Herman Melville, the author of “Bartleby, the Scrivener: A story of Wall Street” and few other notable works such as Moby Dick, grew up in the nineteenth century encircled by the New York area. By the time Melville started writing his short story on Bartleby, Wall Street was already a big financial district and his father had lost along with many others in the stock market. This novella was one that was very personal for Melville. Melville wrote his story to go against the crowd with his writing whose style was not very common. One can theorize that Herman Melville uses his short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener” to display isolation/alienation of people in the workplace that could have been evident in the nineteenth century. We see through the …show more content…
We also see walls/doors as a symbol that is ensuring the isolation of the characters. Each character will be analyzed through the text first, and then I will analyze using other critics’ perspective on the issue.
The principal character I want to analyze on alienation is Bartleby. Bartleby is viewed as an enigma by the lawyer as he states “But I waive the biographies of all other scriveners for a few passages in the life of Bartleby, who was a scrivener of the strangest I ever saw or heard of” (Melville). The first we see of Bartleby, and the narrator already has plans to isolate him from the rest of the office: “I resolved to assign Bartleby a corner by the folding-doors, but on my side of them” (Melville). We can already see that the lawyer did not want his “bad scriveners” corrupting his newcomer. As we read further into the text we learn that his desk was
…show more content…
The lawyer himself says his goal was to remove the sight of him, but not the employment: “I procured a high green folding screen, which might entirely isolate Bartleby from my sight, though not remove him from my voice” (Melville). The narrator also makes Bartleby out be some sort of loner who does not like company. We are told scriveners usually work in pairs: “Where there are two or more scriveners in an office, they assist each other in this examination, one reading from the copy, the other holding the original” (Melville), but Bartleby is an exception to this normalcy “I cannot credit that the mettlesome poet Byron would have contentedly sat down with Bartleby to examine a law document” (Melville). We see that the narrator makes Bartleby a hard to work with person in this statement thus isolating himself from the rest of his colleagues. He is also dehumanized in his way of work, where he worked methodically, but there was no change in the way he worked. The lawyer describes him as an emotionless robot-like being: “I should have
The narrator of the story becomes shocked when he discovers that Bartleby, who only feeds on ginger nuts, has never left the office. This is actually the first time that the narrator experiences the spiritual power that Bartleby possesses. The narrator is so much business oriented that he only looks at the world in terms of profits. However, when he encounters this aspect of the spirit of Bartleby, his attitude towards life changes. He begins appreciating the fact that Bartleby deserves better treatment, not in the capitalist way. The narrator even sees what is a right, just as an asset, but this perception is later changed by Bartleby’s spirit: “What earthly right have you to stay here? Do you pay any rent? Do you pay my taxes? Or is this property yours?” (Melville, 41).
“Bartleby, the Scrivener” by Herman Melville, is a story about the quiet struggle of the common man. Refusing to bow to the demands of his employer, Bartleby represents a challenge to the materialistic ideology by refusing to comply with simple requests made by his employer. The story begins with the employer having trouble finding good employees. This is until the employer hires Bartleby. At first, Bartleby works hard and does his job so well that everyone has a hard time imagining what it would be like without him. After three days, Bartleby is asked by his boss to examine a legal paper. He replies with “I would prefer not to”. The story ends with Bartleby being discovered occupying the office at weekends and being taken into custody for
In the narrator’s office, Bartleby is faced with being holed up by his employer. The narrator tells us “I resolved to assign Bartleby a corner by the folding-doors, but on my side of them… I placed his desk close up to a small side window in that part of the room, a window which originally had afforded a lateral view of certain grimy backyards and bricks, but which owing to subsequent erections, commanded no present view at all, though it gave some light… Still to further satisfactory arrangement, I procured a high green folding screen, which might entirely isolate Bartleby from my sight…” (Melville, 301). He has essentially cut Bartleby off from any forms of communication by this set-up, alienating him from the other workers in the office and the narrator as well. We see Bartleby deteriorate through his time in the office, starting off as a hard worker, to denying to do certain parts of his job, and finally, to completely cutting himself off and not doing any work, much to the chagrin of the narrator and the others. The work itself could also be compared to that of what he did in the Dead Letter Office, copying dead letters day in and day out for the law. There is no real destination for what he does, the works he copies will end up gathering
Herman Melville’s short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener” reveals different themes such as isolation and human morality test. In the story, the narrator runs a law firm and has a new Scrivener [Bartleby] who the narrator describes as“ the strangest I ever saw or heard of” (661). For the first few days, Bartleby is seen to be working fine, however, one day Bartleby just responds with “I would prefer not to” when anyone assigns a task to Bartleby (674). The real problems start to arise when Bartleby sleeps and eats at the office while denying to work or leave. The narrator illustrates the two main themes of human morals and isolation throughout the story with the use of biblical references to Bartleby as a leper and shows symbolism of the
After reading “Bartleby, The Scrivener” and watching the movie, the immediate thing you catch is the setting. The setting between the book and the movie are completely different. “Bartleby is a clerk in a Wall Street law firm. He is a quiet, respectable, competent scribe who, at first, seems to be a model employee. He is more productive than the other clerks. He works hard. He seldom takes breaks. But there is something odd about him.” (Lantos). This explains a good portion of who Bartleby is in the book, that he is a diligent and steadfast worker. The movie also explains that Bartleby is a great
The lawyer portrays his self-interest when he moves his office and abandons Bartleby, due to his negative affect on the business. Because Bartleby continues to annoyingly dawdle around the old office, the lawyer attempts to rid the building of Bartleby, for the lawyer is "fearful of being exposed" (1201) and criticized by the public. Clearly, the lawyer speaks to Bartleby in hopes of relieving himself from any
Herman Melville’s, “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” tells the tale of Bartleby, the new scrivener at a lawyer’s office on Wall-Street. In an office of industrious, distressed workers who endlessly perform mundane tasks due to the orders of the lawyer, Bartleby forms a mystifying exception. Bartleby baffles his boss and colleagues by responding to requests with his famous line, “I would prefer not to.” His response demonstrates an unwillingness to work and a willingness to do what he truly desires, which is extremely unusual to both his colleagues and their society and creates a massive social divide between them. Due to the abandonment of those around him resulting from their growing frustration with his inactivity, Bartleby ultimately faces a swift
“Since he will not quit me, I must quit him. Ah Bartleby, Ah Humanity.” (Melville 131) This is the key to Bartleby, for it indicates that he stands as a symbol for humanity. This in turn functions as a commentary on society and the working world, for Bartleby is a seemingly homeless, mentally scrivener who gives up on the prospect of living life, finally withdrawing himself from society. However, by doing so Bartleby is attempting to exercise his freewill, for he would “prefer not to” work. His relationship to the narrator (the Lawyer) and the normal progression of life. However, this
In the short story “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” which was written by Herman Melville, the character named Bartleby is a very odd, yet interesting individual. In the story, Bartleby is introduced when he responds to a job opening at the narrator’s office. Although there is no background information given about him, it becomes very apparent that he will be the antagonist in this story. Unlike the usual image put on the antagonist, Bartleby causes conflict with a very quiet and calm temperament. This character’s attitude, along with the fact that he is a flat and static character, makes him a very unique antagonist, and this fact is shown through the way other characters approach and deal with his conflict.
Recently, I have learned that urban settings creates an opportunity for intimacy with one another; however, in “Bartleby, the Scrivener” written by Herman Melville, that was not the case. He describes the nature of the world of work and business through concrete description of the scenery. The story is set on Wall Street in New York City which had become the core of American business life during the 1850s. The setting is a critical component of Bartleby, because it emphasize the author’s concern about the effects that an environment has on American society. Bartleby’s environment separated him from nature and the people around him. To illustrate Bartleby’s detachment from society, he worked in “a corner by the folding-doors” behind a screen and has a window that “commanded at present no view at all” (1489). A creation of emptiness in the business life was molded. The setting indicates a sense of isolation and failure to connect; however, it establishes the relation between the walling out of Bartleby from his boss, passive
Lastly, the last employee The Lawyer describes is Bartleby. According to the Lawyer, Bartle is, “one of those beings of whom nothing is ascertainable, except from the original sources, and in his case those are very small” (Melville 1). To him, Bartleby is the most interesting scriveners of all time. Bartleby joins the office after getting hired when he saw an ad placed by the Lawyer, which at that time needed extra help in his office. In the
The Lawyer, however, does not seem entirely content with his corporate lifestyle. There are moments in the story in which the Lawyer acknowledges his own sense of alienation and acts in genuinely kind manner such as when he gives Nippers his old coat because the copyist himself was too poor to buy another. Or, for example, after an office accomplishment, the Lawyer feels that he is “almost sorry for his brilliant success” (Melville 19). The Lawyer’s occasional thoughtfulness suggests that he is not an absolute wretched person, especially when one considers his awareness of the office as a dehumanizing environment. In reality, it would seem the Lawyer’s aforementioned years in the corporate system have impacted him greatly, but a shred of humanity remains. He is afterall, a “rather elderly man” opposed to just an elderly man; the Lawyer still has time to live a authentic lifestyle should he choose to do so. At precisely this point in the Lawyer’s life, and by no coincidence,
The two other scriveners in the office, Turkey and Nippers, only did a combined one full days work between the two of them. Turkeys drinking problem and Nippers not being a morning person caused lack of production between the two workers. Turkey could work fine in the morning and turned out good copies, while Nippers was incapable of working in the morning and getting nothing done. In the afternoon, Turkey would return from lunch drunk and not being able to complete any tasks without blotting paper and Nippers was the productive one. “But the blots, Turkey,” intimated I. “True; but, with submission, sir, behold these hairs! I am getting old. Surely, sir, a blot or tow of a warm afternoon is not got be severely urged against grey hairs.” (135) Bartleby recognizes this lack of authority and once asked by his boss to look over some of his work Bartleby says, “I would prefer not to” and refuses to look over his work despite his bosses wishes. Any normal boss might give a stern warning and make the employee complete the task at hand. On the other hand, Bartleby’s boss simply blew off the matter and summoned Nippers from the other room to look over Bartleby’s work. This event gave Bartleby the green light to believing he can do what he wants in the office and no discipline will be
Bartleby, because he can no longer stand the sight of him he has the movers leave
To start off let’s discuss the Lawyer from Bartleby, the relationship the Lawyer shared with his subordinates could be identified as a Marx capitalist alienation. As theorized by Marx, alienation in the workplace is a fourfold process that involves the object being produced, the process of production, the employee, and his coworkers (Bancroft). For Bartleby, his products were copies he made for the Lawyer, and the process was the copying he did. From what I