Two Totalitarian Regimes: Communism and Nazism Essay

Two totalitarian systems, Communism and Nazism were the two most frightening totalitarian political systems in the history of mankind. They were the systems most brutal to its political adversaries but also to its own people and other races and/or religions. Unfortunately our own country, Croatia faced both of them during the 20th century, and some of bad influences we still feel today.In my essay I will do my best to examine these two totalitarian systems, describe their nature in essence and answer

writing about the totalitarian systems and how they changed people’s lives. I am going to look into detail about the totalitarian systems, their facts, their main structures, how they came to power, why they came to power and what changed after they were abolished in two specific countries. A totalitarian system or totalitarianism, as its name states ‘total’, is a form of government where the state keeps public, cultural and other aspects of life under strict control. The totalitarian systems that I

which was unprecedented, they were able to manipulate the public, had strong ideologies and regimes and between them they were responsible for the deaths of millions of innocent people. Although on the surface these two men were

Citizens Programme and the actors involved The common European values influence the narrative and the creation of a certain culture of remembrance. In supranational context, the two memory frameworks dominating official EU discourses for the creation of a common European historical memory are Nazism and Stalinism. These two regimes and their policies embody an absolute contrast to the ideals embraced in the European project: peace, freedom, democracy, the rule of law, human rights, civil liberties and

Fascism and Nazism. Both once prominent forms of government during the 20th century, and now the number of countries that use either one of these governments is diminishing. Fascism and Nazism both emerged because of a general crisis of the European political system during the late 19th century to the end of World War 1. Fascism was motivated by the fears of of social as well as political disintegration, and of political revolution on the part of both ruling of the lower and middle classes (Encylopedia

people to believe that prosperous times await them. This notion would unfortunately turn out as an illusion. Both figures would eventually rule by decree. Despite treading on different paths of dictatorship, both figures still find some commonalities. Two prominent differences would certainly come to mind when distinguishing Stalin from Hitler. The first notable difference lies in the fact that both men had reigned over different territories. Stalin was the dictator of the USSR whereas Hitler was the

candidates, nearly two-third of the party secretaries had completed a course of study at a university, technical college, or trade school, and that four-fifths of the party secretaries had received training in a party school for more than a year. The SEDs Central Committee, which during the 1960s had been an advisory body, was reduced to the function of an acclamation body during the Tenth Party Congress. Although in the end political circumstances led to the collapse of the SED regime, the GDRs growing

responsible Ministry before Parliament. "This means on the one hand, that the State is, by definition, totalitarian, physical and spiritual, of the individual destinations and the activities of the society. On the other hand, in the period between the two world wars, many countries were falling into the hands of totalitarian dictatorships. These regimes received different names: in Russia was communism, in national-socialist Germany and Italy, fascism, and although in each place had its own characteristics

The discrimination of athletes leads me to the Totalitarian regime of Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany who severely discriminated non-Aryan athletes. Hitler’s Nazi philosophy believed that Aryans who were Indo-Europeans with blonde hair, tall bodies, blue eyes, and sharp facial features were a superior race (Anspach, Almog). Hitler said that he “shall have no peace of mind until [he] had planted a seed of Nordic blood wherever the population stand in need of regeneration” (Trevor-Roper, Weinberg 358)

the twentieth century, two opposing dictatorships arose. Although both had many similarities, they represented the culmination of two different political ideologies that had flourished in Europe since the mid-nineteenth century. It all goes back to World War I, which produced an affected public that increasingly seek to change their circumstances in life, but attempted to do so outside of the established system. During the period leading up to World War II, there were two men who were on opposing