“One seldom recognizes the devil when he has his hand your shoulder.” These were the words said by Albert Speer, the Nazi who said sorry. So who was Albert Speer? Albert Speer (born March 19 1905) was an architect, author and high-ranking Nazi German government official. Speer studied in the technical college in Munich and Berlin before gaining his architectural license in 1927. Although he was an architect he originally wanted to become a mathematician when he was young but he ended up following the footsteps of his father and grandfather and decided to do architecture. Speer was one of three boys in his wealthy family upper class family. The Speer’s were protected by their wealth from the more severe effects of WW1 and economic chaos of hyperinflation. Alberts Speer’s family life was not a warm and happy experience because his parents had neither time nor love for him. His father was cold and distant while his mother was more concerned with the activities of her social whirl than the concerns of her middle son. He was bullied by his brothers and only seemed to receive affection from his French Jewish governess. Speer seemed strangely indifferent to politics in his youth. His father had been a liberal for many years. He keenly kept up with political developments but did not allow the discussion of politics in the home. In 1930 while working as an academic at the institute Technology Berlin Speer attended a Nazi Party rally. For the most time he heard Hitler speak about
Albert Parsons was not a dangerous man all he wanted was to work a reasonable amount of hours and get payed well. For instance, in Document A Parson states that all the work class wanted was to work less and get payed more. This clearly shows that parson was not a dangerous man all he wanted was to improve working conditions. Parson could also be depicted as not a dangerous man because he wanted to create a society where there is equality amongst the workforce. For example in the letter Parson wrote to his wife he writes that he will die trying to change the low pay labor because he does not want his children to have a life of wage- slavery and poverty (Document E). this shows how Parson just wanted to change the work wages for his kids would
Because of the same burning interest for architecture Speer became one of Hitler's best friends. The men were able to reach this closeness, as Spear didn't have a thirst for power or political intentions like many of the other party members. It was during the design and building of the barrack camps for the men of the autobahn, that Speer and Hitler developed an increasing intimacy as they spent lunches and dinners together in their tightly knit circle of important men. ' A close relationship had become established between us, and I counted on profiting, humanly and artistically, from it."
Hitler then joined NSDAP where he started to gain his power by becoming their strongman due too being able to inspire people with his speeches. In his speeches he claimed “Jews were not only responsible for the unfair German defeat but were also blocking Germany’s recovery.” This kind of shows what he thought of
Albert Bierstadt was one of the greatest landscape artists in history (Albert Bierstadt). His naturalistic landscape scenes of the unsettled American West brought about the need to preserve the land; in 1872, the United States Congress passed the Yellowstone Park Bill therefore creating the first national park in the world (Sierra Nevada). One of Albert Bierstadt more iconic paintings is titled the Sierra Nevada; it was painted in the year 1872. He uses different lines, shows incredible texture, impeccable depth, stunning colors and design in his painting the Sierra Nevada.
Albert Speer was born in 1905 into an upper-middle class family. His family’s wealth provided the opportunity to extend his education at a university level despite the depths of the depression in 1930. After graduating with a degree in architecture, Speer was introduced to the policies of the Nazi Party; however, it did not leave a great impression due to his liberal upbringing. It wasn’t until December 1930 that he attended a party rally and saw Hitler speak; he was instantly mesmerised by his presence and confidence during a time of political
The first positive was that Speer has been labelled the ‘Good Nazi’ for his iconic apology at the Nuremburg trials in 1945, in which he accepted collective guilt for the war crimes of the Nazi regime, whilst denying individual guilt. This was seen as an extremely positive move for Germany as it showed that not all Germans were as radical as the Nazi Regime itself.
Albert Speer’s significant contribution towards history can be assessed in two sections. His contribution on a national scale consisted of his role as Hitler’s architect to encourage the perception of the Nazi Party to the German people, his position of Armaments Minister and his reorganisation of the industry to maximise production and through his defiance to Hitler’s scorched earth policy. His dedication to the Nazi Party effected history on an international level. Through his involvement with anti-semitic activities and his admission of collective responsibility changed the way a “war criminal” is seen throughout history.
Albert Speer was born on the 19th of March 1905. His family was very well off compared to the general population and their social status demanded an adherence to social conventions and formality. As a student and early adult, Speer was very apolitical however leaned towards the communism. Speer was first introduced to Nazism in 1930 where he was first inspired by Hitler’s oratory skills. Speer became a member of the Nazi Party on March the 1st 1931 with the membership number 474,481. From this point Speer was provided with many opportunities within the party, specifically in architecture, Hitler was especially
The tone helps to display Albert Speer’s feelings towards the party all throughout the biography. Later after the war Speer stated, “He had accepted Hitler’s commands and must share the responsibility for their consequences” (304). Here Speer wants to show that although he was only following orders, he shows remorse and deserves punishment. The
The historiographical analysis will be created by using sources and material both from written documentation such as books, novels, journals, and statements as well as media outlets such as film and newspapers. The most prominent elements and features of the essay will explore, elaborate and examine the historiographical viewpoints from different historians that both support as well as betray the belief of Speer ever being a 'Good Nazi' in the terms of both his involvement with the usage of slave labour, as well as his involvement with the ‘Scorched Earth’ order. It shall delve into the various Historian ideas of how it is that Speer managed to create an aspiring character construction of himself as a ‘Good Nazi’ during his time during the trails of Nuremberg as well as considering controversial elements of alternate historical views on the topic that it may be the case that Speer was simply just an opportunistic architect who had been using the popularity of the Nazis for his own self-gain, whilst ultimately being misguided into the inner circles of National Socialist politics.[
3) The ascent of National Socialism. In 1923, Hitler held a meeting of all high-ranking Nazis in a beer hall in Munich, where he revealed his plans for a coup. This failed attempt to overthrow the Weimar government would later be known as the Munich Putsch, which “gave the Nazi’s unparalleled publicity”. The use of the radio in order to spread the National socialist message played a pivotal role in the Nazi parties’ popular rise in society. Due to the ramifications that Germany faced after the First World War, the nation had unquestionably lost faith in tradition and their priorities had shifted to populist nationalism. On the eve of Hitler’s appointment, victory parades took place in dozens of German settlements. The capital saw nearly a million Berliners demonstrate their commitment to the National Socialist party who had pledged to establish “a strong-willed and strong-armed racial state” in “a very new twentieth-century Germany”. History shows that Hitler’s tremendous and irrefutably passionate presence came about at the perfect time, filling the void created by populace sentiment. Much of the
Through the analysis of events and constructions relating to the works of Speer and Hitler, it can be clearly seen that, unlike Krier’s statements to the contrary, the works constructed during the Nazi period cannot be separated from their political surroundings and must be observed and examined within their political context. By recounting events within the Nazi regime relating to the constructions and building works of the regime it becomes clear that the works are not only intrinsically linked to the political context, but are a means in order to expand and concentrate political ideology.
Following the war he lived in war-torn Germany and attended many political gatherings. The turning point of Hitler's mesmerizing oratorical career occurred at a Nazi party meeting held on October 16, 1919. Hitler's emotional delivery of an impromptu speech captivated his audience. Through word of mouth, donations poured into the party's coffers, and subsequent mass meetings attracted hundreds of Germans eager to hear the young, forceful and hypnotic leader. With the assistance of party staff, Hitler drafted a party program consisting of twenty-five points. This platform was presented at a public meeting on February 24, 1920, with over 2,000 eager participants. After hecklers were forcibly removed by Hitler supporters armed with rubber truncheons and whips, Hitler electrified the audience with his masterful demagoguery.
Oskar Schindler was a very complex and dynamic man. When the Nazi party rose to power and began to dominate and discriminate against
Hitler was a very passionate speaker that was incredibly adept to connecting to his audience in order to influence or persuade. The people he was speaking to would feel his passion. His charisma for speaking combined with the weak structure of Germany at the time made him influential beyond any other. He had the combined skills of an actor and a politician, “he could talk well and he had the actor’s gift of mimicry to amuse his companions. (Green, 2001, pg. 12), and everything he said and did had a calculated