An "$" Ranked School Schools, especially those with low rankings, constantly attempt to appear better. Schools with low rankings are plagued by a plethora of problems, the most prominent being low pass rates. When faced with this situation, schools turn to programs such as "cash for grades" which pays students and teachers for A's and B's. However appealing this may seem, the abhorrent activity of remunerating students must not continue because it causes no increase in aptitude, generates a loss of intrinsic motivation, and reduces the likelihood that students will challenge themselves with honors or Advanced Placement classes. While cash for grades may seem like a good idea on the surface, it actually does not cause the students to gain any skills. In other words, those being paid do not magically learn how to study, take good notes, or …show more content…
These classes look incredible on transcripts, but students are reasoning that an easier class means an easier twenty dollars. Those in favor may posit that there are "big increases in Advanced Placement tests given" (Matthews). However, the percentage of those that pass these tests is falling, which serves to prove that these programs are not helping. Schools have an obligation to get students ready for life, and by instituting cash for grades programs, schools allow students to set themselves up for failure. Cash for grades programs do not work, yet schools still need a way to improve their rankings. Using the money provided by cash for grades for more beneficial programs. Perhaps paying students for reading books, a concept that was met with great success in Dallas (Flannery). Students could also be paid for attending tutoring. As long as the negative consequences resulting from cash for grades do not become apparent, these ideas could be the solution that schools everywhere are looking
If students are rewarded for quality schoolwork, grades may initially improve. They may show more excitement. However, in the article “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades” by Amy Mccready, it is found that the enhanced grades deteriorate along with the excitement for the payment. Most children simply lose interest in the reward. It is better to just let youth accomplish
In “Why Colleges Shower Their Students with A’s”, Staples argues that teacher inflate grades so that their course will not be canceled. Furthermore, teachers will inflate grades so that they can keep their jobs. Additionally, students are trying to find ways to get
Furthermore, the author points out that grades are not improving because students and education are improving but rather because parents and students are demanding grades to be adjusted according to what they think it is needed not what it is deserved. “Students and parents are demanding -- and getting -- what they think of as their money's worth” (Staples, 216). Students are not receiving the grade they truly deserve based on their work but what the parents and the students themselves
Every six out of ten kids in school have failing grades. Almost every kid gets stress due to their grades. Paying kids for their grades will give them motivation, and desire to work harder. Kids should get paid for their grades to get inspired into doing better.
This sort of situation can be defined as ‘Grade Deflation’ which means that higher grades are harder or more difficult to receive because a very small amount can be given out or to protect an institution. Grade deflation should be reduced or even eliminated because it can improve education and positively affect a student’s future. Elizabeth Wissner-Gross tells us about grade deflation and why and how it should be terminated in her article “Invitation to a Dialogue: Stop deflating Grades” published on the New York Times. The Author argues against high schools and colleges that are manipulating numbers in order to protect their institutions from being accused of grade inflation. Some administrators believe that too many A’s can, in some ways, affect their institution’s image negatively. The author, while
If they give these students money, they’ll never have any motivation to go to class. Many of them don’t want to go already, combined with the fact that some may be receiving grades without doing any work. Money will only add to this fact.
Economists have recently started looking into rewarding students for outstanding grades. Schools could start providing scholarships,
Getting paid for good grades has changed many people's lives and also changed their grades and knowledge. Wouldn't you want money for grades change your life too? Kids should get paid for grades to help the people who can't afford a simple,nice meal. Also, to keep their grades up and act like school is their job, because basically, it is. To begin with, many families need the money to survive and thrive.
School is slave labor. Rather than enjoying or learning from their classes, students are forced to do useless work that will often be forgotten immediately. Grades are meant to show much a student understands a class, but instead are used as a scale of how well a student can regurgitate answers onto a test. Students only work for good grades because of the threat of being punished for failure, and the promise of reward for passing. The punishments in this case are detention or trouble from teachers, and the rewards are making the honor roll or getting bragging rights. The real reward for learning should be having new knowledge, but this is not taken into consideration. Jerry Farber, a professor at U.S.D, made the strong claim that grades are useless and harmful in his essay, “A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System.” I wholeheartedly agree with Farber’s objection to our current grading system.
Grade inflation, the belief that students are receiving grades that they haven’t worked for and therefore don’t deserve. But what’s so wrong about grade inflation? When learning about this subject we also open the doors to learning about the multitude of other problems plaguing our educational system that could use our attention much more than grade inflation does. Through grade inflation we’re able to understand problems often forgotten about and looked over.
There are major flaws in the argument for attempting to pay students for obtaining exceptional grades. One of the flaws is the fact that the money used for the payment of the pupils is coming from their parents. With this policy, the parents will be required to pay additional taxes to account for the need for money within the school district. Many individuals who are for this practice argue that the money is going straight back to the families. Although this is true, the money is going to the children not the parents. Many students are not going to provide the money to their parent, but instead use it for their own wants or needs.
Although she has many good points, I disagree. Students should not get paid to have good grades and to stay in school. I do believe that students should get good grades and stay in school, but should not receive payment for something most students are already forced to do. Let's face it, what student, on the brink of dropping out, is going to stay in school just to earn ten measly dollars. Some say only students who acquire good grades should receive payment. So with that taken into account, there are many questions that need to be asked, such as what grade point average is considered to be good, how much will students be getting paid for this certain grade point average, how will students get paid, cash, check, debit card, lunch money, and the list just continues on. A study conducted by Harvard Crimson showed that although when students were provided financial incentives to score well on tests, the students being paid actually did not do any better than the students
Would students be able to improve their grades if they were getting paid? Money is a great reward for most students and it could possibly have a long term effect on students. They are always wanting their grades to be improved and then they would have more of a reason to study for test and quizzes if they were getting paid do go to school. Students would be focused at school if their was money to be made by going to school. Teachers would also not be stopping as often because of students getting of track. I believe students would improve their grades if they were getting paid because, Money could have a long term effect, and more student could need a little more motivation
In the article, “Why You Shouldn’t Pay Children for Grades,” Amy McCready details her argument against children receiving money as a reward for good grades. Her main point is expressed in her article as a sentence: “But no matter how much we want it to, money can’t buy smarts, motivation, or school success.” She is expressing her idea that paying kids will not genuinely help them. Within the article, McCready expresses her dislike of parents using payment to attempt to encourage student achievement. Her points include her belief that paying children won’t maintain high grades because kids lose interest and excitement over time. She also believes that payment for grades creates a negative attitude within the children and invoke a sense of entitlement.
“Mom, if you want me to go to school, give me five dollars.” This is an example of what might happen if you pay your kids for great grades. If schools truly wanted kids to succeed, they would teach them better, do new lessons, and not pay students for anything they’re supposed to be doing all ready. Paying children for favorable grades robs their feeling of accomplishment. In addition, they don’t take in what they’ve been taught in class. Also, money doesn’t really help the kids in the long run, if you’re not teaching them about it. Paying students for superb grades is a poor idea, as a result they only do their work for the money, and they want the money so badly, they lose the love.