Case Study
What is leadership? Leadership stems from social influence, not authority or power, Leadership requires others, and that implies they don’t need to be “direct reports”, (Kruse, 2013). Some leaders are great leaders, they care about the organizations they work for, they also care about the people they manage and their future. Other leaders are just put in positions or situations that they are simply not qualified for. There is also one dangerous type of leaders called dysfunctional leaders. Dysfunctional leaders can be gifted with charm and determination, but when something goes wrong, their self-confident behavior can rapidly spiral out of control (Kakabadse, 2013).
Dysfunctional leadership has many types. One of the types is the paranoid leader. Paranoid leaders are suspicious; they are paranoid of people that are better, smarter and sharper than them. They are always afraid that someone is going to steal their position or the spotlight from them. They blow up for the smallest reasons like if someone slightly embarrasses them in front of others. Paranoid leaders imagine that the entire universe revolves around plans designed to do them harm (Pinsker, 1997).
In this case study, I will provide an example of a paranoid leader that I have worked with in the past. It is clear that the leader had paranoia issues. That individual started his role while the organization was undergoing a huge restructuring which caused his paranoia to become very apparent. His fear
A toxic leader can be defined as leader motivated by egocentrism, self-interest and show no concern for those below him, and his actions negatively affect the organizational climate. They exalt themselves in turf protection, fighting and controlling their followers instead of uplifting them. Toxic leaders are very destructive and they only focus on short term accomplishments and they destroy their followers to achieve those objectives. Their decisions are made hasty and they change their decisions without any justified rationale. Mostly, they lazy around only to make hasty decisions when it is too late and the crisis is already in place. Such decisions have no time to be thought over and therefore, they are continuously changed throughout implementation so as to work effectively and may even be altered completely thereby making the whole process messy (Seeger, 2005).
Leadership, which is defined as “…The action of leading a group of people or an organization” is used in many different ways. Most people think being a leader is mostly about being the boss, having people work under you and just becoming successful, but it boils down to more than that. Leaders are those individuals that actually utilize their many abilities in leadership and administration to help make a better change for themselves, the people around them and the goal that needs to be achieved. Leadership is not an expertise that can essentially be grabbed from a book or article based on leadership but instead it is one of those initiative abilities that are increased through experience and understanding those real life situations.
Leadership is a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others, towards the achievement of a goal. The article “Leadership That Gets Results” by Daniel Goleman is an article that helps readers understand that there is not only one way of becoming a successful leader. Research indicates that leaders with best results do not rely on only one leadership style. Goleman, describes leaderships styles as array of clubs in a golf pro’s bag. Over the course of the game, the pro picks clubs based on the demands of the shot. Thinking is involved during the selection, but usually it is automatic. The pro is aware of the challenge ahead, quickly utilizes the right tool, and puts it to work. It has also been found that emotional intelligence
Leadership refers to the act of leading a considerable number of people within an establishment or the capacity to do this. Leadership has to do with coming up with a vision that is crystal clear and the ability to spreads that idea out in a manner that makes individuals, given the information, knowledge, and methods to understand, willing to follow. Subsequently, balancing and coordinating the conflicting interests of all stakeholders and members. It is typical for any good leader to step up in the event of a contingency, with the potential to imagine and act creatively in situations that prove to be difficult. Different from management, leadership can never be taught, in as much as it may be learned and bettered employing mentoring and coaching (Servant Leadership Based on Robert Greenleaf’s Writings, 2010).
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Leadership is critical and it refers to the process of influencing followers towards achieving the groups’ goals. Toxic leadership refers to the leadership offered by leaders who abuse power and leave the group they lead in a poorer condition after they are left. Toxic leadership is associated with incompetence, insularity, evil, intemperance (lack of self control), callousness, rigidity and corruption among other bad leadership characters. The leaders involved in toxic leadership are not concerned about uplifting the people they lead (followers). Instead, they make sure they satisfy their self interests. They fight and control instead of caring for their followers. In most cases, the leaders with this leadership style are leaders who bully, abuse, and discriminate the subordinates. In addition, they create a hostile climate, self serving and arrogant, threaten and even yell at their followers among other fierce characters. They do not lead based on their qualifications. However, they apply force to be in leadership positions thus making the lives of their followers a misery . They are selfish in that they work to promote themselves without regard to the welfare of their followers. In most cases, do this by not minding about the future of their group and its members. This paper explores the effects of toxic leadership in the United States.
Leadership is defined as the ability to accomplish a set goal(s) due to the act of inspiring and motivating a group of your peers. Former United States president Dwight D. Eisenhower made famous a quote that stated, “Leadership consists of nothing but taking responsibility for everything that goes wrong and giving your subordinates credit for everything that goes well.” (Notable-quotes.com). One of the most important aspects of the work area is leadership. Without leadership, there will be no guidance to for teamwork and the percentage of successful goal will be slim to none. Becoming a great leader is no easy feat however. An exceptional leader must lock in on specific attributes such as intellect, moral character, and human
Leadership is the ability or authority to guide and direct others towards achievement of goal without force that leaves them feeling empowered and accomplished. Besides, leader has a significant impact on ethical decision making. This is because leaders have the power to motivate others and enforce the organization norms and policies as well as their own viewpoint. Leadership involves establishing a clear vision, sharing that vision with others, providing the information, knowledge and methods to realize that vision, coordinating
Leadership is a process of influencing activities of a particular group of people with the aim of attaining certain stipulated goals. In defining leadership there is need to consider a particular group, the common goals and the duties that are allocated to specific members of the group depending on their abilities (Fiedler 1976). Leadership therefore cannot successfully occur unless members of the group are given different considerations in terms of personality, traits and responsibilities. In considering leadership, it is important to look at the leader, the group or organization they are leading, the members as individuals and the situation; these are
(For the posterity of said leader, I will refer to them as Rachael.) Rachael is a great physician and mother, but a weak leader. She is a leader who greatly lacks self confidence and has poor communication skills which causes her to physically tremble, become red faced, often times cry, and never make eye contact when speaking with more than two people. She also employs passive aggressive tactics which could be a result of her lack of self confidence. However, while I do not truly know the reasons for her lack of self confidence, poor communication skills, and passive aggressiveness, I do know those are ineffective leadership traits and I will not employ those as I gain positions of
The factors in narcissism are exhibit as a person who has the love for themselves, desire for power, exploitive, arrogance, and self - entitled (McBride, 2015; Nahavandi, 2014). The traits of a narcissistic leader appear as if there is a borderline of personality disorder considering the extreme individual desire for attention, power and control (McBride, 2015; Nahavandi, 2014). However, leaders who are narcissistic can be mentally stable enough and can exhibit the best characteristic in their leadership role provided that they have a good sense of balance (Chan, 2014). Such as being likable, shy, and quiet in drawing followers acceptance in a good leader who may have a lower self-assessment narcissism score (Chan, 2014; Nahavandi, 2014).
A narcissistic leader can be destructive to an organization, work team, or department in result of their arrogance, sense of entitlement, need for power, and self-absorption. They possess a charisma that draws people towards their vision. Then, gain a following in which they will pursue with all that they can to get their desired results. They love to keep groupies around because they love to have their egos stroked and they need constant validation to endorse their excessive need for admiration (Arabi, 2014). The narcissist often abuse their power and use flattery in order to maintain control of their victims.
Crisis management: the psychological implications of leading during a catastrophic event. How have leaders controlled stress-induced apprehension that impairs control and persuasive abilities to act during an extreme crisis? How have leaders successfully controlled stress-induced apprehension, therefore negatively affecting control and abilities to act during an extreme crisis? How do today’s leadership theories apply in a volatile environment? Effective leadership in high-pressure situation occurs through enhanced understanding of the psychological aspects that affect our cognitive abilities during crisis mode. In a leadership position, is it advantageous to transition in applications based on unstable settings, therefore implying
Leadership is defined in Webster’s Dictionary as the “action of leading a group of people or an organization.” Leadership is also the ability to set trends, inspire, motivate, and sway others to produce desired results. There are different styles and ways of performing leadership and a good leader has the ability to take ordinary people, put them all together, and hopefully yield successful results. For organizations to have sustained results from their performance there must be a good balance of business insight, technical and interpersonal skills, and good team dynamics. A leader must know how to use all these areas as well as trust and communicate with their people in
Research shows successful leaders achieve peak performance, even in uncertain times, because they are charismatic, conditioned to accomplish, and they get people to take action; yet there is a dark side that can profoundly affect those closest to them.