Essay on Thomas Aquinas’ Theory of Christianity Theology is Science

- St. Thomas Aquina interpreted Aristotelian philosophy from a Christian perspective. Aquina also gave five proofs for God’s existence; motion, efficient cause, possibility and necessity, degrees of perfection and design. The first way was natural things are in motion. If something is in motion, then it must be set into motion by something outside of itself. There

Saint Thomas Aquinas was a Philosopher used the logic of both Aristotle and Saint Augustine to establish his teachings. He taught that believing in God was not simply for the ignorant. He used both Greek Philosophy and Christian Doctrine in his teachings. He taught an abundant of things including that the goal of Theology is is use reason to grasp the truth about God and to experience salvation through that truth. In addition to that, he shaped the catholic understanding of mortal sin and venial sin.

Showing the change in Christianity is Aquinas’ argument in the 13th century C.E. He argues against being

In Aquinas’ view, knowledge of God could be reached in two ways; one through revelation for example, through the words of the Bible and the other is through our own human reason. Aquinas thought that if we applied reason to the evidence that

One of Thomas Aquinas's greatest accomplishments was his book called The Summa, this helped create his place in history because it was one of the first books by a philosopher proving God's existence. Summa was written for the common people by Thomas Aquinas to help the readers understand that the religion is reasonable. The book also takes Thomas Aquinas' researches of philosophy and bring them into his religious beliefs. The book was written sometime around 1265-1272. In The Summa, Thomas Aquinas basically talked about how there is no reason why not to believe in god. He made statements that showed there IS evidence into believing in god but no evidence not to believe in god. The summa is divided into 3 chapters in which Thomas Aquinas gave different sets of evidence. The first summa is the fact that Thomas Aquinas believed in God's existence. In the Summa, Thomas Aquinas says, "God wills good to every being which exists and loves them. Together making love the common denominator of God to the world." Statements like this in the first summa were referring to the fact that god helps everyone and it brings out the best love in them. The second summa was all about ethics and how people should act. Aquinas based a lot of his information of of the information of a man he studied for years, Aristotle. Aristotle was just before Thomas Aquinas' time and Thomas Aquinas didn't only learn information from him, he learned how to

Conflicts between faith and science go back for thousands of years, most conflicts between faith and science are found in the Bible. There are many stories in the Bible which faithful people believe in fully, but people who have a more firm belief in science see the Bible as stories which can be explained through science. A few stories from the Bible which scientists believe could be explained in ways other than just by miracles, are the creation of Earth and humans, Joshua stopping the sun, Cain being unable to grow crops, and Elisha fixing a poisoned river. Religious people believe in these and consider them miracles. However, believers in science doubt their authenticity and find ways to disprove the miracles.

In this paper, I will discuss how three influential scholars in this order: Augustine, Aquinas, Galileo, delimit science or the bible and the ways their beliefs overlapped or didn’t.

After reading Article 1, Aquinas for Armchair Theologians by Timothy M. Renick most can automatically acquire that Thomas Aquinas was a very influential thinker amongst others when explaining his theological views. His religious views may have differed from others during his time, however, it did influence and encourage others on the different topics of God vs. Satan, and why God has not all the answers, and powers when making sure every human being should not face evil. Aquinas believed that Christians needed to view their basic beliefs in another way to make sense of their own faith when questioning all that God did for each individual. The real question to all this, which a lot of people even question today is “Why is their evil in the World?”

Thomas Aquinas’s cosmological argument is a posteriori argument that Aquinas uses to prove the existence of God. Aquinas argues that, “Nothing can move itself, so whatever is in motion must be put in motion by another, and that by another again. But this causal loop cannot go on to infinity, so if every object in motion had a mover, there must be a first mover which is the unmoved mover, called God.” (Aquinas, Question 2, Article 3). I do agree with Aquinas’s cosmological argument in proving the existence of God with several reasons.

Thomas Aquinas's Summa Theologica represents one of the most famous attempts to prove God's existence. Aquinas wrote at a time in which people began to develop skepticism concerning the existence of God. In this regard, it is instructive to position Aquinas

. . the science of Christian faith and life.” Saint Augustine in the fifth-century defined theology as “Rational discussion respecting the deity.” A. H. Strong, the great twentieth century theologian said that theology is “the Science of God and of the relations between God and the universe.” Simply put, Theology is the study of God, and I believe there is a one true God, Jesus Christ. I also believe that theology can be used as a tool to try and understand God, gaining wisdom and in the pursuit of a better

Theology, on the other hand, obtains knowledge and truths based on both reason and on revealed truth and faith. As a result, Aquinas saw philosophy as a subset of theology because theology deals with both reason and revelation to obtain knowledge, while theology only uses reason. In a similar light, Aquinas also believed that all theologians are philosophers, but he did not see all philosophers as theologians. Consequently, Aquinas saw theology as superior to philosophy because of theology’s unlimited potential and means of acquiring truths/knowledge; in other words, theology encompasses subjects that reason, or philosophical studies, cannot

I believe that the argument from mystical experience is very convincing. As already noted in Aquinas’ mystical experience, it became evident to him that God is far more than one can imagine. To examines his experience further, his decision to stop the project and being silenced instead with respect to God as a supreme being is a testimony that God is beyond what anyone can put into words. Another observation is that he felts that it was very important as he knows the truth is his heart after having such a glorious experience. Besides, one argument by some Christian is that one cannot imagine God simply because he is unimaginable and that our human mind doesn’t have the ability to comprehend him. If that is the case, it explains why Aquinas

“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” This quote by famous scientist Albert Einstein shows how there are those who believe that the coexistence of Science and Religion is possible despite the overwhelming majority of the population that that believes the quite opposite to be true. However, there is a scientist that takes this clash and puts it into a better way of understanding. Francis S. Collins’, who wrote the New York Times bestseller, “The Language of God”, explains in this text many arguments and counterarguments that bridges the gap between science and faith, whist arguing that they can coexist, contrary to many misconceptions. In the novel, he explains his own personal journey from atheism to a steadfast belief in God and His word then proceeds to address scientific ideologies such as, Intelligent Design and Theistic Evolution and their connection to faith.

Before diving into sacred doctrina, Aquinas explains sacred doctrina as the science of God and how His creation related back to him. In order to study sacred doctrina, one can either look at the causes first and make sense of what follows or he can look to the effects in order to draw conclusions about the cause. The latter is the method of St. Thomas Aquinas in explaining sacred doctrine in his Summa Theologiae. Aquinas looks to creation in order to make conclusions about the Creator. In order to discus what God is, Aquinas looks to creation to examine what God is not. God’s infinity is one of the many arguments of Aquinas that show his method of argument.