What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of A 360 Degree Feedback System

3600 feedback is a process in which someone’s performance is assessed and feedback is given by a number of people who may include their manager, subordinates, colleagues and customers (Michael Armstrong 2009:644). The debate surrounds a point of whether it offers a means of overcoming the traditional limitations of appraisal.

Although performance cannot be judge alone with 360-degree assessment, it provides a commentary aspect that will assist an organization in Leadership Development and Succession Planning. Including the 360-degree appraisal in the performance management process will provide a broader perspective about an employee’s performance and detail to annual appraisal. In addition, the technique facilitates greater self-development for an employee. Moreover, it enables an employee to compare his or her self- evaluation about performance with the perceptions of others.

Many of the systems in the body are delicate. They function only under a specific range of parameters.

Helping performance raters avoid bias is an important factor in creating a legally sound performance management system (Aguinis, 2013). All people leaders will be required to attend yearly and bi-yearly training to help manage the performance of employees. They will also be required to justify their ratings to their direct leader. Once the leader approves the rating, the performance review will be made available to the employee. The employee will be able to leave feedback and sign the performance review. Once signatures have been received the performance review will not be

Next, the 360-Degree Feedback is also used to measure an employee’s performance. Through research, the 360-Degree Feedback sole purpose as David Bracken states is to “be seen merely as a tool or used as a one-time event. Rather, it must be understood as part of an ongoing process of assessment, performance evaluation, and discussion of performance with supervisors, subordinates, peers, and others.” More so, the 360-degree feedback is useful when considering the employee’s feedback and leadership skills.

This assignment discusses two common errors that may occur when conducting a Performance Appraisal – the halo effect and rater bias.

Performance evaluations, when implemented properly, act as a tool for improving employee productivity, team performance and individual development. They can serve to raise self-esteem, increase motivation, strengthen relationships and foster ongoing communication and commitment (Simpson, 2001). I feel that these reviews play a critical role in the workplace and should remain a part of standard operating procedures, however many are beginning to disagree.

Like any capable instrument, it should be utilized with care so as to determine every one of the advantages. Here are seven proposals for maintaining a strategic distance from issues.

Therefore, it is suggested that she adopts a 360-degree feedback approach appraisal in order to get the opinions of not just the managers and supervisors, but, everyone.

Recently, I had the employees in my department complete a 360 review as part of the annual review process. Indeed, when the 360 review is conducted by an outside entity, analyzed, and reported; then, the feedback is both meaningful and truthful (Zenger & Folkman, 2012). Interestingly, the items I felt I was most proficient needed the most work.

Different feedback strategys have been used as efficent tools in the promotion of progress and improvement in the professional world (Baker, A. Perrault D. Alain, R., 2013). De Janasz et al. (2014) explains some positive outcomes that result from shariying, asking and getting feedback from others in within a workplace; such as improving and reforcing employee relationships, enforcing a gainnful comunication, promoting teamwork, and increasing the performance of employees. Specificly De Janasz et al. (2014) develops the idea that providing constructive feedback, sustained by strong interpersonal communication skills, enables the individual recognize their strengths and wiknesses in a clear and non risky way, in order to look for the most accurate plan to improve, and obtain significant and necessary behavioral changes. Everyday Feedback as part of an organization strategy help employees feel confident about their possition and process inside the company, and promotes a clear path to achieve personal and organizational goals (Baker, A. Perrault D. Alain, R. (2013); citado en Levy and williams,

Performance Management Within the Workplace The basis of the mainstream of performance appraisals within the modern workplace is one person (a manager or executive) rating one more, an intrinsically individual process. There are distinction such as 360 degree appraisals that include the judgment of others such as clientele and peers/colleagues in the process but it is the action of one person transitory judgment upon another that is subjective in nature and the root cause of many of the problems encountered in the research associated with performance appraisals. Performance appraisals are of importance to the organisation, as they often provide the only measure of an individual's contribution and

360 degree feedback system as a performance evaluation tool as long as the understanding of its intent is understood. “There are three key steps in the successful implementation of 360 degree feedback systems in an organization. The three steps are that it must fit the organizations culture, make it psychometrically sound, and used with care” (“Best Practices”, 2012). It is also important to train the feedback providers to be sensitive, respectful and polite. Treating employees in a friendly and respectful manner and offering constructive advice will make them more open to accepting the performance

In an article from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management [OPM] (n.d.) it stated that “without feedback, you 're walking blind, at best, you 'll accidentally reach your goal, and at worst, you will wander aimlessly through the dark, never reaching your destination.” Feedback is a critical element in a managers “toolbox” when evaluating employees. It gives an employee a view of how good or bad their previous performance was and what or if they need to improve in their performance. It also reduces

Isaacs (2014) contends that qualitative research is useful when the research focuses on complex issues such as human behavior and felt needs. The goal of qualitative research is therefore to help understand social phenomena with the help of views and experiences of all the participants. This qualitative study will examine the significance of performance appraisal ratings and feedback on employee behavior. The research focus is on data obtained from interview participants about their experiences during performance appraisals. Because of time constraints, this research will focus on previous research done in this manner and discuss their results. Performance Appraisals can be