One process of governing is policymaking that involves three stages, e.g., development, implementation, and evaluation (Porche, 2012). In addition, precise mechanisms are put into place to ensure that the intent of the policy is adhered to. One such mechanism is police power that is delegated to the states that are empowered with the authority to enforce the law (Porche, 2012). It is police power that will overrule the individual interest for the promotion of the good of the
responsibility to solve problems often exceed the capacity of state and local authorities to respond effectively. On the other hand, policies developed at the national level may not sufficiently reflect the great diversity of interests across the U.S. to be effective at the local level. Moreover, the
The national and state governments derive their respective powers from the Constitution in several ways. Some powers are explicitly stated while others are not. Understanding the various types of powers can be difficult and this essay is an attempt to clarify them.
A public policy is the body of principles that underpin the operation of legal systems in each state. In this paper I am going to talk about federal along with state policies. I will discuss each of the policies and how they are similar and how they are different. Federal and State policies are made to help keep our Country running smoothly. If there were no policies then keeping our Country safe would be a hard task. Policies are principles that are set to help make our Country operate on a daily bases. I like to think of it as rules that are set to keep our Country safe; because if there were no rules then everyone would be doing their own thing which could cause for a very disorganized situation.
When problems arise in our nation, we are left with a complicated crisis as to whose job it is to do what and who exactly should be taking care of any bad situation that seems to pop up with daily life anywhere in the world, but in this case, America. Certain governmental systems, such as Federalism, can be considered a solution to these crises. Federalism can be defined as the relationship between the individual state governments of America and the national or federal government of the United States; and works to balance the power of a large central government, and the power of the smaller regional governments.
This article provides the audience with an adequately clear and convincing stance to explain what public policy is, and other academic literacy related to public policy, which included some famous theories. The main theme of this article is that public policy is intricate and no scholar can analyze any policies with one particular theory or model. In addition, the author argues that the public policy is multidimensional and it influences every citizen’s life profoundly.
There are a variety of differences and similarities between federal, state, and local governments. This includes, but is not limited to, the responsibilities, size, and staff of the administration. The machinery of government is intended to better the quality of citizen’s lives. Ultimately, federal, state, and local governments were established to work together in bettering programs and laws (Berkley & Rouse, 2009, p.32).
This paper is a review of chapter’s one (1), two (2) and three (3) in Thomas A. Birklands (2016) fourth edition regarding policy process. The reading attempts to define and show what is meant by policy process, how government, politics and the public are intertwined, problems that are associated with the policy process and how we address the problems. Current day events as well as past history are applied to the practice of policy process which assists in defining the process and highlighting its connection and importance. Thomas A. Birklands refers to the Clinton administration, the Obama administration and the George W. Bush administration, the DARE Program, World War II, and the Vietnam War, in the chapters and leads us down a path discussing
Short Essay – Policy-making in the Federal System. The U.S. government’s expansive role in public policy is caught in a swirl of conflicting cross-currents. On the one hand, popular expectations about government’s responsibility to solve problems often exceed the capacity of state and local authorities to respond effectively. On the other hand, policies developed at the national level may not sufficiently reflect the great diversity of interests across the U.S. to be effective at the local level. Moreover, the search for effective policy is further complicated by theoretical debates about the constitutional framework of federalism, e.g., what limits on national power can be derived from the 10th Amendment?
States exercise police power in which gives them the authority to adopt clean air and water standards, regulate safety in the workplaces, as well as to enforce laws that both promote and protect the health, welfare and safety of the people. A state’s police power also includes eminent domain, which means that the authorities can take over private property for public use just upon compensation. States provide their citizens with many public services including schools, healthcare, law enforcement, welfare services, public transportation, agriculture support, and conservation. These services cost the states a great amount of money every year, the largest portion of the budget for both the state and local governments are the more costly services including education, healthcare, transportation, and public safety. In order for states to finance and provide these services to the public they must levy taxes and barrow money.
As a first generation immigrant from England and a mother of two, I am appalled by the news dissipating through my community in regards to a federalist government. A federalist government that is supposedly meant to be for the people, by the people, yet have we not learned from past experiences? Have we become so retrospectively blind that through pompous euphemisms, a few men have garnered enough power to convince us that central power and tyranny are the best methods of governing a large population of people?
I believe that the author started the book by explaining that most people were not ready to call themselves Americans in order to show the audience how people living in former British colonies considered their home colonies as its own country or nation and did not want to be connected to the others in any way. I could use this point as a way to activate background knowledge when first reading this book with my students to understand their meaning of the U.S. Constitution.
The actions taken by the framers of the Constitution demonstrated a sense of vision and innovation ahead of its time. One of the most influential aspects of this visionary quality which was coupled with definitive innovation was that framers of the constitution created it so that it would truly endure; they wanted the constitution to be relevant to address the challenges and needs of their time and to be able to benefit citizens of the nations in times to come. The awareness that life in America would change and that needs and priorities would change is truly one of the most visionary aspects of this document, because it has assured us that the document can remain for posterity as essentially a living document.
INTRODUCTION: According to Politics in States and Communities (Dye and MacManus, 2009), government in the constitutional form is primarily about conflict resolution. It exists to find solutions or at least to set parameters for implementing solutions within strict limitations. At the state and local levels (which operate together under state authority), governments have the freedom to address issues and conflicts very directly through the governance policies and restrictions they put in place. For the federal government, however, decisions are tied more directly to what the US Constitution says or what it has been interpreted to mean, and it is very difficult to change.
Governmental policies and politics play a critical role in the realization of change in a public agency since the policies are developed and implemented at various levels (Dukeshire & Thurlow, 2002). Since these policies may range from formal regulations and legislation to informal guidelines in an agency, understanding them is important in the achievement of change in a public agency. A Public agency basically functions based on the established policies and politics in the government. Therefore, the accomplishment of the change in a public agency requires an increased understanding of the politics and policies of government.
In spite of the policy cycle tool, it is not as easy to develop or implement new policy as there are many factors influencing it. The process of policy development involves many participants and individual stake holders. It also involves various areas which will be affected due to the new policy development and implementation. According to Hardee, Feranil, Boezwinkle and Clark (2004) policy circle involves six different stages and involves various parties who are working together for the new policy development. However, it is