Utopia Do Not Work In A Free Society

The connotations of a paradise, or a utopia, are that of a flawless society where its patrons do not pursue nor indulge in the near inherit need for materialistic conquests; however, such is not possible as demonstrated by real life occurrences and the certainty of human expansion. America has pushed past its parameters, seeking more territory within its frontiers as the demand for land rises with its population; it’s because of the exponential growth of mankind that utopias cannot be sought. Varieties of different dispositions cannot be merged, and because of such shows the flaw that human nature has in its design: diversity. Yet America embraces its diversity and advertises itself as a country accepting of all different backgrounds—so one can postulate that maybe America is a

Garden City, Ville Radieuse, and Octagon City. (io9.gizmodo.com). The reason for failure was the simple fact of nothing can ever be perfect. Everyone will always have different point of views. One place which they say was supposed to be a utopian society in Texas is Post,Texas. Post, Texas which was established for people who worked for post the cereal was meant to be perfect. This town also failed in becoming

This society is full of violence and drugs which affect innocent people every day. This society is so corrupted it is really hard to trust anyone. The society of Bluefield is different from any other society. Bluefield was founded to make a difference and to encourage the rest of the world to change. Bluefield offers peace, comfort and a lot of happiness, it is different because it also offers free beds and free insurance. Bluefield will be different from this society.

In the era when capitalism was booming workers faced very harsh working conditions and little job security. The workers were the very last ones to benefit from their own work, “the products of capitalism invariably benefit[ed] the ‘wealthy’ first”(DiLorenzo, pg.96). Workers worked long hours sometimes even a 24 hour shift and maybe got a day off every two weeks, with a typical work week of 50-54 hours, where today it is only 40 hours. Due to this era being big on industrialism that meant machines were constantly replacing workers, that is “new machine techniques replacing old human skills

Throughout history, many utopian societies have been established in hopes of creating a protected and uniform environment. In order to maintain a perfectly equal and errorless environment, some basic human rights are often violated. Many of the utopian principles put in place are based on the fear that the citizens will gain knowledge and notice the absence of their basic human rights. Unfortunately, once the citizens figure out that the government has infringed on their civil liberties they become disillusioned and want to revolt. This ultimately causes dissention and unhappiness throughout the utopia, which defeats the sole intention the leaders had when creating it. To avoid the rebellion, leaders of utopian experiments infringe on

One of the many things that make Utopia an ideal society is how their work habits differ from the world we live in. All citizens in Utopia work on farms along learning a useful skill that they learn at an earlier age through apprenticeship. Children learn trades such as blacksmithing weaving, carpentry, or tailoring. But if a young boy shows a desire and proficiency in another skill, arrangements are made for that young man to learn under another apprenticeships. The only citizens that are exempted from manual labor, are those who show great intellectual potential; these members assume jobs such as ambassadors and priests. In European society, people are expected to work unreasonable hours each day. Meanwhile in Utopia, their day is already planned out. They only work six, three before lunch, and then 3 after, the sleep for eight

In Utopia, Sir Thomas More wrote, “ A king who can only rule his people by taking from them the pleasures of life show that he does not know how to govern free people “. More also wrote, “ When a ruler enjoys wealth and pleasure while all about him are grieving and groaning, he acts as a jailor rather than a king”. More meant a leader who governs his people by taking their wealth away from them does not know how to govern free people. By taking their wealth away they are not free because the leader is controlling them. The leader has the power of their money to control them. A leader cannot take someone’s earnings away from them, especially their wealth, people work hard for their money and it should not be taken away by their leader just because he wants control over them. If a leader were to do that the people will be dependent on their leader for their money and things they need. If they don’t get their money when they are suppose to the people will act in an angrily matter and it will cause crimes. Definitely, More claimed in his piece that leaders should not take their people’s wealth and pleasure from them especially when they are

Possibly due to the time period in which it was written, More does not mention any other type of intellectual labour. Concepts such as designers are obsolete as all the Utopians wear the same clothes, which citizens sew for themselves. This creates a distinct area of division in the labour available to the citizens, who seem to thus be limited to mostly physical vocations. Furthermore, women are given specific types of labour due to, what Bellamy and More argue, their physiological differences from men not simply because of their sex. This relates to the importance of physical labour in both texts, where the productivity of the citizens is intended to be maximised to maximise the benefit to the society as a

Firchow, Peter Edgerly. "George Orwell's Dystopias: From Animal Farm to Nineteen Eighty-Four." Bloom's Literature. Facts On File, Inc. Web. 11 Mar. 201

A utopia sounds like a wonderful thing. The Oxford English Dictionary defines “utopia” as an “imagined or hypothetical place, system, or state of existence in which everything is perfect, esp. in respect of social structure, laws, and politics.” (OED, 2015, entry 2) But what happens when someone tries to bring this imagined land of perfection into reality? Both in fictional literature and in real life applications, utopian dreams destroy societies.

An utopian society can be defined as a most ideal place where everyone desire. Utopia is an imaginary place for some characteristics that actually cannot be achieved for. But still many people had tried to create a utopia for their earnest will to live in a best society. Now day people’s situation, which can be said as abject and hopeless, had made them to dream of a wonderland that cannot exist. Brook Farm, Kibbutz, and Walden Two are some examples for the created utopian society. They all have some incompleteness, because there would be many irony factors to create a real utopia, but they can be said as some relatively complete utopian societies. The best over these three examples will probably be the Walden Two society, because it has the

In a perfect utopian society everyone gets what they need because communication, understanding, and open mindedness of different ideas would be key. In order for a society to be a utopia, everyone has to be comfortable and be provided with their wants and needs and everything needs to function perfectly. In order for function and equality, people must compromise in thoughts and ideas to provide for everyone. To do that, one must have a good understanding of why others may think differently and have the ability to accept that. One of the many reasons our Earth is not a utopia is because of the competition and contradictory understandings of people, and the inability to accept other’s ideas. You do not have to believe what others believe, but respect for separate thought would make the world better. If everyone had their thoughts heard, were more sympathetic of different ideas and more capable of compromise, then there would possibly not be such gaps in social standing and humans dying from lack of basic needs while others bathe in gold.

     Sir Thomas More writes, in his book Utopia, about a society that is perfect in practically ever sense. The people all work an equal amount and everything they need for survival is provided. Most importantly is that everyone living in this perfect society is happy and content with their everyday lives. In this society everybody supports everyone. The community is only as strong as its weakest link. For society to progress everyone must work together. Opponents of the Utopian system, however, feel that the strong should not have to look after the weak. Progress would be maximized if all the resources are spent on the people most qualified to help society. A Utopian society, as perfect as the one

Utopia- good place, or in other words, no place. Thomas More, in his work Utopia, describes a nation in a parallel universe free from greed, pride, immorality, poverty, and crime; told as a narrative of a well-traveled explorer Hythloday to Moore himself, Hythloday speaks of a nation founded purely upon rationality, efficiency, and perfect morality. Thomas More’s work is no political or social theory, but rather a social critique and a commentary. In an age experiencing political and social struggle across every aspect of Western civilization along with the flooding of ancient and new ideas, Utopia is More’s way of discovering and exploring man’s and society’s natural structures and tendencies, and expressing his discontent towards them- this is shown in the narrative, as the dialogue of Hythloday and More represent his conflicted view between the ideal and the pragmatic. Acknowledging these flaws, More’s work critiques the utopian society from the perspectives of an imperfect man, but also vice versa.

In our lives today, we take advantage of all the luxuries that are presented daily. Freedom alone is one of the greatest luxuries we possess as an American nation. In Death and Life of Great American Cities by Jane Jacobs and Utopia by Thomas Moore, we are presented two life styles, which some might consider very similar in various ways. Both authors focus on a peaceful living lifestyle, to better the people of the nation. Although some of their specific details are different, I believe that Jacobs would definitely approve of the features that More develops in Utopia.