not all though, for it is rather more complicated than just being 5 different bills. to further understand the compromise, you need to think back to the slave and free states of our country at this time.

One of the main foundations upon of the Constitution is the innate belief that we are a government run are by the people, yet must simultaneously watch for the corruptions of those same people who stand beside us. It is the reason that the United States has a system of checks and balances, to prevent one branch from becoming too powerful, it is why we have the electoral college, though many argue it’s exclusivity has hardly served its purpose, and it is why we have the 7th Amendment, which guarantees all civil trials (that exceed $20, ironically) to be accompanied by a jury. Though the question of its justification and use is more complex than a complete agreement or disagreement, the amendment overall deserves its place among the others, and then some. It is not insusceptible to corruption, most will admit, but we need this right both for it’s efficiency and for it’s correlation with the very foundational principles that make up our country.