Trustee Model Of Representation

The less accountable allows the peers to speak their mind on issues and not be puppets of their party unlike the MPs in the House of Commons who have to be voting with their party or otherwise they will get sacked/kicked out or never be promoted.

When looking how effectively a country represents its citizens, it is important to take into account the manner in which they are represented. The two main types of representation are descriptive and agency representation. Descriptive representation is the concept that those who represent the American people should not only have the same political interest, but should also mirror the demographic makeup of the people. Agency representation, which is what the United States congress looks like, is when the representation does not reflect the demographic, but they speak for their constituents’ interests in congress. The constituents are able to hold the representatives accountable and can choose not to elect them in the next term, so the representatives

By decision making by representatives of the people, rather than direct decision making by the people themselves. These elite representatives would be expected to use their prudence and wisdom to make decisions based on what was in the best interests of the masses. (pg. 7)

On the other hand, the option to be the voters' trustee implies that the Congress Person take decisions on behalf of their constituents without much consulting. However, regardless of the implied autonomy in the trustee option, the member of Congress is still guided by the best interests of their electorate. The trustee model of representation allows the members to vote against the will of the majority of their support base. However, such instances which might

For example, if the people had no say in who was selected as candidates how could they be certain their opinions were given and received by the leaders. If you don’t know who your candidates and what their feelings on your problems and opinions are then you are not having your say in

33. For mundane matters about which their constituents are less likely to be aware or hold a strong position, legislators typically rely on the trustee model of representation.

The article “The Fourth Branch of Government”, Thomas Helgerman discusses how direct democracy plays an important role in state governments. He presents the information in the form of an essay in which he explains his argument and analysis as a student of math and economics as well as a member a parliamentary debate team. The essay will review Helgerman’s analysis and arguments of direct democracy and how it leads to irresponsible legislation that is not subject to inspection of the US political process. In the article, Helgerman explains how direct democracy came to be used in state government and used the state of California as an example.

As advocates of the United States of America, congressmen/women choose between two styles of representation: the trustee model (reflects closer to the Senate), or the delegate model (reflects closer to the House of Representatives). The election of these models will depend on the agents’ list of priorities and placement of interests. The first mentioned model consists on a very trustful body of citizens in which full liberty and faith is set on the elected trustee representatives for them to work on the people’s behalf and take deeply into consideration

In her book, Pitkin views representation in four partial views in order to get a better understanding of the overall term. “Acting for” differs from the other views in that it is focused on the substance of representing. Pitkin also brings up the “Mandate-Independence Controversy” which describes the conflict of how representatives should act. The mandate view of representation is where the representative’s choices reflect the views of the represented; he is bound by the instructions from them. Independence view gives the representative more freedom as long as it’s still what is best for the constituents. Both these views offer ways of viewing how a representative should behave. This principle is demonstrated in a sorority executive council. There are different council positions that demonstrate different strategies used to represent the sorority. There is no clear answer to how much freedom a representative should have when acting for the represented. However, the mandate-independence view and Pitkin’s analogies offers a way of viewing this question. Pitkin’s five analogies for explaining substantive representation will be discussed to further explain this concept: actor, trustee, substitute, ambassador, and specialist. Each analogy has its strengths in defining representation and its shortcomings.

The U.S. Congress is one of our country's most important representative branches. It's purpose mainly consists of confirming and authorizing the national leadership's decisions. In Congress, there are 535 members, all of which have been chosen by the people. The people vote and decide who they want to represent them. One question that is asked abundantly is "Should a member of Congress put the interests of his or her constituents ahead of the nations?" The way a Congressman expresses an answer to this question can classify them as a delegate or a trustee.

In most countries there is a Legislature within the government. The Legislature has power over and supervises the working of the democratic government. Legislators play a critical role in examining and challenging the work of the government and passing legislation. Therefore every legislator should act as a link between the Government and the electorate. This means that the role of a legislator in ensuring the proper workings and function of government is critical in maintaining a democratic and functional society, a legislator should be there to voice the interests of his constituents.

Ensure that the Board can make decisions in an objective manner without undue influence by persons with a private interest.

Individuals may support somebody in light of variables other than unadulterated capacity. Accordingly, the individual chose by general society may not generally be the correct possibility for the position. In a majority rule government, it takes more time to take choices and actualize them. In a government, it's one individual who can take choices and guarantee their speedy usage. In a vote based system, the execution requires larger part voting, hence making this type of government moderately less incite in taking activities. As the administration is liable to change after each race term, the experts may take a shot at here and now objectives. As they need to confront a decision after the consummation of each term, they may lose concentrate on working for the general population and rather concentrate on winning races. Another disservice of majority rule government is that the hordes can impact individuals. Subjects may vote for a gathering affected by the greater part. Constrained or impacted by suppositions of those around, a man may not utilize his own judgment when voting. A considerable measure of use is made on

will of the citizens. Elections allow voice and agency to every single individual in the

1. Independent and Objective Governing Body: people that are educated in research and ethics who can oversee industry trends and issues and