What Is Predictive Technology In Law Enforcement

According to Rachel Boba, “Crime analysis is a law enforcement function that involves systematic analysis for identifying and analyzing patterns and trends in crime and disorder” (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime analysis).The information on these patterns can assist law enforcement agencies in the deployment of resources in a more effective manner; it can also help detectives to identify and catch suspects. Crime analysis also plays a role in improvising solutions to crime problems, and developing crime prevention strategies. There are various types of technology that is used in crime analysis. Crime analysis relies heavily on computer technology, and over the past fifteen years there has been a significant improvement in computer hardware and

In the end, getting a winning edge on the crime scene can make a safer America, but insufficient results will keep the system from taking off. The idea of catching a criminal before an atrocity occurs is appealing to the everyday people of America. But in the same way a product cannot impact people without proof of concept, the precognitive system will not win over our nation until its usefulness is in action. After all, technology is driving America, and the use of a precognitive system is the first step in the criminal

In 1994, the New York City Police Department adopted a law enforcement crime fighting strategy known as COMPSTAT (COMPuter STATistics). COMPSTAT uses Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to map the locations of where crimes occur, identify “ hotspots”, and map problem areas. COMPSTAT has amassed a wealth of historical crime data. Mathematicians have designed and developed algorithms that run against the historical data to predict future crimes for police departments. This is known as predictive policing. Predictive policing has led to a drop in burglaries, automobile thefts, and other crimes in some cities.

There are many positives that come with the technology and use of predictive policing. Police are preventing many crimes. The United

The current state of overall safety within the US is undeniably at, what appears to be, an all time low. The rate of crime is a prominent factor that works to decrease the overall safety within the country. With a reduction of these crime rates, the US can be made safer for the general public. New tools--such as laws and apps--must be implemented in order to reduce crime rates.

Across the country, many police forces have begun implementing programs like the Domain Awareness System, a program designed in 2012 by the New York Police Department (NYPD) and Microsoft (Karoliszyn 338). “The Domain Awareness System retrieves, analyzes, and instantly displays information from more than 3,000 surveillance cameras, 911 calls, number-plate readers, and other sources”, Karoliszyn explains (338). Arguably, Karoliszyn states that with programs like the Domain Awareness System in place, it is possible for police units to prevent crime before they ever happen (338). Despite the provided evidence, people should answer the more concerning questions before putting their faith in these crime-predicting

From citizens capturing incidents of police brutality on their smartphones to police departments using surveillance drones, technology is changing our relationship to the law. Preventive policing is the newest aspect of law enforcement that acts as a deterrent rather than a reaction.

Using reports involving lesser crimes gathered from the immediate and surrounding coverage areas, the agency forecasts the increase in short-term illegal activity and then intervenes by increasing law enforcement presence in the predicted high-risk areas. Kansas City Police Department uses predictive policing software to monitor and analyze criminal organizations, social media activity, and drug consumption. Through an initiative called the Kansas City No Violence Alliance (KC NoVA

With the ever evolving threats that we face from both domestic and foreign terrorist groups, law enforcement agencies have been forced to adapt to meet these new challenges. By incorporating guidance provided by the federal government, police agencies have made a greater effort to solidify their relationship with the citizens of their respective communities. This relationship seeks to promote two-way communication and the sharing of information vital to the protection of our communities. Formally titled Intelligence Led Policing (ILP), this ideology “provides strategic integration of intelligence into the overall mission of the organization” “(Baker, 2005, p. 41), and seeks to build upon the interrelationship of intelligence gathering and community policing. The overall success of this

According to a white paper conducted by the Intelligence Committee of the Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association (AFCEA), both law enforcement and intelligence organizations recognize the need to collaborate, share, and exchange information. However, the events leading up to 9/11 document how the legal and artificial boundaries between them created a serious impediment to protecting the country. First this paper will discuss some of the reasoning and initiatives behind the development of information sharing between the Intelligence Community (IC) and law enforcement agencies; and this paper will also discuss the similarities and difference between Title 50 United States Code (U.S.C.) intelligence activities to law enforcement information gathering/sharing. Apparently, the consensus is that, the IC and the law enforcement agencies need to share more information, that include operational strategies and tactics—especially those focused on transnational issues such as terrorism, drugs, counterintelligence, and weapons of mass destruction—needed to be better integrated.

Individuals believe that those in law enforcement abuse technology in their line of work such as in the courtroom or when they are patrolling the streets, also many of these individuals have convinced themselves and others that the government has each person under constant surveillance, collecting the data and stockpiling this collected data over CCTV for other to see. This brings up two questions that will be answered in this paper. Are police and other members of law enforcement using this technology correctly? How is data collected and stored by different agencies? Police have technology in their possession that is used to keep us safer each and every day. Many people see this as a danger as it could give police too much power, but truthfully

Most importantly two softwares (PredPol and HunchLab) are used to detect the most likelihood of crimes in any area. Contrary to the the satisfactory reviews by police, predictive policing is anti-democratic enhancing the sphere of power controlling conducts to conform to the popular state narrative.

Predictive policing is already showing results in places like Santa Cruz, California. As I mentioned in my first paragraph, what they do is use historical crime data from the past 10-20 years to give officers the best places to find and prevent crime before it happens. The program has resulted in a 27% decrease in robberies and an 11% decrease in burglaries in the first years of trying predictive policing.

Historically, technological innovation has served as the substance for intense changes in the organization of police work and has presented both opportunities and challenges to police and other criminal justice practitioners, according to Janet Chan, a social scientist who has studied how information technology affects the way police do their jobs.1 Noting that .information is the stock-in- trade of policing,. Chan has identified three general imperatives driving law enforcement’s evening investment in information technology. Using information technology in policing has add that more efficiency to the police department. Comparing the old-fashioned way of patrolling the streets to combat crime to then use them of using technology to predict the crime area and patrolling in advance deters crimes from happening. There are many advantages associated with using information technology in policing. Comparative analysis shows that using information technology (IT) to combat crime has save lot of resources and time in the police department. There are a number of other advantages that can be associated with the use of information technology in the police department.

Intelligence collection and apprehension of criminals have occurred for many years; however, with the exception of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, these actions were performed by different organizations. Nonetheless, roles and responsibilities have changed since the attacks on September 11, 2001. Intelligence-led policing and the National Criminal Intelligence Sharing program were incorporated, and fusion centers were established to help gather intelligence from different levels of the government. Although law enforcement at the local, state, and tribal levels aid in intelligence collection, it is important to ensure that intelligence gathered to protect national security and law enforcement