When Samantha arrived on the unit, the first impression was that the client was a rich, privileged spoiled child in a 40-year-old body. The client was admitted post an overdose and driving into oncoming traffic. She was involuntary committed by law enforcement when cut wrists were also noted. The client was arrogant and very mean towards staff and peers. In the early part of the assessment, the client continued to be blunted, angry, and uncooperative. When the client was asked about allowed collateral calls about discharge planning, the client burst into tears. Totally changed the client begged for the mother not to be contacted. The client stated there was not a good relationship and in fact the mother was mentally ill also. The …show more content…
Counselor’s often see clients at their worst, while the client is trying to hang onto the last bit of dignity that is possessed. Often counselors base their perception based on learned discrimination (). Most counselors denied being biased as do students. Unfortunately, there is not a person that doesn’t have a bias. Counselors are human and no different from the general joe in looking at a way a person is dressed or where their address is that a person is a certain way (Ahmed et.al, 2011). Clients can be lumped into a certain group based on race, sexuality, demographics and illness. It is an unfair assumption that all Bipolar patients or alcoholics are alike or more that matter are always Bipolar and an alcoholic. The counselor is allowing only the partial view of the patient to form an opinion(Wilshie,2005). This happens when we allow our perception to diagnose and treat the person without knowing the whole story. All of it built on assumptions, which always an improper route to travel. The consequences of such actions by the counselor that client does not return or becomes worse to the bias. It can actually harm the client.
The Code of Ethics of most organizations is to do no harm. The counselor should go into the meeting with an open mind and thoughts(ACA,2014). The counselor must consider cultural background in developing a rapport with a client. It is the counselor’s job to make the client feel at ease. If the counselor is not at ease, neither will the client be at ease. Biases can be formed based on
In an effort to become a culturally aware counselor, Stephanie will want to become aware of her own assumptions, values, and bias (Sue & Sue, 2013). Counselors who have an awareness of this, are able to compare their world view with that of their client's and see how they can bridge the gap of understanding. Counselors should actively try to understand their clients worldview by asking questions about their clients cultural background, hopes, fears, and aspirations(2013), thus , gaining a better understanding of the client and who they are,enabling them to work with various clients despite the differences in backgrounds, race, gender, or culture.
As individuals, we are diverse based on the background, experience, ability, race, language, etc. which impact the lens through which we view others and ourselves. As diverse individual, we may belong to dominant or non- dominant groups. Thus, either we have power and privilege or we experience discrimination and oppression. Further, we are shelled with diversity, ethnicity, and multiculturalism issues. Counselors have some ethical primary responsibilities to respect the dignity and promote the welfare of the client (A.1.a), “honoring diversity and embracing a multicultural approach in support of the worth, dignity” and “promoting social justice” (Herlihy & Corey, 2014, p. 3)
The officer does not need to obtain a warrant in order to make an arrest. However, the officer is required to investigate what has happened. The officer at this moment he has reasonable suspicion, in other words there may have been a crime committed and the person the officer stops believes he or she may have committed that crime. With this we have the ability to detain and investigate. Now if the suspect takes off running and the police officer observes the suspect run into a house and shut the door. We still do not need to a search warrant or permission to enter. The police officer already has the knowledge that a robbery has taken place and the victim identified the suspect. The suspect has now fled. So there is knowledge he committed a
Psychological profiling is defined as a process of linking an offender’s actions at the crime scene to their most likely characteristics to help police investigators narrow down and prioritize a pool of most likely suspects (Psychological Profiling, n.d.). The psychological profiling of offenders has three goals; to provide the criminal justice system with a social and psychological assessment of the offender, to provide the criminal justice system with a psychological evaluation of belongings found in the possession of the offender, and to provide interviewing suggestions and strategies (Holmes & Holmes, 2009). Profiling of suspects can be tracked as far back to the 1880’s. However, it wasn’t until the twentieth century that forensic psychology
Friends of Family members. “counselors are prohibited from engaging in counseling relationship with friends or family members with whom they have an inability to remain objective” (ACA Code of Ethics, 2014. p.5). I will not be objective if I would continue having sessions with her my friendship will distract my objectivity towards my client. The second ethical issue that I encounter was in section B.2.a Serious and foreseeable Harm and Legal Requirements. “keep information confidential does not apply when clients and others are identified from serious or foreseeable harm, legal requirements demand that information must be reveled” (ACA Code of Ethics, 2014. p.7). as in my session with the client it came to my knowledge that her special needs son was talking of killing himself if something happened to her, so my responsibility was to make sure her son was in safety and with the necessary help to prevent any damage or tragedy in the family. And the third ethical issue that I encounter was the Section B.1.a. Multicultural/ Diversity Considerations. As a Newsome and Gladding mention in their book “the most constructive approach to multicultural counseling is one that merges etic an emic perspective by focusing on both universal and specifics cultural
CM was out on vacation for the period of 8/15/2015 to 8/24/2015. On 9/1/2015, CM met with the client to complete Bi-Weekly ILP Review. She was cooperative and appropriate in the meeting. The client described her mood as “bewildered.” Her affect was in appropriate. She doesn’t appear to be in distress. CM inquires how the client has been doing since the last Bi-Weekly ILP Review. Client replies “ not good”. She mentions she being harassed by a few clients in the shelter. CM asked the client to describe the harassment client states those clients single her out and called her names. CM reported the allegation to LG/L. Rivera. Ms. Rivera a few minutes later came back to the social service office and stated she address the situation and
A boundary infraction occurs when the counselor crosses the line of civility and principle and misuses his/her influence to exploit the client for the counselor’s own gain. Boundary breaches conventionally involve exploitive business or sexual relationships. However, boundary crossings are often part of well-constructed treatment plans and, as such, they can increment therapeutic efficacy. “This is why the professional must possess the competence to master his/her task. Continually practicing ethical behavior and accountability because he/she is accountable to the client as well as to the public” (A.5.c. Code of Ethics) state “Counselor-client nonprofessional relationships should be avoided, except when the interaction is potentially beneficial to the client.” (ACA, 2015).
The helpful ethical codes and standards are “Developmental and Cultural Sensitivity” (A.2.c.), “Personal Values” (A.4.b.), Multicultural/Diversity Considerations” (B.1.a.), “Boundaries of Competence” (C.2.a.), and “Multicultural Issues/Diversity in Assessment” (E.8.). Code A.2.c will ensure that counselors are aware of their values and will aim to be culturally sensitive to the clients they counsel. Code A.4.b will confirm that the professionals are not imposing their worldviews on the client and the client’s spiritual perspective is being respected. Code C.2.a will verify that the professionals have obtained the credentials and experience to counsel this population. Lastly, code E.8 will ensure that the counselors are selecting the appropriate
First and fore more the counselor should protect the student and practice within the boundaries of your competencies. In other words only offer services that you are competent at. If you cannot assist the student refer them to someone who can offer them the services they need. On page 82 Brown says, “Doing no harm requires competence in the use of counseling techniques, coaching strategies, and assessment devices. It also requires counselors to provide up-to-date, accurate information about educational and occupational options. Furthermore, doing no harm requires that counselors develop knowledge of the cultural backgrounds and worldviews of their clients and an understanding of the cultural
The American Counseling Association Ethical Standards are a structure for making decisions. Autonomy refers to independence and self-determination. This code states that counselors must give their clients the liberty to select their own conclusions, make their own choices and regulate their own lives. Nonmaleficence means do no harm. Counselors must make sure their activities do not injure their clients. Beneficence means to endorse good mental health and wellbeing. Justice is the groundwork of the promise of fairness in professional interactions. Justice comprises of factors such as distribution of time and resources, formations of charges, and admission to counseling services. Fidelity means counselors make truthful
Furthermore, Herilhy & Corey (2015) suggested that therapists and counselors should govern client-relationship on principles based upon The American Counseling Association (ACA). Practitioners should avoid to cause and do harm to clients. Nonmaleficence is a fundamental principle that relates to do no harm. In the ACA Code of Ethics A.4.b. refers to personal values counselors are aware of their own values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors and avoid imposing values that are inconsistent with counseling goals (Herlihy &Corey 2015). Herlihy and Corey (2015) go on to say that counselors need to respect the diversity of clients, trainees, and research participants.
If we do not explore our feelings and weaknesses, we risk falling and causing harm to our selves and our clients as well. Accountability to ourselves and our supervisors are essential in helping us to maintain integrity in our relationships. We must also be aware of the consequences of our actions, if we act on our impulses. We must know the codes of ethics we must adhere to as counselors. Our codes of ethics urge us to protect the client above all else, even if it means protecting them from ourselves. If we are aware of and adhere to the codes of ethics as well as the moral compass found in our Bibles, we will be effective counselors.
As a professional counselor, what should one do in when personal values conflict with those of the client? Furthermore, what happens when core beliefs are in stark contradiction between counselor and client? According to the American Counseling Association (ACA), a professional counselor must practice within the bounds of the ACA Code of Ethics, which provides the framework for upholding the ethical commitment of professional counselors and depicts the core professional values and principles of the counseling profession. One of the core values set forth by the ACA is to practice in a “competent and ethical manner” (ACA, 2014). While upholding this value, a professional counselor must simultaneously uphold the principle of “nonmaleficence by avoiding actions that cause harm” to the client (ACA, 2014). The principle of nonmaleficence encompasses the notion that the counselor is aware of their own personal beliefs so not as to impose their beliefs onto the client, especially when the beliefs could discriminate and cause harm to the client. Therefore, counselors must recognize individual personal values that play a significant part in the ethical decision making process, as counseling must be carried out in a manner that promotes respect for client beliefs and does not cause harm.
Counselor should be open and honest because it helps the clients to comfortable with speaking about their current situation. Demonstrating the respect for cultural differences makes client more appreciative of the counselor because knowing the diversity within cultures would be beneficial in knowing the right services the client would need. Children should be understand, the importance of counseling because it’s helps them to analyze why they’re in counseling in the first place. One goal of counseling children is making sure the child is knowledgeable about their culture because it is important for them to know the expectation of what their cultures is all about.
When a series of major bombings rocked the city of New York in the 1950s, the police were at a loss of who the potential bomber could be. At wits end, they decided to go an atypical route and hire psychiatrist James Brussel for the case. According to Louis Schlesinger, from simply looking at the crime scenes and other evidence that the police had gathered, Brussel was able to create an extremely detailed profile. Brussel said to, “Look for a heavy man. Middle age. Foreign born. Roman Catholic. Single. Lives with a brother or sister. When you find him, chances are he’ll be wearing a double-breasted suit. Buttoned.” (74) Consequently, police narrowed their search to fit this profile, and were astounded that when they found a man, George Metesky, who fit this profile down to a T, even having a buttoned double breasted suit. Moreover, this caused the FBI to gain an interest in this process and became what is now known as psychological profiling. (Schlesinger 75)