GOD Theories: Work, Teams and Groups Norms of Behaviour: As the CEO of that big a company, Rahul Yadav was fully aware of the rules and regulations of the company. He knew what was to be done and what not. But he chose not to follow them. The norms can be effective in influencing behaviour only if the individual group members understand it and are willing to accept it. And even if he worked on individual projects, he would not adhere to the norms. The organizational culture of honesty, integrity and code of ethics did not stop him from exhibiting irrational behaviour. Group Cohesion: The teams and groups that Rahul Yadav was a part of were very low on group cohesion. There were idealogical differences among the members and many a times the …show more content…
But he doesn't have the interests of his own company in mind, as he has now said that it is not interesting for him to solve the housing problem”. Personality, attitude and values: He was very artistic an innovative. It did not please him when he didn’t have the freedom to carry out things his way. His friends stated that, “He was very instinctive and his arrogance would cross limits sometimes. He would talk less but at the same time he could very influential politically. Also he would be so engrossed in his own world that he would not bother about what others thought or did.” And Yadav was openly contemptuous of rival organisations and people he perceives to have crossed his path. Rahul was one leader who has his own ways of expressing his anger, delight or even high-headedness. And when he expresses, he comes across as a spoilt, aggressive brat, who does his thinking and talking aloud. His aggressiveness makes him a controversy magnet. An instance which supports this would be when he decided to play a little game by lying and manipulating the media. On being questioned about the possible acquisition with Quikr by journalists and the media, he said “yes” to some and “no” to the
He was one of the most famous artists and many writers went to him to create compelling works
of the people in his city and he becomes loved. He did a great deed for his people, and he felt very gratifying about it. Although this played a role in his personality
He was very active in politics but didn’t really care about national affairs. In the war of
He does not want to uncover his dishonesty, because
He didn't care about what others thought about him, he knew what he wanted and
Ethical leadership is vital for the success of any business; this case study illustrates that the lack of moral values and a healthy ethically incline corporate culture, can lead to scrupulous behavior from the CEO all the way down the company. Scrushy had a demanding and cunning personality, and it was easy for his to influence others in his business to go along with the fraud. Also, having Stanwick and Stanwick, (2013) an active board of directors does have a positive impact on the performance of the firm. Also, good corporate governance supports the ethical requirements established by the stakeholders. A moral leader must cultivate a real ethically driven organization, which has no tolerance for unethical behavior.
His early paintings had an unconventional, unique, and unfinished look about them. The images were known to everyone in everyday life.
Throughout his public life, he embodied for many people an ideal of persistence, tolerance and personal strength. In my opinion, it is the combination of these qualities that made him an outstanding person and a globally recognized leader. Neither persistence without strength, nor strength without tolerance would suffice to turn around the life of
According to Johnson (2012) leaders are powerful role models, and policies will have a little effect if leaders do not follow the rules they set. In Enron case, corruption and ethical misconduct were deeply embedded in their business culture where profitability was more important than ethics. In this paper, I will address the factors that had led to the development of the culture of profit before principle at Enron. Also, I will create my personal code of ethics that will guide me in my professional and personal decision making and doing the right thing when faced with ethical challenges.
His hands were seamed with a thousand wrinkles like the map of a state with a lot of rivers and roads. He had excellent native wit and priceless ability to think around the edges of problems. He would do scary things without thinking much about them. He was quick to make decisions and quicker still to express his disapproval at having his time wasted. It behooved you to speak clearly and succinctly
One of his fundamental messages heard in many lectures is that human beings can and must learn to be creative in many different ways. He had a very famous slogan “everyone is an artist” this does not mean that every person is an artist. But that every person has the potential to create art. He also imagined that all creativity and art would result in “social sculpture”. Some of his other slogans that he used in his art work are “Art= Capital” and “creativity = Capital” these were his way of telling people about his new ideas. And how it transformed society as he envisioned it to be.
week since the age of six, all the pretense is gone, so you tend to say what you mean. That made him different from others because he didn't use metaphors a lot. Another aspect
He entered life as one who would live in the privileged class all of his life, but he never seemed to consider himself privileged or above the people. His father was a member of the House of Lords, so he was indoctrinated into politics at an early age. But, he seemed to have an innate knack to understand the inner workings of the political and diplomatic system also. Because of this understanding he would prepare himself for the
This made others trust in him and establish a leader role. His speeches was so skilled and
And if he hadn’t lived like this he wouldn’t have had his phonograph, radio, car, and frigidaire. However, it was also this conduct that turned him into a follower, unable to make decisions for himself. This is shown in lines 23 and 24 when the speaker says, “he held the proper opinions for the time of year; When there was peace, he was for peace; when there was war, he went. He even had five children, which was the right number for a parent in his generation”. He did everything by the book just like everyone else of this time.