Instead of chocolate helping you boast up dopamine, and a sweet aftertaste in your mouth. Medicines can do the same! Medicines have become a revolutionary adult candy. Where we turn our heads to whenever we are having a bad headache or even a serious chronic issue. In other words, forget the chocolate when you can have medications which is beneficial for your body, right? Likewise, we’ve heard it on the news, “Taking Tylenol can help with headaches. But, yet don’t take to much due to possible liver damage.” Furthermore, consumers buy drugs off the selves and even get from doctors to prescribe them. Do we believe that these small capsules actually give the benefit it tells us? Even so, would it be alright to take pills often and if so can it …show more content…
Bayer, the pharmaceutical company that developed Cerivastatin, is an innovation company that develops new molecules for use in innovative products and solutions to improve the health of humans, animals and plants. The main focus of their research and development activities are based on understanding the biochemical process in living organisms. Cerivastatin was introduced in 1997 because Bayers thought sales potential was limited and based on ahead when market conditions improved it looked promising for many years until it was pulled off from the market in 2001 due to the thirty deaths that were linked with the drug. Bayers has been dealing with the aftermath ever since. The drug was pulled from the market due to it’s reports to the FDA of development of rhabdomyolysis—a rare disorder in which muscles tissue is broken down and can lead to organ failure and death—in patients who took the drug! There have been accusations during Bayer’s lawsuit from the many families of those who died after taking Baycol how staffs of Bayer’s struggled to response to the increasing number of reports of patients who became ill with rhabdo while taking Baycol. In March 2000, Bayer did take an internal analysis of the reports of rhabdo cases and have their epidemiologist, Steve Niemcryk reviewed reports of rhabdo that regulators …show more content…
Vioxx was developed by Merck and was approved May 1999. It was on the market for about five years until recall was on September 30, 2004 where the company itself attempted to cover up risks may have resulted in the unnecessary deaths of thousands of patients around the world. The risks were heart attacks and strokes were increased due to the use of Vioxx and nearly thirty thousand excess cases of heart attacks and sudden cardiac related deaths was resulted from the use of the drug between 1999-2003. Merck attempted to cover up it’s action and FDA even added by approving sales of the drug without further investigation of the potential harm consequences of the medication use. The reason for it’s development was not to aid those who had dysmenorrhea but it was Merck way of of boosting it’s revenues by developing a huge drug. Because of the high adverse events, doctors felt the company to place the drug in a study to compare to other drugs to demonstrate it’s gastrionintestional improvements. So the company placed the drug in a 1999 study known as VIGRO (Vioxx Gastrointestinal Outcome Research) and manipulate the results. The study only gave out results of the supposed heart benefits of naproxen rather then statistically show the
Hello Professor. I agree that medications are the magic solution to treat diseases if they are used appropriately. For example, when antipsychotic medications are not used correctly could lead to functional decline and cognitive impairment. The health care professionals’ knowledge of safe medication use, risks and benefits, and the drug-related problem are important when taking care of elderly patients. “In 2015, the AGS Beers Criteria were again updated by an expert panel of healthcare and pharmacy experts to help prevent potential medication side effects and other medication-related problems in older adults” (Health in Aging, 2015). It is pivotal to use the guidelines of Beers Criteria in our daily practice to prevent inappropriate use of
The pharmaceutical industry is one of the most powerful and greedy industries in our country, with a goal to make as large a profit as possible, at the expense of the sick.
With access to prescription drugs, people are able to treat a multitude of diseases and illnesses. These drugs help deal with pain, inability to sleep, depression, and much more. Every day we are increasingly living in a world where there is better living through chemicals. However, what most do not seem to see is the rising tide of pain, illness, and ultimately death being caused by the pills people take every day. Most keep drugs in a special place in their minds, where they see them as harmless. Sadly, this is not the case, and in some cases our prescription drugs can be just as harmful as illegal drugs (King 68).
The intended use of medications is meant to improve a person’ health, it is very important the individual administering medication or self-medicating use the drugs correctly, by following the doctors’ instruction for the medication prescribed. Medication is given to diagnose, treat, and prevent illness. Medication can be very dangerous, which can potentially cause harm or even deaf if it’s not used properly.
Dr. David Graham is the senior scientist within the FDA’s Office of Drug Safety. Graham became concerned when he started to see an increased number of patients having heart attacks and strokes after taking a large does of the drug Vioxx, back in 2002. He raised his concern to the FDA saying that the warning label needs to be changed due to his new findings. He had trouble getting this any attention from the FDA’s administration and decided it was time to ‘blow the whistle’ and go to the media.
Not all prescription drugs have the potential for abuse and addiction. Many drugs don’t even act in the brain. For example, antibiotics are not addictive. On the rare occasion people who take drugs for medical conditions may become addicted. This is why it is extremely important to be under a doctor’s care while taking prescription medication.4 Most prescription drugs are taken in a form that gets to the brain slowly at a dose that treats a problem, but doesn’t overwhelm the system. Both of which reduce the likelihood of an addiction. Long-term medical use of prescription drugs can
In today's society people are quick to find easy and fast ways to make them feel better or reduce stress leading to long term health problems. Medication is designed to ease someone or somethings pain, but overusing a drug can result in side effects that can force someone to need more drugs to get better. Siri Carpenter believes that the use of multiple and unnecessary medication is escalating and frightening. “The use of multiple, often unnecessary medications — especially among older people — is an entrenched, escalating, frightening, and mostly unexamined problem in modern healthcare care,” (Carpenter 1). People find it easy to take
Word spread very quickly about the drug that cured the President’s son and quickly became adopted by maternity hospitals to treat childbed fever and various consumers to treat strep infections. Since this life saving drug was cheap and has few side effects, the popularity and demand for Prontosil skyrocketed to the point that U.S. production companies were not even able to meet the demands of the consumers at one point. Physicians kept on prescribing the drug for a variety of diseases, including illnesses that were not proven to be affected by Prontosil. All the while, Bayer was reaping the successes of the drug on the market and was prepared to take
People all over the world, continue to be tendered prescription medication, which in many cases further complicate health issues with its myriad of side effects. In fact, statistics have shown that approximately 100,000 people around the world die as a result of prescription drugs annually (Smith, 2012). On the contrary, according
In the article, Does the FDA Adequately Protect the Public? by Marc Ferris, he argues that the drug could pose a serious health threat. Most people take medications when they get sick, but taking medications could make their health worse. Ferris said that “but in recent years, the reputation of the nation's drug-safety system has been especially tarnished after several prescription drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were later found to have dangerous side effects for some users, triggering voluntary manufacturer recalls” (par. 3). He claims that the FDA approved prescription drugs, and there were several cases that they recalled the drugs due to dangerous side effects which could lead to deaths. Therefore, he wonders
Last year, in September 2004, Merck withdrawed Vioxx, off the market. Studies of Vioxx showed that it doubled the risk of a heart attack or stroke for patients who have used it more than 18 months. After Merck, withdrawed Vioxx from the market, the FDA, issued a public health advisory for the users of Vioxx. Therefore, Vioxx was on the market for five years without
How well does the average know about the prescription medications they ingest every day? Does one actually need them for something as common as feeling a little anxious sometimes, headache issues that cause annoyance to your daily lives, or even helping someone sleep a little better at night? While some serious circumstances need medical prescribed medicine (whereas the symptoms are quite worth the help), most people are unaware of natural routes.
Merck is a drug manufacture giant who brings an annual revenue of nearly fifty billion. Prior the Vioxx recall Merck was a highly valued company when it came to its ethical standard. It had consistently toped list for companies to work for (Lawrence & Weber, 2014). In addition to this they were well recognized as a socially responsible company who placed an importance on testing to provide the best quality pharmaceuticals. The Vioxx recall caused a huge blow for the company resulting in lawsuits and drop in company value.
The 1990s and the Prescription Drug User Fee Act brought an era of shorter drug review times, larger FDA agency budgets, and more staffers. By 1999, the median drug review time was less than twelve months and six months for priority drugs. However, patient advocates and those who were more concerned with Type II errors and the passage of unsafe pharmaceuticals were apprehensive about this new trend of loose regulation and repeatedly pointed out the increase in drug recalls. The financial relationship established between the industry and the agency by the PDFUA cast doubt on the impartiality of the review process leading to drug recall scandals such as the Vioxx scandal of 2004, where a drug used to treat arthritis remained on the market long
Even though somehow initially the FDA approved it to be safe, the drug made the cows sick and it gave them an infection in the utters, called Mastitis. Having Mastitis can put puss in the milk produced by the sick cow which makes the milk have a lot more bacteria. Then the cows were given antibiotics to prevent them from getting sick, but then the antibiotics ingested by the cows were then released through the milk. When people ingest the milk with all of the antibiotics still in it, the people can become immune to antibiotics for the future. If a person drinks this milk with all of the antibiotics in it and them somehow get a Staph Infection and need a simple antibiotic to get rid of it, they could die because they were immune to antibiotics.