preview

Timeline of Events and Causes of the Challenger Space Shuttle Accident

Decent Essays

Timeline of events and causes of the Challenger Space shuttle accident

In 28 January 1986, the Space Shuttle Challenger was launched for the Last time and exploded less than 2 minutes after the lift-off resulting in the deaths of all seven crew members on board (Space shuttle challenger: Wikipedia, 2006).

The failure of the solid rocket booster o-rings was attributed to several factors, including faulty design of the solid rocket boosters, insufficient low temperature testing of the O-ring material and lack of communication between different levels of NASA management.

A timeline of the events leading up to the explosion of the Challenger Space shuttle:

(Times in EST)

January 22 [3:43 p.m.] Lift-off was initially scheduled …show more content…

Once functional, the shuttle became exposed to operational demands from a multitude of users as NASA endeavoured to live up to its promises. Coordinating the needs of political, commercial, military, international and scientific communities placed immense pressures on the shuttle management team (nasa: government, 2006). • Political pressure to provide a reliable reusable space vehicle with rapid turn-around time and deployment seriously hindered the ability for effective systems integration and development. • It was not feasible to construct any complete management support systems that could integrate all of the factors associated with such a diverse group in the operational environment.
The push of the Reagan administration to declare the shuttle ‘operational’ before the ‘developmental’ stage was completed created uncertainty and low NASA employee morale

The process of ‘selling’ the concept of a re-usable space transportation system to the American public and its political system started in the late 1960’s, following the successful Apollo mission. The space shuttle was approved as a method for operating in space without a firm definition of what it goals would be (unlike previous NASA programmes). Support for the project, both politically and economically, was not very strong (nasa: government, 2006).
These factors created an environment in NASA preceding the

Get Access