Indigenous knowledge systems different from written Western science traditions? Indigenous knowledge comprise of all knowledge pertaining to particular people and its region, with the nature of knowledge transmission being primarily oral via generations. Knowledge such as scientific, agricultural, technical as well as ecological knowledge is all part of the Indigenous knowledge. Indigenous knowledge has some distinct features that are not seen in Western science traditions. Unlike Western science traditions
This case helped set the precedent in cases that “whiteness” should be defined scientifically. Najour found naturalization and citizenship in America; however, the Court still was equivocal about whether they would classify “white” based on science or common knowledge. After seeing the success Najour had with his case, Takao Ozawa attempted to gain citizenship based on his assimilation into American culture. Ozawa provides a legal brief to demonstrate how he met both the racial and non-racial
accuracy; as a result, we must remain open-minded towards future changes. The conflict between science and religion is often seen as a clashing of ideologies, rather than a power struggle over public authority, due to the generalization and lack of clarification among the common people regarding the nature of the conflict. As mentioned in Viney’s lecture, individuals important to the field of science, such as William of Ockham, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Galileo Galilei, were not attacked by the Church
The knowledge produced by natural sciences, social sciences and humanities makes up the vast majority of knowledge in modern academic cultures. When the question about how the knowledge produced by these three cultures differs is raised, answers cover more than one aspects. Jerome Kagan stated that “the primary concerns, sources of evidence, and concepts remain the most important nodes of differences among them”(2). His viewpoint provides me a new sight to classify the knowledge I learned, am learning
the society, and sociology is the structure and function of human society. In as much disciplines have a link with interdisciplines, it is important to note that both has difference ideology in the academic studies. Interdiscuplines is a form of knowledge that create or establish field of study that enable student produce, ask question, solve problem, and explain words with understanding as well as create some new ideas. And discipline is a field of study that has already establish by interdisciplinarity
the society, and sociology is the structure and function of human society. In as much disciplines have a link with interdisciplines, it is important to note that both has difference ideology in the academic studies. Interdiscuplines is a form of knowledge that create or establish field of study that enable student produce, ask question, solve problem, and explain words with understanding as well as create some new ideas. And discipline is a field of study that has already establish by interdisciplinarity
each human groups are. Because science is objective and believed to be trustworthy resources, we accept what science tells us without being skeptical. When going against what science has already proven, it is a long process to approve of the theory that completely breaks the previous theory. Therefore, once scientifically proven ideas are established, whether or not these ideas might become wrong in the future, they will remain in public
patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), potential benefits, and harm during management of underlying cause, and analysis of glycemic index hemoglobin A1c (HgbA1c) in managing diabetic ESRD patients. Diabetes is one of the frequent reasons and common persistent complications of ESRD (Kovesdy, Park, & Kalantar-Zadeh, 2010). According to the United States Renal Data System (USRDS), diabetes is the primary cause leading to ESRD. Among 20.8 million diabetic population, approximately 232,984 were
that is true? That's simply what the brain is telling us is true." So what does it really mean to be human? Is there a correct answer, or are there wrong answers? Is everything that you personally believe correct because there is no definite answer to this perplexing question? I feel that each response has hit on key factors of what society, religion, and science classify as "human". For example, DNA ties us all together, and is something that we all have in common (whether we like it or not).
Selling ASAP: Art, Science, Agility, Performance was written by Eli Jones, Larry Chonko, Fern Jones, and Carl Stevens. The book gives light to the fact that selling has become both a creative and an analytical process. In today’s world, the marketplace and the sales profession are continuously changing. Therefore, creativity, critical thinking, and agility are needed to adjust to these changes. Customers are now leaning towards trusted advisors instead of product experts. This concept stresses the