What Are The Ethical Ethics Of Samsung

In recent years, increasing number of customers and businessmen start to concern about the ethical issues in businesses. Although the main purpose of business is to make profits, the social influence of it also appears to be focused by a large proportion of customers and businessmen. Corporate social responsibility (CSR), which is closely connected with this concentration, was put forward in 1953 with the meaning of interacting social, environmental, and economic considerations into the decision-making structures and processes of business (Industry Canada, 2013). Although criticized, there is a business case for CSR because it could enhance customers’ loyalty, improve

The appointment of Yun Jong Yong as president and CEO of Samsung in 1996 was symbolic to the beginning of the organizations transition from its previous business level strategy of cost-leadership to its now successful implementation of differentiation. Before refocusing the direction of Samsung’s strategy it was originally making most of it’s profits producing lower-priced appliances that cost-conscious consumers were more likely to pick up if they couldn’t afford a higher priced brand (i.e. Sony or Mitsubishi). Also during that time Samsung has established itself as a low-cost supplier of various components to larger and better-known manufactures around the world. Although the organization was profitable at the time the over-all cost leadership strategy implemented by Samsung was positioned to be vulnerable to future external threats that could send the company belly-up.

Once a business realizes that it has gotten wrapped up in maximizing profit that it neglect ethics of care, the next step is to readjust and realign its core values internally and be more responsible to the environment in which they operate by showing societal care. Therefore, the aim of this report is to address the importance of realigning the business with ethics of care through involving in CSR activities, and as well as showing how these actions can impact on a company’s performance even if it may be demoralized in the society.

However, today, the focus on stakeholder’s (apart from the shareholders, these are customers, suppliers and employees) expectations has also grown radically. Accordingly, ethical behaviours such as meeting stakeholders’ expectation objectives, environmental objectives and corporate social responsibility, which is accountability to the society and social responsibility, have resultantly become very important. Failure to comply with ethical behaviours can causes a business to damage its brand value and its reputation, which in turn could lead to reduced profits or even losses (Carroll and Buchholtz, 2014).

In this article, “The Truth About CSR,” authors Rangan, Chase and Karim stress the importance in aligning a company’s social and environmental activities with its business purpose and values (Rangan, Chase, & Karim, 2015, 41). Outcomes of CSR programs should be a “spillover” and not a primary focus of a business, expressing concern towards social responsibility and corporations failing to contribute to society accordingly (Rangan, Chase, Karim, 2015, 42). There is a great deal of importance in companies refocusing their CSR activities on a primary goal and in providing an organized process for bringing consistency and discipline to CSR strategies (42). Rangan, Chase and Karim want corporations to understand why it is important for them to evaluate their CSR activities and refocus them towards the goal of reinforcing the firm’s societal and environmental actions, while also ensuring their actions add to the overall purpose and values of the corporation. According to the authors, even though

The term ethics involves understanding and defending of what is right and what is wrong.

In other words, these socially responsible companies will evaluate not only the short and long term economic outcomes of their present decisions but also the long-term environmental and societal outcomes of their current actions. This thus leads to the triple bottom line approach of reporting environmental, social, and economic performance. In addition, Wilson from the Ivey Business Journal argues about corporate social responsibility or the CSR. The CSR has been around longer than the term and implication of “sustainable development” but has similar guidelines. From about 1953 the on, the main debate was whether corporate managers had an ethical responsibility to consider the needs of society and by 1980, it was generally and consensually accepted that corporate managers should and did have this moral responsibility. So by incorporating sustainability plans or even creating a separate branch dedicated to doing so, the company’s reputation often is increased, which over the long term, will contribute to accentuate customer loyalty, market share, and brand value and awareness. (Wilson, 2003) This case study done on Johnson & Johnson published by the IMA Educational Case Journal analyzes the impact that implementations of these sustainability

Ethics and the environmental responsibilities of companies tie directly into those of social responsibilities and occupy a very important position in both incorporating into strategic plans and the company’s value system. In this paper, the subject to describe is how the role of ethics and social responsibility is developed into a company’s strategic plan; this will enclose an example of how Enron initiated an overstepping of these ethical boundaries. The paper will also describe the internal and external environments of how Google, Amazon, and Microsoft using an environmental scan. Included in the scan will be a determination of the competitive advantages each

Corporate Social responsibility (CSR) has been viewed in different ways by different school of thoughts; some see it has a voluntary initiative, while others think it’s a main part of every company’s structure and even an opportunity to improve brand. For this work, we would take the position of the later argument. It is simply giving back to the environment that you gain from. It involves protection of the environment, development of quality of the occupants of the environment and improving their quality of life. Like Barnard (1938), it is analyzing the social, economic, moral, legal and physical aspects of the environment.

It is a viable alternative to apply CSR in Corporate and management strategies to outclass competing companies. An organization by carrying out its ethical principles and convictions in their activities and propagating them via organizational network influences the relationship with shareholders, clients and employees. The application of CSR can lead to social benefits and legitimacy for the firm since it can consider itself as a coalition in which the different stakeholders participate to gain their own benefit. (Freeman, 1984).

Instead, it is important to examine the possible routes, mechanism, and solutions to guide businesses to integrate its economic growth, managerial responsibilities, social and environmental negative impacts in an integrated framework of responsive liability, avoiding decisions lightly. Moreover, it's necessary to go through the real company intentions and reasons to structured corporate social responsibility (CSR) as companies value because it is growing the number of businesses that use this initiative as a strategy to alleviate pressures or avoiding governmental regulations or stakeholders demands (Küpers,

It is a known fact that Denmark’s firms have the best ethical behavior. Some of the Denmark’s well know global corporate leaders are Novozymes, Novo Nordisk, Maersk, Carlsberg, Vestas and Dong energy. All of these companies have taken a lead in CSR and incorporating circular economy, cradle to cradle concept. The definition of CSR has evolved. Companies use to integrate social and environmental issues in their business on a voluntary basis. In recent years it is becoming more of a responsibility of every company to identify, prevent and mitigate the possible adverse impacts of their businesses on the society. While

This research is compiled to explain how good ethical practices and good values in business can yield sustainability within the business and the society as a whole and in order to do this the concept of ethical business practice and values have to be understood.

‘Corporate social responsibility’ (CSR) means that the firm has wider responsibilities in relation to objectives and people apart from the owners or shareholders (Beal and Goyen 2005). These responsibilities are achieved when the firm adapts all of its practices to ensure that it operates in ways that meet, or exceed, the ethical, legal, commercial and public expectations that society has of business. Objectives often associated with CSR include a responsibility to manage natural assets sustainably and not to pollute by chemical discharge, smell, noise, dust or other irritants; fair treatment of employees and ethical attitude towards clients. The other people include employees, customers, suppliers,

Based on the articles that I’ve read up on , I’m going to talk about Samsung . Samsung is one of the world’s largest information technology company which has a very powerful influence on South Korea’s economic development . Samsung company produces some goods like , TV , Phone , computer and more . One of Samsung’s most successful products are its smartphones which has significantly dominated the world’s mobile phone industry . Samsung is currently one of the best smartphone in the market . Samsung electronic was found and made in 1969 as a unit of Samsung group . The unit was set up as a method for getting Samsung into the advance TV and customer hardware industries . By 1980 , samsung was assembling , transporting , and offering variety