Transitions Of Hospital Readmission Rates

This is an opportunity for hospitals to work more closely with skilled nursing facilities and other post-acute providers to improve care transitions, and experience fewer readmissions. The ACA impacted hospitals by holding back a one percent reimbursement rate. Hospitals will actually need to perform and deliver high-quality evidenced based care to recover the one percent withheld reimbursement rate while hospitals that exceed the benchmark, will received a higher reimbursement rate over the one percent. The Act is intended to help spur the trend of more integrated care throughout the continuum. The Affordable care act (ACA) of 2010 designed programs for improvements and innovation in the quality of hospital care by instituting the Medicare’s hospital readmission reduction program. Through this program, CMS reduces Medicare payment bt one percent for hospitals for hospitals that demonstrated high rate of avoidable readmissions for patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, heart attack

The overall process of discharging a patient from a hospital and the transition back home or to a care facility are critical advancements in the overall course of both acute and long-term care. It is important that the hospitals releasing these patients have ensured the proper overall course of care from beginning to end. The lack of consistency with both the discharge process and the quality of discharge planning has led to many avoidable readmissions. To reduce the amount of hospital readmissions, it is imperative that hospitals recognize the need for focused patient care and that programs are being implemented to assist in the care transition.

Hospital readmissions carry huge costs for hospitals and add greatly to the cost of healthcare. Remote patient monitoring has the potential to prevent many such readmissions.” 2

Readmissions is a basis for financial penalties to hospitals as a provision of the Affordable Care Act by reducing payments to hospitals with an” excess” 30-day readmissions. The data showed that patients living in high poverty neighborhoods were more likely to be readmitted, older and male patients were more likely to be readmitted as opposed to young and female patients. Lastly, patients with CHF, acute myocardial infarction, and those with certain diseases, such as diabetes, liver and kidney disease were at higher risk of being readmitted. The data also showed married patients were less likely to have a readmission because of more social support (Study Links Social, Community Factors with Hospital Readmissions,

Readmission to a hospital creates strain and added expense for the patient and hospital; in 2011, hospital costs due to readmission were almost $41.3 billion (Hines, Barrett, Jiang, & Steiner, 2014; Rau, 2014). There are many aspects of healthcare associated with readmission, such as lack of discharge planning and education, which need to be addressed i to decrease the amount of preventable re-hospitalizations.

This model reimburses hospitals based on quality of care instead of the volume of patients. The quality of care is assessed by patient questionnaires and if hospitals are unsatisfactory penalties may be imposed (Edwoldt, 2012). The value-based system also affects Medicare and Medicaid. It was reported that Medicare readmissions within 30 days of discharge cost 17 billion dollars annually (Edwoldt, 2012). Due to the high costs of readmissions Medicare and Medicaid have implemented a Hospital Readmission Reduction program. A formula is utilized to evaluate readmission rates within 30 days of discharge for any medical reason related to their original admission such as heart failure and pneumonia. Upon review the hospital is potentially penalized. It is important that nurses strive to provide excellence in care despite their beliefs on the ACA. Nurses have the ability to provide a safe patient environment and reduce the risk of hospital associated infections by following hospital protocols such as hand washing.

Hospital readmissions are potentially harmful, costly and often times an avoidable event. Between the provisions set forth under the Affordable Care Act and the penalties authorized by the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services, hospitals are forced to shift their focus towards the development of strategies to reduce and prevent avoidable hospital readmissions related to heart failure. It is estimated that of the 6 million individuals within the United States diagnosed with heart failure, 1 million of them are hospitalized each year with a primary diagnosis of heart failure, accounting for $17 billion dollars of Medicare expenditures (Sales et al, 2013). What is worse is the death rate associated with heart failure each year, accounting

This newer reimbursement system has been a topic of contention amongst a large portion of the professional medical community due to the perceived unfairness that it brings in certain situations where a patient must be readmitted and, as a consequence, the primary care providers may not be reimbursed for the readmission regardless if they were responsible. With the introduction of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, further criteria such as the Readmissions Reduction Program have been added that determines the eligibility of a primary care provider being reimbursed through the Medicare/Medicaid program. These new requirements have led to new avenues of contention amongst healthcare professionals and, in some cases, new avenues for fraud and patient discrimination.

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) added to the Social Security Act has increased the financial accountability of healthcare organizations for preventable readmissions. Hospitals have increased their awareness and are looking for system ways to assist in the reduction. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have initiated a process for decreasing the reimbursement for readmitted patients within a 30-day period. CMS identified readmission measures for applicable conditions of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), pneumonia and in 2015 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hip and knee replacement which are included within the measurement to calculate the readmission payment adjustment for

The Affordable Care Act was enacted to improve health care and to lower health care cost in America. The ACA developed different strategies to meet these goals called the “pay for performance” programs. These strategies are aimed at the different providers to improve quality care. The strategy that I selected is the “Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program” this program/strategy is also known as the HRRP and was begun in October of 2012. HRRP is aimed at hospitals and penalizes hospitals that have a high 30 day readmission rate. The penalties are assessed and based on a number of comparisons, those such as, performance, patient demographics, comorbidities and frailty.

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) was passed in 2012 under the Affordable Care Act, to help hospitals to improve patient care and reduce costs. (Danner, 2016). The diagnoses with the highest readmissions rates associated with the highest expense are: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pneumonia, and congestive heart failure. CMS also extended their program in 2015 to incorporate reimbursement reduction for hip/knee replacements, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and they also have plans in 2017 to include the

This paper deals with the legislative, regulatory components of Medicare Readmission Reduction Program along with recommendation to reduce their readmission rates for a health care facility like Valley hospital in Spokane which has been penalized a higher percentage of 2% as compared to other hospitals in the state of Washington under the third round of penalties.

Under the ACA there is a new method of payment called value-based purchasing (Yuh et al., 2015). Value-based purchasing focuses on aspects of quality care such as: patient safety, efficient care, and customer satisfaction. By providing quality care, physicians and hospitals are offered incentives that deter them from providing avoidable and pricey care (Yuh et al., 2015). Another way that the ACA is enhancing quality care is through the Readmissions Reduction Program. This program will decrease the reimbursements that the hospital will receive if there are a surplus of readmissions within a 30 day period. Overall, this will also improve quality of care by making sure that the patient is really ready for discharge when leaving the hospital and also strengthen efforts to reduce nosocomial infections (Aoughsten et al.,

This memorandum describes Central Health’s Readmission Reduction Program set to commence in May 2017. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has raised concern over the increasing readmission rate and poor quality of care. To address this issue, Congress has created Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) statute under the Affordable Care Act, 2010, which was recently updated under 21st Century Cures Act of 2016. Under the constant pressure of a penalty, Central Health has considered to establish its own Hospital Readmission Reduction Program to address specific imperatives, such as care-coordination, treatment adherence program, and streamlined patient discharge process.

For years, healthcare costs have continued to increase in the United States and policymakers are constantly trying to find ways to reduce spending. According to reports, in 2011, about $900 billion out of the $2.6 trillion annual health care spending was wasteful spending. In the following year, there was a reported $690 billion wasted annually on healthcare. This wasteful spending is attributed to ineffective health care delivery, cost of adverse events, and poor care coordination that has led to avoidable readmissions (Lallemand, 2012). In the United States, readmissions are the highest amongst patients with chronic diseases accounting for about 90% of avoidable readmissions in 30 days after discharge, and costing the industry an estimated $17 billion. These readmissions are a result of inadequate discharge planning, lack of follow-up, and lack of education on disease management (Jayakody et al., 2016). Policymakers on the federal and state level have developed and implemented several programs, some varying state to state, to help reduce wasteful spending while improving quality of care.