According to the manufacturer, the type of SiC particles is green hexagonal, which means they are of the type α-SiC. Therefore, I think we need to look at the properties for this type of SiC only. Before this, for choosing the value of CTE for SiC, I used the room temperature values declared on Table 3 of the 1997 publication by R.G. Munro, which is attached to this message. For room temperature the value 1.1 and for 500°C the value 4.4 is given. I noticed that for all other experimental CTEs as well as theoretical assumptions, I am using CTE values that are averaged between room temperature and elevated temperatures. Therefore, it makes sense to me to average these two values and use the number 2.75 for CTE of this type of SiC particles. …show more content…
Do you think you possess any information that we can assimilate to our work? Is that plot referring to the same matrix which is described in this draft? If so, I would appreciate if you provide that plot and its relevant raw data to me.
P.S.: For your further information, in the present work, CS stands for NLI-122, CZ for NLI-110, and CSZ for NLI-123.
I absolutely agree with you that this idea could make our work more powerful. Not only because it can provide an extra control, also because the impact of the severity of the thermal shock response of (comparable) refractories has not been well explored in the literature, to my best knowledge. I proposed the same idea as a research topic in the past, however, our time and resources have always been limited, and based on the available resources it was decided to explore other aspects of the thermal shock phenomena. This experimental research could be generally designed in three ways:
1- Apply one temperature profile to multiple types of refractory and characterize the response of the refractories.
2- Apply multiple temperature profiles to one type of refractory and characterize the impact of the temperature profile.
3- Apply multiple temperature profiles on multiple types of refractory and characterize the response of the refractories as well as the impact of the temperature profile.
For the present research we chose the
The dependent variable in the experiment was the temperature and energy absorbed by the water.
Temperature is known as one of the factors that affect the solubility of a gas in its solvent. Because the enthalpy of solution for gases dissolved in waters is usually
The aim of the experiment will be to investigate how varying water temperatures influence the time of a chemical reaction, in this case being, a combination of Sodium Thiosulfate and Hydrochloric Acid.
The control experiment for this investigation will be the experimental setup of 5 trials using 5oC as the temperature. All the steps in the method will be followed.
The first part of this lab’s objective was to find the calorimeter constant using DI water. We accomplished this by first checking the temperature and then adding 20 mL of cold DI water into our calorimeter. Next we collected 20 more mL of DI water in a 50 mL beaker and placed it onto a burner in order to heat it. We removed the beaker once the temperature of the water reached 60º celsius. After we removed the water, we poured it into the calorimeter with the cold water and took the temperature. The temperature ended up being 37º celsius. From this information we were able to calculate for qhot, qcold, qcal and Ccal. To be as accurate as possible we conducted this same test three more times and used the averages from all Ccal calculations as the final Ccal.
5) Graph the equation you wrote in step four superimposed over the original data. Comment on how well or how
4. Increase the resistance (# green dots). What affect does this have on temperature? WHY?
Procedure: My partner and I measured the temperature of NaCIO (bleach) and Na2S2O3 to prevent any misleading data. We then measured 250mL of each solution and poured 5.0mL of NaCIO and 45.0mL of Na2S2O3 in a styrofoam cup. As my partner measured the solution for the other trials, I stirred the mixture while checking the temperature until it reached its optimal level. After each trial, we recorded the temperature on our data table. We repeated the process until
This experiment was conducted to determine if the light of a glow stick can be affected by the temperature of water. In this the researcher will try to find what temperature of water makes a glow stick glow brighter and how long it will stay lit. By proceeding in the experiment, the data collected proved the hypothesis to be correct. Warmer water caused the glow stick to glow brighter than it had before. On the other hand, the beaker with colder water made the stick stay lit longer and the room temperature water didn’t affect the glow stick as much.
4. Remelt the contents of the tube and add the counterpart component based on the given schedule. Ask the demonstrator to adjust the cooling water between mixtures. During the experiment, record and plot the data obtained for all mixtures listed. The experiments are stopped as follows:
We think the tests we did went smoothly and we had no problems, except for the fact that we broke one of the test tubes from school. After all it was under a flames for majority of the experiment, the thermometer slipped 1 cm from the bottom of the test tube and shattered a hole through the bottom of it. Threw our experiment we had to keep our variables the same by even having the test tube with water at the exact same height every time above the burning flame . We also kept the same amount of gel fluid the same in every test that is why it was surprising to us that the gel by itself would heat the tube with water in it to higher temperature. We think this is because the gel added with the caramelized fizzy drink had to use a lot more energy to start the reaction which was boiling the excess fizzy drink to create a warm flame that could not last as long because it was using the gel to create energy.
Procedure: A beaker was filled up with water to about 90% of the beaker’s capacity was placed on a hot plate and was continuously heated throughout the entire experiment. 90 mL of potassium iodate and sodium bicarbonate were combined into a large beaker. The initial temperature of each solution was recorded.
We will be using 6 different fuels to heat up 100ml of water, and find out the changes of the temperature. We will measure the temperatures of the water before and after the experiment. We will burn heat the water for exactly 2 minutes, and check the changes in temperature. The change in temperature will allow us to work out the energy given off the fuel by using this formula:
After examining the results for the other supplier samples, it was shown that Advance Wire’s sample was most suitable for the extremely high temperatures.
The temperature-time plot gotten by applying a lumped-parameter analysis (Equation 6) to the Aluminum cylinder was compared to the plot obtained from the thermocouple located closest to center of the cylinder. This thermocouple is chosen for comparison because it is located farthest from the heating source and will have a temperature history that differs most from an ideal lumped system. With this thermocouple, we should therefore obtain the maximum error associated with applying a