preview

Violations Between Gold Seal Accredited Facilities And Child Care Facilities

Decent Essays

Winterbottom and Jones (2014) conducted a quantitative research study that examined the occurrence of different types of violations between Gold Seal accredited facilities and child-care facilities that had not been awarded the Gold Seal designation. The researchers explored the data on facilities that were licensed by department of children and family (DCF) therefore, focused on 4325 child-care facilities. Of those facilities, 995 (23%) were accredited and 3330 (77%) were not accredited. The researchers used data available for public use located on the DCF website. All of the facilities in the counties that were under the jurisdiction of DCF were analyzed using 4 years of data from January 2007 until December 2010. Statistical data analysis was conducted using mean, standard deviations, frequency, and percentages. The results indicated that Class I violations were low in Gold Seal programs than programs that were not Gold Seal accredited. Class I violations were the most serious and posed imminent threat to child’s safety; class II violations were less serious and class III violations were least serious and but could pose low potential harm. Findings suggested that children who attended facilities that were not Gold Seal accredited were more at risk of a Class I violations. The study suggests that accredited programs have better quality than non-accredited programs (Winterbottom & Jones). Maher Ridley, McWilliam, and Oates (2000) conducted a mixed method research study

Get Access