preview

Turkish Armenian Genocide

Decent Essays

In cases such as the Turkish-Armenian conflict, contrary sources are available. Several sources claim that the conflict was in fact a genocide, whilst others maintain that a mass ethnic cleansing was never even thought of by government officials. This issue arises because of a variety of perspectives from which historical accounts are told. However, there is physical evidence from both the Hamidian Massacres (1894-1896) and the Adana Massacre (1909) which clearly indicate that there was a significant and harmful attack on the Armenian people who lived within the borders of the Ottoman Empire. Armenians were subjected to subhuman conditions in concentration camps, not unlike those constructed by the Nazis in Germany, which included malnutrition and disease. Despite the plethora of information regarding the Ottoman Empire’s actions toward the Armenians, it is still denied in an official capacity by the Turkish government to this day.
Unfortunately, the Turkish-Armenian conflict is not the only unacknowledged or marginalized genocide; there are several other incidents of this happening, just in the past century. One of the most prominent being the Rwandan Genocide, which …show more content…

As responsible members of the society, we must legally define the term genocide so that it may be used effectively and efficiently in international courts of law, in order to hold those who do not value human lives accountable for their actions. Genocides must also be acknowledged internationally in order to honor those who died; continuing to disavow these mass murders or ethnic cleansings on an international stage is an insult to those who

Get Access