Hello Professor and Naobe, For as long as warfare and weaponry existed, methods to protect oneself from injury or death resulted in armor. Going back to the ancient Greeks, the Spartans were notorious for their helmets and shields. As time passes, weaponry and armor evolve. During the time of early firearms, I believe plate armor was being used and was effective against traditional weaponry such as bows and arrows and blades. There is a picture on page 260 of the textbook that depicts a battle with the majority of people wearing some type of armor. The new weaponry, cannons, and firearms, provided a way of getting through this armor, explosions. I found a video that shows an example of early firearms piercing through plate armor.
My second reason is that the knights had very strong and effective armour, whereas the samurai’s armour was always changing and was never as good as the knight’s armour, as samurai depended more on their fighting skills instead of the armour. The samurai armour was made up of several sections. The main body is called a do or cuirass, and is made from plates or lamellae (small oblong-shaped pieces of steel linked by strips of leather and covered with layers of lacquer). The helmet has a crest and a hair pommel. There is also a face mask, which would have been decorated with ugly features intended to scare the enemy. Extra protection is provided by a coverage of the neck (made of jointed metal) and shoulder guards (made from small plates laced together, with silk allowing movement). Thigh and calf guards are made from a combination of chain mail and plates. Underneath the samurai’s armour, the samurai would wear a one-piece baggy garment with a special kimono (the kimono looks a bit like a dressing gown). This did mean that the samurai would be more likely to get injured, as the armour would only offer very little protection. Samurai armour was designed to help the Samurai move comfortably and efficiently when fighting, so if a knight stabbed the samurai then the samurai would get injured and this would affect the samurai while he is fighting (the samurai would be fighting worse), and possible depending on how bad the wound is, it could kill the
Both the medieval European knights and the Japanese samurai used horses as means of transport into battle. They also both wore armour and used swords. European armour was typically all-metal and was made or either chain mail or plate metal. Whilst this made them more protected, it also restricted their movement. In contrast, the Japanese samurais donned armour which comprised of lacquered leather or metal plates with silk or metal bindings. This light weight armour was advantageous in that it allowed the samurai to be quick and more agile. The drawback to this armour though was that it provided much less protection.
helmet with rounded surfaces to deflect blows. A removable or hinged visor was fitted to make breathing easier, and padding was riveted for additional comfort” (Hilliam 20). By the middle of the fourteenth century, the chainmail was basically abandoned and plate armor was much more desired. It had “glancing surfaces” and it protected knights from arrows far better than the mail (Hilliam 32). But over time, knights seek more extensive armor and simultaneously, bigger horses were needed in order to carry the weight and bigger lances made from tree trunks (Hilliam 17).
Likewise, knights wore “complete suits of plate armor, constructed from metal...wore helmets, gloves, and shoes of steel...a knight’s armor could weigh 40 to 60 pounds.” (Document D) Both samurais and European knights were protected by a heavy armor out of metal in battle; it can be inferred that both Japan and Europe found importance in protecting their warriors looking from the stringency of armor and protection. The reason for protecting their warriors would be due to the myriad of battles feudal Japan and Europe would have had to carry out. To ensure success in battle, they would’ve made further technological advances such as protective armor, ensuring better performance when battling. By protecting the warriors using this effective armor, both Japan and Europe would’ve been able to attain more as a whole and advance as a civilization - a common achievement carried out as well. Despite the many differences between Japanese samurais and European knights, the similarities outweighed these differences due to the homologous elements in their position in hierarchy and the use of protective armor in battle, leading to the success in both Japan and
Without armored assaults in our modern military, I could guarantee that casualties would be a lot higher. Armor is one of the many support assets that the infantry pray for when they're in a tight spot. Seeing a two hundred ton can of pure power strikes fear into any opposing force; it is also the most sought after by the enemy because they know the capabilities and the value of main battle tanks (MBT). Sabine Sally, the grandmother to the lineage of all American tanks whether they are decommissioned or active all arrows will proudly point back to
In medieval Japan Samurais armor (According to Doc D by Terry Bennett) had an arm with no armor or very light armor, the reason for this was Samurai specialized in projectile warfare, and Samurai armor stayed the same for the rest of the Samurai area. In Europe the Knights used chainmail armor for quite some time, that is until crossbows and longbows became common, they had to change to metal armor that could be 60 pounds making it hard to get up if they were knocked down. Also the Knight's armor was made for shock warfare (According to Doc D from Art
In document D, written by the DBQ Project, it states “Not only was their entire body covered… even horses wore armor.” This shows that a knight could win in a battle because they were completely covered in protection. They wore helmets, gloves, and shoes made from steel. This was helpful because they wouldn’t get hurt as easily. Also, their swords were shorter, much easier to move in the air, and they had amazingly sharp sides that can do some serious damage. Another piece of evidence is from the same document, which says “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm… One disadvantage of samurai armor is that when it became wet, the silk cords absorbed water and became very heavy.” This makes it beyond difficult for the samurai to get around because most of the Earth is water, and Japan is an island. Since they didn’t wear armor on one part of their body, it is much easier for them to get hurt, especially since the knights’ swords were so advanced. The knights’ armor was better than the samurais’ for fighting in a lot of ways, but there are still other advantages that the knights might have
One of the ways that Samurais have an advantage against knights is due to their armor. In document D, written by Terry Bennett, it says “The helmet bowl (of a samurai) was made of 8-12 iron plates.” The samurai very much needed this because it was said and proven to be true that a knight’s sword could slice through one’s head and only be stopped by the teeth of a human. Another piece of evidence that supports my claim is in document D as well. The text states “Samurai did not wear armor on their right arm so they could easily draw their bow.” This was a major advantage to the samurai because they needed to have the ability to draw back their bow and aim at their target
Body armor has come a long way since the days of chain mail. As advanced technologies allow for lighter and more flexible protection, soldiers do not have to sacrifice range of motion or vision for safety. Body armor has also evolved according to the changes in ammunition. As ammunition becomes more lethal, body armor must follow suit in order to protect the combatant.
This allows the soldiers to apply pressure without having someone else to assist them. The tourniquets could only be used on wounds that occur on the arms or legs. Fibrin bandages are now used to decrease the loss of blood and the number of deaths. The treatment for a damaged limb at times, for some soldiers, was to amputate at an earlier time because it could later result in a good outcome. Anesthesia was created to prevent a lot of people from suffering pain during the operation. Military and civilian anesthesiology has connections in the treatment of trauma for critical care medicine. A vaccine was created to prevent Smallpox, it helps your body develop an immunity towards
These pieces of iron metal plates were their to help protect them from extremely dangerous weapons like swords and crossbows. In Document D, it stated that knights wore armour made out of tiny metal rings linked together. While the samurai had their armour filled all around with tiny iron scales that were tied together. This meant that both knights and samurai used metals in their armour to keep them protected during a battle. In Document C, it talks about how the knights and samurai trained at a young age to prepare for a battle when they get older. For example, a samurai started to train at about the age of 14, while a knight started as early as the age of four or five. These warriors were trained at a young age, so they would be able to improve on their skills
They also both wore helmets, but the creation of guns ended the use of this armor. Samurai armor was made with very great craftsmanship. Armor is made of iron with bits of silk inside to make it comfy, but if it got wet, it would be very heavy. The helmet of the samurai usually has 8-12 plates. They also don’t have any armor on the right arm so they could draw their bow quickly. Knight armor after the chainmail became very different. They made the armor out of plate metal. This covered the whole body. Horses wore armor too! According to Document D, “Even horses wore armor. A knight’s armor could weigh 40-60 pounds.” The weight and flexibility of the armor made it very hard to move, so if a knight fell off their horse, it would be hard to get away from enemies. Both knight and samurai have codes of conducts. These codes are similar because they are thind like pledging their loyalty to their master and devoting himself to his duty. The samurai code is called Bushido and it is based on striving to fulfill The Way, and like it says
Armor started out being leather and advanced to chain mail throughout the middle ages.In the Middle Ages, Knights’ armor was different. In the beginning of the Middle Ages, they wore leather armor (Freudenrich). Leather cost a lot, but was easily crafted using heated water or oil (Freudenrich). Leather is good at stopping swords but is susceptible to thrusts and arrows (Freudenrich). In the Middle Ages, chain mail was popular, but was borrowed from the Romans (Freudenrich). Chain mail was mostly small, interlocked steel rings. The ends of the rings could be close together (butted mail) or could have a metal rivet (riveted mail) (Freudenrich). Chain mail was pretty easy to make, it cost less than other forms of armor and
Medieval Shields were developed to protect, a knight or soldier from the direct blows from the weapons of their enemies. Shields used during the Middle Ages were also used as heavy weapons. The use of the shield as an actual weapon was practised by knights at the Pell/target practice. Pell training had to have hours of practice to increase skill.
Humans throughout recorded history have used various types of materials as a body armor to protect themselves from injury in combat and other dangerous situations. The first protective clothing and shields were made from animal skins. Eventually, metal was also used as body armor, what we now refer to as the suit of armor associated with the knights of Middle Ages. (“Bellis,Marry”). During the middle ages, an Italian named Filippo Negroli was known to be knowledgable in fashioning steel. His skills were commissioned by the Duke of Ubino. Together, they have marked the production of the very first kinds of bulletproof clothing. However, the vest’s, heaviness and restriction to movements made their especially designed body armor became a problem rather than an advantage during the war. Together with the minds of other people who