What Are The Positive And Negative Results Of The Crusades

Did the crusades have a negative or positive effect. In 1095 pope urban the 2nd called the first crusade which was the start of something that would have an Positive effect on the Eastern empire and christianity. In 1905 the byzantine emperor Alexius Comnenus asked the Eastern empire for help after being threatened by seljuk turks and to aid the eastern empire pope urban called the first crusade so that they could fight back against the muslims with the Eastern empire and take back the holy lands. This crusade would lead to three more which would have a positive effect on christianity and the Eastern and Byzantine empires. Some positive effects were they found new food this also the crusaders conquered more land for the Eastern empire and found new clothing/material. The results crusades had many positive effects on the Eastern and Byzantine empire. One of which was that many more merchants were supporting them or selling to them and they also discovered new foods from the east. These two things helped the empire by allowing them to find new things through trade which ws increased because of the crusades because the crusaders would need more food and equipment. Document 2 states that “merchants in Venice and other northern Italian cities built large fleets to carry crusaders to the holy lands.” “They later used those fleets to open new markets in crusader states.” This shows that the merchants helped the crusaders and then they opened shops where the crusaders were so that

The impact of the crusades were more negative because they had bad reasons and because they fought nine times in the 13 centuries and many Christians were fighting against Jews. After the Christians and Jews fought the crusades still attacked each other.It also made lasting war between two religions.

The Crusades was a horrific time. Many people had lost their lives, friends, even family. The Crusades were a battle over the holy land, Jerusalem. The Crusaders, people who had fought in the Crusades, were Christians. They wanted the holy land because they believe that’s where Jesus had died and rose. They had fought against the Muslims who were defending themselves against the Crusaders. The Crusades had its positive outcomes as well as its negative results. Some may wonder, were the results of the Crusades more Positive or Negative? I strongly believe the outcome was mostly negative mainly because the Crusaders didn’t win the holy land, lots of lands were destroyed, and so many people lost their lives in the battle of the Crusades.

According to an article published in 2009, it is believed that there were a numerous effects of crusades:

The Crusades were a group of Christians that Pope Urban II started back in 1095. They also had 9 Crusades, or 9 times when they would attack to get the Holy Land, against the Muslims and Jews, but mostly against the Muslims. During those battles there were both positive and negative. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or negative? The Crusades were more negative than positive because they worsen their relationship with the Jews and Muslims, or religious hatred, they destroyed and betrayed their closest ally, and their towns or cities were difficult to handle.

Many people may wonder were the Crusades more beneficial or were more people against the things that crusaders did like war or the things the believed in. Many people think that the Crusades were more negative because of religious hatred and cause death. Also the Crusades were more negative because they were difficult to maintain.

The crusades were a combined of nine wars for the holy land in jerusalem. Were the results of the Crusades more positive or more negative?The results of the crusades were more negative. Because it grew religious hatred between the three also the crusaders sacked the city of constantinople.Also because of the slaughter of the jews which left hatred.

The war between two religions, christianity and islam took place between the eleventh century and the thirteenth century. This event was called the crusades. This event had many impacts, but were they good or bad? I think that it had a negative impact because it caused the churches to split, and the relationships of the religions was very negative.

Wars of different religions have been going on since the beginning. The biggest religious wars were between the Islam and Christendom, also known as the Crusades. The crusades lasted two-hundred years, thousands of people died. Many ask, were the Crusades more positive or negative? The outcome of the Crusades were more negative. They are more negative on behalf of two things, the Christians turned on each other and religious hatred.

The crusades were a time of rough battle between the 11th and 13th century between Christians and Muslims which are two big religions now. Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative? The crusades were more negative than positive, here are the reasons why: Crusades failed their main goal of conquering the holy lands, Left a bitter legacy of hatred behind them, and both Muslims and Christians committed appalling atrocities. The crusades were more negative than positive because they failed their main goal of conquering the holy land instead ruined cities. Document 4 states that the Crusaders stormed and sacked the city of Constantinople ruining the magnificent library and stealing thousands of relics that were sold in Europe,

The city of Jerusalem has always been a Holy land, first for Jews, then Christians, and later, Muslims. Unfortunately, this position of being hallowed ground also goes hand in hand with being a highly contested site. The pious Crusades initiated by Pope Urban II set in motion a long chain of events and left a lasting impression on the world. These Crusades were the livelihoods of a great many people, and a plight to a great many others. For the religions involved with the conflicts, the Crusades had very different implications. For Western European Christians, the significance was simple, the Pope had called them to action against “evil”. Muslims and Jews on the other hand faced an unexpected, and unwarranted, enemy. The modern chasm-like rift between Western and Middle Eastern culture is in direct relation to the Crusades, specifically the perspective take by each side. Although this

Before the Crusades began, in the 11th century, Western Europe had emerged with great power, while Mediterranean civilizations were being invaded by Seljuk Turks. After years of war, the general Alexius Comnenus took the throne of Byzantine in 1081 and consolidated control over the remaining empire as known as Alexius I ("Crusades."). By 1905, Alexius sent word to Pope Urban II asking for troops from the West to help face the Turkish threat. Alexius’ request came at a time when the relations between Christians from the east and west were improving. By November 1905, the pope had called on Western Christians to take up arms so they could aid the Byzantines and recapture the Holy Land from Muslim control (“Crusades”). The response was enormous, people from levels of the military, as well as ordinary citizens, joined the pilgrimage to take back the Holy Land.

The pursuit of the first Crusade played a huge role in the gaining control of Palestine from the Muslims however it also was brought on by the danger that was being seen by a ruler Alexius II Commenus of the Byzantine Empire. The danger that constant Noble was being forced by was the treat of Seljuks, Turks. The leader of the Byzantine Empire called upon for help from Pope urban the second who then turned to his people to help and how important war was in the Turkish lands which in turn would lead to the first Crusade.

The Crusades were a series of wars inspired by conflicting religious ideologies, specifically between Christians and Muslims. A series being, that between the years 1096 and 1291, nine major military expeditions occurred. Christian-Muslim interactions between the 1000-1500 centuries were mostly negative then positive. The justification for war included securing and gaining control of the “holy lands” or territories sacred to both groups (Damascus, The River Jordan, Jerusalem, and numerous others) and to diffuse or universalize their religious ideologies to those living in the eastern hemisphere. Jerusalem was considered the holiest of all sites, because it was significantly important to both religions, in different ways. To Christians, Jerusalem represents; the place of birth, ministry, crucifixion, and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth, the Savior or Messiah to Christianity. However, to Muslims, Jerusalem houses the Al-Aqsa Mosque (the third holiest site in Islam), in which they believe Muhammad was transported to during the Night Journey (a physical and spiritual journey) from the Sacred Mosque in Mecca. Islamic “hero” or leader of the Crusades, Saladin, is credited with re-conquesting Jerusalem from the Christians, uniting Muslim fractions and states, while enabling and promoting Islamic faith and practices to exist in Jerusalem.

provide a crucial means of transportation without which the crusade would be incapable of ever even taking off.