preview

Was William Of Normandy Justified

Satisfactory Essays

William of Normandy was the legitimate heir to the throne of England in 1066 for many reasons. Legitimacy is the realness of something or someone that is valid,supported,and accepted.He was a legitimate ruler because he had military accomplishment, he had justification from the religious world, and he had the peoples approval. One criteria William of Normandy met to meet the standards of being a legitimate king was, he had military accomplishment. One example was when William went to war with Duke conan of Britanny, as the intense batlttle was filled with battle soldiers on horseback throwing lances, and trying to set fire to the defences, and it finaly came to an end when the mighty conan surrendered. Another military accomplishment William of Normandy had was after Willam heard that Harold overtook king after king Eward died, William was furious. This caused him to organize a fleet of warships and invade England, and the Battle of Hastings has offically begun. The long and violent battle is hardly faught, with men on the ground, and as William …show more content…

One example of this is, when he offically became king of England he gave lands out to the people. Most notibily, he gave land to the churches because the pope supported his claim to the English throne, therefore he had religous support to his rulership. Another example of his religous justification is, his half brother Odo. He made Odo the Bishiop of Bayeux, and even built a catherdiral there. Odo was always on Williams side in battle, by leading prayers for victory..(“Britan’s Bayeux Tapestry ar Reading Museum”) Finally, William had receieved the oath of allegiance from Harold, which is another justification he recieved from the religous aspect of life.(Crack ¨Batle of Hastings 1066”) overall, throughout Williams rule, the religous life was a big part in his sucession and support he had, from the pope to his half brother who became the

Get Access