Introduction
It is being known that clothes make a man or a woman and by all means, this is a true statement regarding the United States military. Soldier’s uniforms symbolize everything from branch, rank, position, loyalty, and prestigious. The image of a sharp outfit creates a psychological, moral booster and spirit de corps of Soldiers. As a general rule, Soldiers are identified by their uniforms. Each uniform has multiple components that have a legacy and a history behind. Although Soldiers have pride in wearing the United States Army Uniform, a few of them don’t know the origin and purpose of each part of the uniform. Every part has its purpose, and it was strategically made based on the necessities in the battlefield.
Historical
…show more content…
Uniforms design, colors, and attributes were influenced of European armies.
The Camouflage
Historically, military uniforms were primarily about identity, pride, and recognition; however, at the beginning of the twentieth century, military uniforms become less decorative and more attuned to the need of the Soldiers This was the though when it comes to camouflage. A Soldier 's life might depend on it. Camouflage was first understood by hunters as far as from prehistoric time. These hunters observed and understood how an animal had a protection beyond just teeth and claws. They discovered that most animals could mix it with a natural background such as trees, leaves, and rocks, make them undetectable to other animals and humans. The military has little used at the beginning of these techniques. There are few examples of the use of camouflage in ancient and medieval warfare because camouflage was rare at that time. A well-known example of camouflage was during the 17th century when William Shakespeare described the medieval warriors that were ready to march on Macbeth at his fortress at Dunsinane (Newark, Newart, & Borsarello, 1996).
The Headgear
The Director of the Non-Commissioned Officer Heritage and Education Center, Mr. Mark R. Henry, stated that historically, nations copy the design of the uniform from the most successful units in combat and without a doubt, the United States Army did that.
The most
Advances of technology are allowing manufacturers to consider and create new styles of military apparel and accessories to assist warriors in future battles. Special Operations Command wants gear to support fighters in spaces they’ve not yet experienced. Climates such as the Arctic and jungles are environments where U.S. troops do not typically
The author argues the “combat masculine-warrior paradigm is the essence of military culture. This paradigm persists today even with the presence of “others” (e.g. women and gays) who do not fit the stereotypical image of combatant or masculine warrior.” In a 5-paragraph essay, discuss how the presence of women or gays will cause the military culture to change.
Color Guard: Now and Then Gracie D. Dupre Bethel University U.S. History 212 April 1, 2018 Abstract This essay contains information on the evolution of color guard. From the meaning of the sport to the uniforms, there will be information present. Color guard began in roughly 1805 to 1810, when armies started using flags and banners to represent their regiment.
“To enlist. To slam the door impulsively on the past, to shed everything down to my last bit of clothing, to break the pattern of my life—that complex design I had been weaving since birth with all its dark threads, it’s unexplainable symbols set against a conventional background of domestic white and schoolboy blue, all those tangled which required the dexterity of a virtuoso to keep flowing—I yearned to take giant military shears to it, snap! bitten off in an instant, and nothing left in my hands but spools of khaki which could weave only a plain, flat, khaki design, however twisted they might be”
The black rank insignia on the collars and the vividly colored ribbons 1/8 of an inch above the left breast pocket tell tales of my accomplishments. It doesn't tell the whole story of my career, though. It doesn’t show the countless push-ups, marching, hours standing at attention, chin up, chest puffed out, eyes straight, that I endured. Leading others, both young and old, and learning lessons of discipline from hardened Marines through a little bit of vocal motivation helped lift most of my body out of the water.
While much is made about the toxic culture of military hypermasculinity, there is another side of military culture that does not receive the same amount of attention from the civilian world. As Claire Duncanson suggests, civilians often only see the more robust and rugged aspects, “many accounts of military training demonstrate how gender informs this process, as all things ‘feminine’ are disparaged, and ‘manhood’ is equated with toughness under fire.” Although this narrative of masculinity in the military does persist, there is also the facet of military culture which places emphasis on teamwork, loyalty, and other values the military attempts to supplant in their soldiers beside physical proficiency and armed mastery.
The Army has given me a lot of opportunities and a different way of life. As I approach retirement, overall the Army has changed in many areas from the time I joined. There are many people, events, and situations that have taken place which have encouraged me to be successful in the Army. Even though, sometimes were fun and other times it was rough, however I would not change anything because it has made me into the person I am today. The Army overall as a whole has changed. When I was a Basic Training Drill Sergeant the privates had a more privileged that when I went to Basic training. I could remember standing in a line for hours only to use the public phone for about 10 minutes to speak to your family members. Now, they use their cell phones all day on Sunday and then turn it in at the end of the day at formation. Battle Dress uniforms with black boots are now Army Service Uniform with tan boots. The physical training uniforms has changed about two times since I’ve been in the military. First we wore the grays which was horrible because when it rained your physical training uniform would stick to you. Then has changed to the gray shirt and black shorts, which is better because it kept the wind off of you and does not stick to your body unlike the gray uniform. Now, the Army has switched again to black physical training uniforms which are lighter in weight but have no protection from the rain during the summer and none during the winter from the wind because
The only thing sexier than a man in uniform…is the same man out of it.
Let’s look at the myth of the British Soldiers, the reason behind their red coats and why this myth still circulates today. First, let’s discuss the myth of the British soldiers. Their uniforms they were red and white. The majority of their uniform was white. So rationally speaking, it wouldn’t make sense.
For their commement, dedication and service to this country uniforms are a symbol for their service and evoke admiration and awe. Respect the uniform, but above that thank the man, woman and family behind it. For Behind every individual who serves their nation is a family who has made equal sacrifices. Furthermore the service provided by military personnel is not limited to their time in uniform. Amongst us live men and women who have made the unspeakable sacrifices that have influenced their lives substantially, be it mentally or physically these men and women will never forget the sacrifices they have made for their country. Even after taking off the uniform, we as a nation must continue to thank these men and women for their service, because they must certainly will never forget. And to the families which have made the ultimate serves we have a responsibility to not only honor their loss but to stand besides them in times of
Uniforms have been worn by kids since 1552. Uniforms were worn by kids from England or from private schools, then public schools for centuries. The United States had kids wearing uniforms, but not many from public schools. “In 1996, the US Department of Education found that only 3% of public schools required uniforms” (Dressed 1). When the US Department of Education
Reconnaissance and camouflaging of men and materials are common practice in military operations. Camouflaging is done mostly in the battlefield for concealing a person from enemy watch. This is generally performed by means of color and pattern matching with the surrounding environment. The major aim behind the use of color and pattern matching with the surrounding environment is to make the target of interest visually disruptive16. It is quite difficult to differentiate and identify a person visually wearing dress with green and brown color patterns in vegetated areas, tan color in desert areas and white color in snowy areas. Therefore, efficient camouflage detection is strongly demanded in order to have a strategic advantage in the planning of successful military operations.
The Ninja’s of ancient times would use whatever they could to camouflage themselves on their various missions, themselves becoming the F-22’s of their time. They utilized color patterns that would simply blend in with the background, becoming patches in the land the eye simply would not focus on, and that is the basis of visual camouflage; to fool the enemy into thinking he sees nothing.
Uniforms are an identifying outfit or style of dress worn by the members of a given profession, organization, or rank. (Dictionary.com) A typical uniform consist of dark pants or shorts for boys, skirt for girls, and a shirt or a blouse. Students can also buy and wear a T-shirt with the school logo but it is not common. School uniforms first became popular in the United States in the mid 1900’s and originated from England. The major movement towards uniforms in state schools began with President Bill Clintons State of the Union speech in 1996. President Clinton stated in his speech that "If it means that teenagers will stop killing each other over designer jackets, then our public schools should be able to require their students to wear
It all started in England. In 1222, the first uniform ever was recorded. It was similar to a robe and was called a “cappa clausa”. However, modern school uniforms began in the 1500’s when a boarding school in England required a blue cloak and yellow stockings. More schools picked up the trend until private and preparatory schools were practically known for them. Today, most of England’s elementary and secondary schools wear uniforms to unite the children regardless of their financial situation. The controversy with school uniforms is mainly in the US, however, and began in Washington DC and Maryland. The schools gave the option to wear school uniforms and noticed a decrease in behavioral issues, so more schools switched over. In1994, a California school district released the first statistical information on the benefits of school uniforms (Meleen). That is where the debate starts today. Many people disagree about whether or not uniforms are good for children’s development and if a notable impact can be seen by schools who make the switch. People also think that because public schools are funded by the government and there were no laws on uniforms that they should not be legal.