USudent Plagiarizes Prize-Winning Photography Case Study

The main type of argument used in this article is Evaluation Argument. An example is because Lukianoff points out that students were doing a demonstration on why microaggressions were offensive. The students had to stop because the demonstration was causing students to trigger.

to argue against the media that caused fear to erupt in the public. To begin his essay, he explains

2. The argument in his essay that was the most effective would be when he said “The minute I got off the plane in Yemen last year, I could see how everything I thought about that country was wrong.” He uses methods of proof such as anecdote, personal experiences and description in order to show us what Yemen is really like. He talks about his experience in Yemen and how he actually learned something

What specific evidence and examples does the author use to support this argument? Do you think they are convincing?

“Are there rival causes?” (p. 128) This question helps evaluate an argument’s strength by examining any other reasonable causes

The first strategy described by the author is to always know who is arguing and where they are coming from. By identifying the author’s viewpoints and meaning of their statements, you can better understand their stance: what it is and how they want it conveyed. When writing, it is also important to exude such qualities to your audience for formal and direct purposes.

Argument/Finding (What position did the author take? What were their main points? What are their claims/conclusions?) (75)

In submitting this assignment with this cover page, I am hereby stating that: (1) I have voluntarily read, understand, and agree to uphold and abide by the syllabus plagiarism policy for this class; (2) I have neither plagiarized any other author’s written material or unwritten ideas or enabled (intentionally or unwittingly) other students to plagiarize any part of this assignment; (3) I have neither shown or even discussed my assignment with any other student; and (4) I voluntarily accept the consequences stipulated in the syllabus plagiarism policy for this class should my statements in (1), (2), or (3) above prove false.

The art of quoting and summarizing an argument is one of the main skills to acquire when it comes to writing a successful piece of work. In the book, They Say I Say the art of inserting quotations is mentioned to be one of the highest mistakes made by writers. Many insert a quote that has no frame of introduction or background information which is considered a “hit and run quote.” Readers need to be able to comprehend not only the writings, but the background information and quotes from another author writing in order to have the whole work cohesive. Dire necessity for the writer is to go back to the initial text and truly understand the background from which they are quoting to make sure their audience understands the quote and why

The way he captures the reader’s attention and inserts his argument is mainly by using hyperbole. Hyperbole is an over exaggerated statement, he uses this is his text as he states “This was I-95 in downtown Miami, proud home of the worst darned drivers in the world.” He uses hyperbole in that sentence to state that he believes the drivers in downtown Miami are among some of the worst in the world. But how does he know they are the worst?

7. Are there any logical fallacies (pp. 394-397) in the argument? (you need to find at least 6+ fallacies). You need to identify which sentences in the story are fallacies and specify which fallacy (or fallacies) they violate. For example:

Read the following short essay, and then write a 3-5 page response (12-point font, double-spaced, normal margins, no cover page, no binders). Your response should do the following three things: (1) state what the main conclusion of the essay is; (2) state what the most important premises (including sub-conclusions) are—i.e., state which premises are most important if the argument is to rationally convince its audience; (3) evaluate the quality of the argument, giving detailed reasons to justify your evaluation. For purposes of evaluation, assume that the speaker is a contemporary Canadian philosopher and the audience is a group of students in Introduction to Philosophy.

What are the main concepts presented in the article? What information is the author using, and what is its relationship to the main issue? Does the information used appear relevant, significant, valid, and sufficient for the conclusions being drawn? Do you have enough information to determine whether the information is relevant, significant, and valid?

3. State one assumption the writer makes and explain it. (What does the author simply believe is essential to the argument but does not state directly?) The author wants to make a

2. How does Brendan O’Niell argue for his views in text 2? Give examples from the text.