What Are The Similarities In Figure 14-Two?

health, people are likely to pair up with partners of averagely the same level of

In his article, The Strategies of Finding a Mate, David M. Buss discusses the act of finding a mate and the characteristics that people are drawn to in a mate. He begins the article with a brief look at the history of mating and the theories that have previously been proposed. In particular he addressed Charles Darwin’s theory of sexual evolution and belief in preferential mate choice. Buss proposes that there are three components to human mating. He states that “human mating is inherently strategic… mating strategies are context-dependent… [and that] men and women have faced different mating problems over the course of human evolution and, as a consequence, have evolved different strategies” (Buss, 1994, p. 241). He uses this theory to propose nine different hypotheses to prove that despite humans being varied and different from each other, all humans look for similar characteristics when trying to find a mate (Buss, 1994).

Both figure 18 and 19 are representing the same event of the birth Buddha. Figure 18 is from Amaravati, and Buddha is represented in aniconic form. The empty blothes held by the gods and the infant footprints on the clothes indicating Buddha. Figure 19 is from Gandhara, and Buddha is represented in iconic form. By compares the similarity in composition of this twp panel, we can defiantly state that they are illustrating the same event and same location of Lumbini.

5. Compare and contrast how filter theory and social exchange theory view dating and mate selection.

In the last few years a lot of research has been performed in the area of mate choice. This review highlights which kinds of signals affect our choice for a partner, discusses the most commonly known principles of beauty and considers the role of cultural differences and the beauty ideal propagated by the media.

In the article “Why We Form Relationships,” as well as in our textbook “Interplay”, the authors define certain aspects that influence why we choose the relationships we choose. They both show that appearance is a big part of what influences our choices. Most people are raised to not judge a book by its cover, however without even meaning to we decide who we will let in our circle within seconds of seeing someone. Along with appearance, we seek out similarities in others, such as same taste in food, liking the same sports teams, or having the same hobbies. We also look for people that can give us any kind of reward at low cost; whether that reward is tangible, such as a gift, or intangible, such as emotional support.

I would like to thank you for giving our consultant, Mr McGee the opportunity to come work with you. Our consultant, Mr McGee is a graduate from the University of Western Australia with a psychology degree. Mr McGee 's specific field is social psychology and has been working as one for over seven years now. He is an experienced psychologist and takes it as a profession. Our consultant can help your website “FindLove.com” in matching and finding the perfect couple and increase the reputation of your website. Our consultant 's aim is to assist by categorising each person by their attitudes, interests and similarities by adding new features which indicates these things. In this way, people are able to start interacting and socialising and getting to know those similar to them. This increases the chance of finding the perfect match by using the method of categorisation.

In this sense, we could also think of other relationship stages which are categorized before and after having a sexual relationships or having offspring with the sexual/romantic partner (or corresponding events such as having married/cohabited). Moreover, we could also add a biological component to the model to consider what kinds of adaptive problems we face when choosing and assessing potential or existing partners. Both men and women should react to familiarity with their partners with the ultimate aim to attain whatever qualities they need to solve adaptive problems effectively. For instance, when people themselves are in the stage of choosing mates or friends, familiarity should be a prerequisite to assess their quality as a desirable mating or cooperative partner, so that familiarity should promote a form of attraction designed to gather more information. On the other hand, once people get enough information and decide to commit to a relationship with the target, such as they are in the

The most important of factors in this practice are the preferences of those selecting mates. Mate preferences have a scientific importance for several reasons. Mate preferences for instance determine whoever is chosen or excluded. This therefore influences the current direction of sexual selection. Mate preferences also determine which members of the opposite sex are high or low in value. In turn, this influences various variables ranging from social status and desirability of the selected mate. The mate preferences of one sex also conversely influence retention techniques effective on members of the other gender. Such tactics substantiate the wants of the person, one is attempting to retain or attract. Another importance of mate preferences is the fact that some of them might be adaptations that might have psychologically developed over time. Such preferences represent crucial solutions to fundamental mating challenges such as selecting a fertile mate or one able and willing to invest in an offspring. The preferences of one’s mate might also reveal crucial cultural values that when interrogated over a certain period of time document the evolution of various cultural values (Chang, 2010). As such, mate preference is the first step in the process of mate selection which aptly determines one’s choice of a mate. As such, it is impossible to understand mate selection in a certain population without understanding patterns in mate preferences. Mate preferences are especially important in Asian cultures where they are traditionally passed on from one generation to the other. As one grows older, the preferred mates by parents are passed on. As such, one eventually chooses a mate who is more or less agreeable to the entire family. As such, it is imperative to approach and understand the process of mate selection as an interactive process that is subject to disparate factors and circumstances (Chang,

There are many people to meet out there, but when I decide to settle down, they have to meet three important standards. The first standard they must meet is that they must be kind. Kindness is needed because a person must demonstrate a compassion and understanding towards people. It shows that a person was raised well and cares about the feelings of others. My significant other would need to be kind because I would want them to have my back, and to treat me respectfully. Though it makes me feel guilty, physical appearance does affect my feelings for another person. If I don't find someone handsome, it makes me feel less of an attraction to them. My future partner needs to be someone that I love for themselves, and though I could accept most

People around the world have different views on what they are looking for in a spouse. It mostly depends on where and how they grew up. In the Indian culture, they usually have arranged marriages. Their parents put up ads in newspapers to show the criteria of what they are looking for in a spouse for their child. Some examples of the criteria Indians use are: age and height, family background, social class, skin color, how well their homemaking skills are, where they were educated, if they were taught english, how high of a degree they have, and their income. In the United States people often choose their spouses by meeting new people, matchmaking websites, or getting introduced to friends of friends. It is unusual for other people to make the decision for them. When choosing a spouse, Americans consider age, height, how family oriented the person is, if they share similar values and interest, religion, education, how attractive we think they are, and if they are trustworthy. Due to online dating the proximity of the person could be another factor.

The five factors that predict interpersonal relationships are: proximity, familiarity, similarity, physical appearance, and reciprocity. Proximity refers to the geographical location of persons. People are more likely to initiate, engage, or maintain relationships if someone’s geographical location is near or convenient to the person they are to pursue. Relationships, whether romantic or platonic, are not as likely to be initiated if the proximity does not allow individuals to cross paths or maintain a certain level of communication. As well, familiarity plays an important role in the fostering of relationships. People are said to have an increased attraction and fondness for individuals that they see more often than those they do not. In lay terms, similarity can be summed up by saying that people enjoy the presence of those like (or similar) to them. Individuals are more often drawn to and feel less intimidated by others that share their culture and belief systems; thus, are more likely to form relationships with them. Next, is physical attractiveness; which can be defined in two different ways. First off, people tend to believe that beautiful things equal good things and are more likely to seek out relationships with individuals they find beautiful. However, people are also likely to form relationships with people they believe to be on

Two qualities you might seriously consider are honesty and openness and or flexibility. You need to be able to trust your partner to be straight up with you about everything in your life this includes their own preferences, things they are doing, people they are spending time with. In addition, you will want to choose someone who is open to re-evaluate themselves, to work on their own flaws, and willingness to take responsibility for their own actions, and able to move with the rapid flow of the river of life.

The phenomenon I am studying is what men and women want in a significant other. Relationships are an important factor in happiness for people overall but I wanted to see if there was anything one gender was specific on more than the other. I researched personal advertisements to understand what each gender is looking for and how they describe themselves online. My hypothesis for this project is men will be more willing to find someone for a short period of time whereas the women will be looking for a long-term relationship in their potential advertisements.