preview

US History: The Pros And Cons Of US History

Decent Essays

US history is a subject that does not appeal to most high school students. It is often taught very selectively, mainly discussing the greatest achievements of the history of our nation. History textbooks commonly avoid circumstances that can reflect poorly on the national character of the United States. One example is the unknown side of Christopher Columbus which is shielded from the young minds of history students. History is often taught in bits and pieces, which mold and manipulate themselves into something completely separate from history itself. A pro of US history being taught in such a way is that it can show that we, as a nation, have accomplished in the span of the founding of the land to present day. Some authors and editors may …show more content…

By not being taught the actual events that took place on the specific date in time, this could hinder their knowledge of their own country, and that can affect the student in crucial future endeavors. Contrary to the pros of selective and biased history, another con is that the US is “never wrong”. We seem to forget on a day-to-day basis that our America has done some bad things. If the US had an event where they were at fault or considered wrong, then they should be shown as wrong and at fault, not as a country “who despite setbacks, made the best of it and overcame these obstacles” My opinion heavily agrees with the last statement. The history curriculum within the US is teaching the students lies, and if the class is to be taught, the most crucial points should be chosen and taught as truthfully as possible. If my personal position were different, say if I was black, Native American, or Jewish, I would feel infuriated. These races are considered widely as minorities, and them not to be discussed other than for a few paragraphs would be an outrage. These races are seen by some as “not important”, but to someone of that race, I would try and defend my position on including these minority groups in US history …show more content…

Loewen, is a degenerative process (much like calcification) that makes people over into heroes. Through this process, our educational media turn flesh-and-blood individuals into pious, perfect creatures without conflicts, pain, credibility, or human interest. This chapter discussed two people, widely regarded as heroes, Woodrow Wilson, the 28th US president, and Helen Keller, an American author, political activist, and lecturer. Some of the main points of the theme I read about was that most textbooks are studded with biographical vignettes of the famed and esteemed, and that some of those vignettes aren’t very deserving. As taken from Lies My Teacher Told Me “Is Chester A. Arthur more deserving of a space than, say Frank Lloyd Wright? Who influences us more today- Wright, who invented the carport and transformed domestic architectural spaces, or Arthur, who, um, signed the first Civil Service Act?” Another main point is under the jurisdiction of the textbook authors and editors to consider who qualifies as a hero and who isn’t up to par with those said qualifications. One important key point was how heroification is quite crippling to students, and students are learning, what Loewen calls, “the Disney version of history”. Students then end up with non-realistic role models to look up to and get inspired by, because they don’t know the full background of the person, because heroification makes them seem as this immortal-like person with

Get Access