centercenterTO
From
Date review of issues facing YJ
8820090900TO
From
Date
review of issues facing YJ
ANALYSIS
The potential 12 fields could be considered as question marks.
If these 12 turn out to be unsuccessful then it will be a dog & a decision has to be taken whether to kill or not.
Current 3 fields are cash cows.
Potential fields with good reserves can be stars.
This is a highly capital intensive industry & it is normal to have a high debt to equity ratio.
At the time the loan was taken in 2008, it was the time of the sub-prime crisis or the credit crunch.
At this time no one was willing to lend.
11% of interest rate is high & this may be due to the risk of lending was high at that moment.
YJ could consider in taking
…show more content…
However COS is likely to include several amortized costs.
In this case payables are also not necessarily associated with COS.
Payables maybe linked to new investment activities (surveying, licencing, test drilling etc…)
Although the gearing is high the company may be able to borrow depending on availability of proven licenced oil reserves.
Future cash flows maybe collaterized for new borrowings.(securitization)
Due to the residual dividend policy all the profits have been re-invested.
With the new CEO’S strategy it is unlikely there will be any dividends in the foreseeable future also.
Upto now YJ has completely used up its tax losses.
Going forward full tax at 24% has to be paid.
Potential issues YJ may have with outsourcers is
Control – HSE issues with regard to their companies.
Timing – Availability of suppliers at the time YJ requires.
Delays
Major accidents.
Bad employment conditions.
Negotiation issues – pricing.
Potential issues with new CEO’S strategy for faster growth.
Lack of funds
Staff – only 200
Finding outsourcers
Licencing
Work pressure, stress & dissatisfied employees.
Bribes
Conflict with shareholders-companies risk profile will change.(even CFO might object)
Challenges to sustainability – Because operations going at a faster rate. (HSE issues).
With the availability of alternatives such as shale gas, gas prices could come down.
In such a case revenue for YJ could drop.
Jason speaking to Oliver regarding bribes. Why former ceo??
Maybe
Debt to Equity Ratio of 1.23 more than 1 reveals that more than half of assets are financed by debt.
The beginning of the crisis is rooted in banks giving out subprime loans to people who would have not otherwise been given these loans. The banks assumed that these loans could be bundled and the numbers proved that they were safe investments, because enough people would pay their loans back.
A few years later the market took a turn for the worse, where interest rates were on the rise, and homes were losing their value quickly. Now borrowers that were in these interest only ARM’s needed to refinance these loans because the rates were going up, to a point where the homeowner was not be able to afford the payment. The Federal Reserve tried to stimulate the economy by lowering interest rates during the recession in early 2001, from over 6% in 2000, to a rate just above 1.25% in 2002. These low rates encouraged many Americans to apply for loans for homes that a few years ago they would have not been able to. To encourage the homeownership boom, the Bush administration urged Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to allot more money for low-income borrowers so they could buy their own homes. This resulted in the subprime mortgage
During 2007 through 2010 there existed what we commonly refer to as the subprime mortgage crisis. Through deduction of readings by those considered esteemed in the realm of finance - such as Ben Bernanke - the crisis arose out of an earlier expansion of mortgage credit. This included extending mortgages to borrowers who previously would have had difficulty getting mortgages; this both contributed to and was facilitated by rapidly rising home prices. Pre-subprime mortgages, those looking to buy homes found it difficult to obtain mortgages if they had below average credit histories, provided small down payments or sought high-payment loans without the collateral, income, and/or credit history to match with their mortgage request. Indeed some high-risk families could obtain small-sized mortgages backed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), otherwise, those facing limited credit options, rented. Because of these processes, home ownership fluctuated around 65 percent, mortgage foreclosure rates were low, and home construction and house prices mainly reflected swings in mortgage interest rates and income.
The most commonly known sub-prime finance crisis came into illumination when a sudden rise in home foreclosures in 2006 twirled seemingly out of control in 2007, triggering a nationwide economic crisis that went worldwide within the year. The greatest responsibility is pointed at the lenders who created such problems. It was the lenders who, at the end of the day, lend finances to citizens with poor credit and a high risk of failure to pay. When the Feds inundated the markets with growing capital
The issue with the housing market began around the year 2000. This was also known as the start of the Real Estate Boom. Banks started to handout subprime loans, also known as junk loans with super high interest rates (Lewis). Normally, lower income families would not be able to receive
In the year of 2007, the Great Recession began. It all started at the bustling Wall Street. It was a pandemic that brought dilemma to the businesses, to the employees and to the elated new home owners. JP Morgan Chase was one of the major banks participated in falsifying the mortgage loans, and they suffered consequences for what they did. The mortgage loans gave temporary joy but longtime misery to home buyers. The federal government filed a lawsuit, and it reached a settlement. The tragedy resulted to Global and Financial reforms.
During the 2008 Great Recession, the financial crisis happened because banks were able to create too much money, way too quickly, and they used it to push up house prices and speculate on financial markets. This was the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression in the 1930s. The bank was giving out money to the people who couldn't pay it back. There were a lot of subprime loans to those people with poor credit history. Subprime mortgages were often sold to families who didn't even qualify for ordinary home loans. They would sell them to the people who couldn't even get loans and then turn around and sell them to the banks. The banks said that "anyone qualifies for loans". These banks often created a lot of fake inflation.
Once things started to get bad, they got really bad for a lot of families who were given mortgages, who were not properly qualified. There was a major spike in defaults, with
The second task that needed to be finished was to forecast the income statement and the balance sheet for the next two years. We grew sales at a 15% rate, which is the stated rate from Koh. Also, in forecasting the balance sheet, we only showed debt financing for the capital expenditure of the DVD manufacturing equipment, which was the requested structure. The forecasted balance sheet shows that there is a problem with current assets covering current liabilities. The way we showed the financing of the capital expenditure was to keep the current weights of short-term borrowings and long-term borrowings consistent with 2001. If Star River continues with their current borrowing structure, they will not be able to cover all of their current obligations.
The main cause of this worldwide economic contraction was the credit crunch in 2007/2008. In the United States, mortgage lenders received incentives to sell mortgages, regardless of the income and credit score of the individual receiving the loan. This lead to an influx of loans being sold that were likely to be defaulted on at a later date. These subprime mortgages proved to be very profitable for the mortgage companies; thus, in order to continue selling these mortgages, they consolidated the debt and sold it to financial intermediaries. Therefore, the loans were no longer being financed through the traditional banking model.
One of the first indications of the late 2000 financial crisis that led to downward spiral known as the “Recession” was the subprime mortgages; known as the “mortgage mess”. A few years earlier the substantial boom of the housing market led to the uprising of mortgage loans. Because interest rates were low, investors took advantage of the low rates to buy homes that they could in return ‘flip’ (reselling) and homeowners bought homes that they typically wouldn’t have been able to afford. High interest rates usually keep people from borrowing money because it limits the amount available to use for an investment. But the creation of the subprime mortgage
The 2008 financial crisis can be traced back to two factor, sub-prime mortgages and debt. Traditionally, it was considered difficult to get a mortgage if you had bad credit or did not have a steady form of income. Lenders did not want to take the risk that you might default on the loan. In the 2000s, investors in the U.S. and abroad looking for a low risk, high return investment started putting their money at the U.S. housing market. The thinking behind this was they could get a better return from the interest rates home owners paid on mortgages, than they could by investing in things like treasury bonds, which were paying extremely low interest. The global investors did not want to buy just individual mortgages. Instead, they bought
If this ratio is high means company owns too many debts which may decrease their
The long-term liquidity risk ratio such as LT debt/Equity, D/E, and Total Liabilities to Total Assets all show a decline from year 2005 due to the repayment of debts. The interest coverage ratio also shows a healthy number of 29.45 in comparison to the industrial average of 15.04 indicating a high ability to pay out its interest expense. Such a low relative risk is not surprising due to the nature of its business depending heavily in R&D development and large intangible assets.