preview

Volume Control Ventilation Research Paper

Decent Essays

Assist Control Volume Control Ventilation Volume control ventilation is chosen by a lot of clinicians because it allows tidal volumes and flows to be delivered consistently providing a consistent PaCO2 levels. When the volumes are set correctly for the patients ideal body weight and disease, A/C-VC can be used safely and avoid alveolar over distention.14 In A/C-VC the clinician sets the tidal volume, the maximal inspiratory flow rate, which does not vary and can cause ventilator dyssynchrony, the variable is pressure in this mode.15 If the patient has an increase in airway resistance or decrease in compliance, higher pressures are given to deliver the tidal volume, alarms should be set to inform the clinician of any sudden changes that would …show more content…

Volume Assist Control Ventilation Inverse ratio ventilation and Airway pressure release ventilation were also looked at in this study and they found only a short term benefit to patients with ARDS and was not recommended due to lack of trials with these modes showing an improvement in mortality.1 When looking at these two modes of ventilation in 2012, A/C-VC is flow-cycled, time cycled ventilation, A/C-PC is pressure-targeted, time cycled ventilation.15 There are no automatic adjustments from the ventilator in either of these modes. Further complications with mechanical ventilating patients with ARDS are alveolar over distention, opening and closing of the alveoli, oxygen toxicity, biotrauma. This can further affect the pulmonary and systemic system from the alveolar over distention that can cause more lung inflammation and lead to multiple organ system dysfunction. A/C-PC and A/C-VC both have advantages and disadvantages that will benefit patients with ARDS, which a clinician with great skill can implement for the benefit of the patient following hospital protocols and that is more important than the specific mode of ventilation for complex ARDS patients. Doctor John J. Marini said "I will argue that pressure regulation is safer than flow-regulated volume

Get Access