Three Key Types Of Organizational Commitment

Continuance commitment is when a person really has to work for the company. They may be drowning in financial debt. For many reasons, a person may want to leave the organization for a better or different job opportunity. They stay within the organization because they are more established and cannot afford to take a loss on another job if salary and benefits do not meet expectation. Out of the three commitments I am in between normative and continuance commitment. Normative commitment at Belk would be not leaving the company because of the high turnover and the position that I recently moved to this past summer as a Karen Kane specialist. I know that I am a valuable employee to them and if I leave them without many associates to work the sales

As per this model, affective commitment refers to the employee’s emotional attachment to the organization. Employers with strong affective commitment remain with the organization because they want to do so. Continuance commitment refers to the extent to which the employee perceives that leaving the organization would be costly. Employees with strong continuance commitment remain because they have to do so. Finally, normative commitment refers to the employee’s feelings of obligation to the organization and the belief that staying is the „right thing‟ to do. Employees with strong normative commitment remain because they feel that they ought to do so (Meyer and Allen 1991). Later, a revision of the three scales was undertaken (Meyer, Allen and Smith

Retaining employees is one way the turnover rate can decrease, Branham (2000), focuses on retaining valuable employees by incorporating four key elements. The first key elements is, “be a company that people want to work for”. There are many companies that have been labeled as, “employers of choice”. These employers all have something in common, which is how they value their employers (Branham, 2000). They treat their employees with respect and like family. With being an “employer of choice,” people are the most valuable asset; not just customers but employees too. Many companies go above and beyond for their customers, but not for their employees, yet they wonder why they are losing valuable talent.

The retention of employees basically refers to different procedures and practices that help retain employee for a much longer period of time. The following issues should be taken under consideration if they want their employees retained for a longer time period: management, communication, salaries, decision making, perks, career development, recruitment, understanding and appreciation (Belanger and Caron, 2005).

In particular cases, the high rate of staff turnover and absenteeism are associated with low level of organisational commitment (Morrow, 1993). The employee who works on this level must be dissatisfied with the organisation; such an employee may stay because he or she needs to stay for the monetary benefits linked to the continuance dimension (Meyer & Allen, 1997). In simple words, it can be inferred that lower level of commitment is interconnected to continuance commitment among the three dimensions of commitment.

There are three separate dimensions to organizational commitment: 1. Affective commitment is an emotional attachment to the organization and a belief in its values. For example, a Petco employee may be affectively committed to the company because of its involvement with animals. 2. Continuance commitment is the perceived economic value of remaining with an organization. An employee may be committed to an employer because she is paid well and feels it would hurt her family to quit. 3. Normative commitment is an obligation to remain with the organization for moral or ethical reasons. An employee spearheading a new initiative may remain with an employer because he feels he would “leave the employer in the lurch” if he left." (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p 77)

Jared, I appreciate the information that you provided in your thread, especially in not having any direct association with the United States Air Force. I believe that Organizational Commitment (OC) is important to the success of any institute. In essence, OC is an employee’s connectedness to an organization (Huang, You, & Tsai, 2012, p. 515). When an employee possesses a sense of connectedness to an organization, they are more likely to act in the best interest of the entity. According to Kinicki & Fugate, those who display organizational commitment are likely to continue their employment with the organization and possess greater initiative in achieving organizational goals (2016, p. 50). On the contrary, when an employee is not connected to the organization, job dissatisfaction occurs. Job satisfaction “refers to an individual’s emotional orientation towards his or her work. It indicates the psychological or physical satisfaction of an employee with the work environment or

Organizational commitment is one of the two individual outcomes derived from individual mechanisms like job satisfaction, stress, motivation, trust, justice, ethics, and learning and decision making. These mechanisms and outcomes can be found on the integrative model of organizational behavior (OB). Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson defined organizational commitment in their Organizational Behavior 5th Edition book as the desire of an employee to remain a member of the organization (p 64).

Different leadership organisations have different leadership styles that they have adopted in their operations. However it is up to an organization to make sure that the leadership style it uses contributes to the commitment of different stakeholders in an organization. Organizational commitment is one of the salient on going organizational issues faced by managers. Past literature has highlighted the importance of retaining committed employees as an aspect of survival for organization hence many forward thinking are striving to create a positive organizational climate in order to keep those good employees through various human resource initiative (Chew, J, &

In the view of Moen & Spencer (2006), wellbeing is important as it plays an essential role in creating prosperous societies. Focusing on wellbeing in the workplace can facilitate societies by aiding individuals working in offices to feel satisfied, committed and happy. The evidence reveals that people who are successful in achieving wellbeing in the workplace to a good standard are more productive, loyal and creative. They also tend to make efforts to make the customers more satisfied and retain them. In this consideration, Scott, Crompton & Lyonette (2010) stated that the organizations that realise the importance of employee satisfaction make efforts to formulate engagement strategies promoting employee wellbeing. However, engaging employees is only one aspect of wellbeing. Improving wellbeing requires a more comprehensive and rounded approach that focuses on the provision of all the factors essential to an employee. Moen & Spencer (2006) provided the idea that some of the factors that can improve employee wellbeing include: strengthening employees’ personal resources , encouraging employees’ pride in their roles within the system of organization, enabling employees to function to the best of their abilities in collaboration with others and individually, and making the overall experience of employees positive. In this context, Scott (2009) asserted that the most important factor that enhances the employee wellbeing in the workplace is a sense of

The commitment indicator is the extent to which employees engage in the corporate culture of the company. With the intention to quit, the response to which an employee’s overall indicators are not being met and in turn is a company’s employee turnover. By fulfilling the drive to bond has the greatest effect on employee commitment, whereas meeting the drive to learn is linked to employee engagement. When all four-drives are satisfied, a company can improve its overall motivation of their employees.

Many may argue that job satisfaction and organizational commitment are the same, but they are actually different.

Organizational commitment is critical to organizations due to the desire to retain a strong workforce. Organizations want to know why employees stay or leave their organizations so if correction is needed they have some tools to proceed with the correction. High turnover of employees in an organization can determine if an organization is successful or not. While turnover is related to all three areas of commitment researchers have determined that Affective commitment is one most associated with absenteeism and organizational citizenship (Williams J. 2004).

Personal characteristics of workers also has an impact on job satisfaction. Job satisfaction increases age. Whites have greater job satisfaction than non-whites. The level of education is slightly negatively related to job satisfaction. If personal skills and abilities are not required by a job, job satisfaction decreases. When a person is more adjusted personally, they will be more satisfied with work. Most of all having a job with decent and fair wage may be the most important variable to job satisfaction. High job satisfaction is associated with low turnover and low absenteeism and with high commitment. Although the evidence is not conclusive, high job satisfaction is associated with high performance and prosocial behaviors.

Job satisfaction is the very important factor in general quality of life because it is closely connected with working life (e.g. Argyle, 1989; Bang & Lee, 2006), with family life, everyday life, and mental health (Orpen, 1978; Schmitt and Bedeian, 1982; Faragher, Cass & Cooper, 2005). Level of job satisfaction is also highly related to turnover, absenteeism rate, work productivity or accomplishment (Muchinsky, 1977; Organ, 1977). Many researchers (e.g. Cherrington, 1994; Acorn, Ratner & Crawford, 1997; Ostroff, 1992; Spector, 1997) state that employees who experience high job satisfaction contribute to organisational commitment, job involvement, their physical, mental health and overall well-being are improved. Job dissatisfaction on the